On 2007-03-13, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 15:45:30 -, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
>
>>
>> IMO, robustness is also a quality of a language. In language
>> like C and C++, it's difficult to write a prog
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm a Python developer, I don't give a rats ass about what
> > people say about C#, Python, or c++, they all have their uses.
> > My main reasoning for considering C++ as the backend is some
> > things (reading memory fo
On 13 Mar, 04:33, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-03-13, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > and we already have a lot written in C++.
[...]
> I think you're nuts to decide that you need C++ before you've
> tested a Python implementation, but it's your nickle. :)
I'm
David Cramer a écrit :
> On Mar 12, 9:56 am, Bruno Desthuilliers [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Diez B. Roggisch a écrit :
>>
>>> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Grant Edwards a écrit :
(snip)
> Python is _far_ more robust than C++.
I wouldn't say so - robustness is a quality of a prog
I have coded some complex programs in python in the recent past.
I find it very robust and also not very slow (as is depicted by the
starter of this thread ) I use wxpython on the gui side and testify
that it is indeed very suitable for huge gui apps.
may be pyqt is good enough too and I believe s
On 2007-03-13, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Everyone seems to have misunderstood what I want.
One might suspect that your request was unclear. ;)
> I'm a Python developer, I don't give a rats ass about what
> people say about C#, Python, or c++, they all have their uses.
> My main r
On Mar 12, 9:56 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Diez B. Roggisch a écrit :
>
> > Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
> >> Grant Edwards a écrit :
> >> (snip)
>
> >>> Python is _far_ more robust than C++.
>
> >> I wouldn't say so - robustness is a quality of a program, not of a
> >> language !-)
>
> > No
Diez B. Roggisch a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
>> Grant Edwards a écrit :
>> (snip)
>>
>>> Python is _far_ more robust than C++.
>>>
>> I wouldn't say so - robustness is a quality of a program, not of a
>> language !-)
>
> Nope. Dealing with dangling references and double frees, comple
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
> Grant Edwards a écrit :
> (snip)
>
>>
>> Python is _far_ more robust than C++.
>>
>
> I wouldn't say so - robustness is a quality of a program, not of a
> language !-)
Nope. Dealing with dangling references and double frees, complex
copy-semantics that change only
On 2007-03-12, Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Edwards a écrit :
> (snip)
>
>> Python is _far_ more robust than C++.
>
> I wouldn't say so - robustness is a quality of a program, not of a
> language !-)
IMO, robustness is also a quality of a language. In language
like C an
Grant Edwards a écrit :
(snip)
>
> Python is _far_ more robust than C++.
>
I wouldn't say so - robustness is a quality of a program, not of a
language !-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2007-03-11, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 10:52 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> David Cramer wrote:
>> > If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
>> > which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
>>
David Cramer a écrit :
> On Mar 10, 10:52 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>David Cramer wrote:
>>
>>>If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
>>>which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
>>>would you suggest using c++ and
David Cramer a écrit :
> If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
> which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
> would you suggest using c++ and Python?
>
> I'm asking because we were originally thinking about doing c# but
> after attending PyCon
"David Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 10:52 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> David Cramer wrote:
>> > If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
>> > which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
>> > would you
David Cramer schrieb:
> On Mar 10, 10:52 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> David Cramer wrote:
>>> If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
>>> which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
>>> would you suggest using c++ and Py
On Mar 11, 12:26 pm, "David Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mar 10, 10:52 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > David Cramer wrote:
> > > If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
> > > which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and
"David Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
> which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
> would you suggest using c++ and Python?
>
> I'm asking because we were originally thinking about doing c# but
>
On Mar 10, 10:52 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> David Cramer wrote:
> > If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
> > which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
> > would you suggest using c++ and Python?
>
> I'd strongly cons
David Cramer wrote:
> If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
> which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
> would you suggest using c++ and Python?
I'd strongly consider a pure python solution (I'd choose wxpython),
but if I needed to code back
On Mar 10, 9:23 pm, "David Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you had an application that you were about to begin development on
> which you wanted to be cross platform (at least Mac and Windows),
> would you suggest using c++ and Python?
Depending on what exactly you're trying to do, a pure
21 matches
Mail list logo
