Michele Simionato wrote:
> Ron Adam:
>
>>Thats part of what I'm trying to resolve, the doc strings a lot of
>
> time
>
>>isn't enough by itself or is missing. So I'm trying to build up a
>>complete enough record so if there is no doc string, at least some
>
> sense
>
>>of what it is can be fig
These days I use generators instead of StringIO, i.e.
instead of
print >> out, mystring
I just write
yield mystring
and then I "".join the generator.
Michele Simionato
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ron Adam:
> Thats part of what I'm trying to resolve, the doc strings a lot of
time
> isn't enough by itself or is missing. So I'm trying to build up a
> complete enough record so if there is no doc string, at least some
sense
> of what it is can be figured out without a lot browsing or looking at
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>> ...What would be the advantage of using StringIO over list.append with
>> ''.join()?
>
> The advantage is more in using a function that prints as it goes
> rather than building up a large string to print. I would call the
> print function at the
Ron Adam wrote:
> ...What would be the advantage of using StringIO over list.append with
> ''.join()?
The advantage is more in using a function that prints as it goes
rather than building up a large string to print. I would call the
print function at the bottom (with None as the print destinatio
Michele Simionato wrote:
> Ron Adam:
>
>
>>Sound great! Adding a command line parser, I'm going to add a brief
^---^
That part should have been deleted, I meant your whole program sounded
good, not just that part. :-)
>>command line parser to it today
Ron Adam:
> Sound great! Adding a command line parser, I'm going to add a brief
> command line parser to it today, but nothing as elaborate as you have
> already. Could you post a part of the output as an example? How is
the
> index built?
For the command line parser, see
http://aspn.activesta
Michele Simionato wrote:
>>Do you have any feature suggestions, additional information that
>
> could
>
>>go in, something that would extend the content in some way and make
>
> it
>
>>more useful?
>
>
> I have written something similar which I use all the time. It generates
> ReST
> output w
> Do you have any feature suggestions, additional information that
could
> go in, something that would extend the content in some way and make
it
> more useful?
I have written something similar which I use all the time. It generates
ReST
output which I can browse with "less" from the command line,
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>>Do you have any feature suggestions, additional information that could
>>go in, something that would extend the content in some way and make it
>>more useful?
>>
>>As it stands now, it could be just a module, so you could...
>>
>
> The style is s
Ron Adam wrote:
> Do you have any feature suggestions, additional information that could
> go in, something that would extend the content in some way and make it
> more useful?
>
> As it stands now, it could be just a module, so you could...
>
The style is still a sticking point for me -- too m
Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Althought object is a horrible name for your own value (there is a builtin
> object which you use for defining new-style classes), you probably want:
Good point, I agree. It's a bad habit to start, sooner or later it
would cause a problem. I'll find something else
Ron Adam wrote:
> John Machin wrote:
>
>> Ron Adam wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone have suggestions on how to improve this further?
>>
>> Not functionally (from me, yet). However if you can bear a stylistic
>> comment, do read on :-)
>>
>>> elif (isinstance(object,str)
>>> or isi
John Machin wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
>>Does anyone have suggestions on how to improve this further?
>
>
> Not functionally (from me, yet). However if you can bear a stylistic
> comment, do read on :-)
>
>
>> elif (isinstance(object,str)
>> or isinstance(object,int)
>>
Ron Adam wrote:
> Does anyone have suggestions on how to improve this further?
Not functionally (from me, yet). However if you can bear a stylistic
comment, do read on :-)
> elif (isinstance(object,str)
> or isinstance(object,int)
> or isinstance(object,
I think this deserves a little more of a description than I gave it
initially.
The routine in the previous message does a little more than just print
out __doc__ strings. It outputs a formatted alphabetical list of objects
in a module with each objects, name, class or type, and then tries to
16 matches
Mail list logo
