On May 30, 9:42 am, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 30, 9:16 am, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 29 May 2008 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT), Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
>
> > > I observed, that every thread reserved some me
On May 30, 9:16 am, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2008 12:01:30 -0700 (PDT), Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
>
> > I observed, that every thread reserved some memory, and after exit
> > thread doesn't freed it. When i leaved my
On Wed, 28 May 2008 11:38:53 -0700, RossGK wrote:
>
> I've answered my own question about the "None" state - an event was
> setting the thread to None where I didn't expect it.
>
> However, my question slightly repositioned is if a Thread is "Stopped"
> it still seems to exist. Is there someway
I've answered my own question about the "None" state - an event was
setting the thread to None where I didn't expect it.
However, my question slightly repositioned is if a Thread is "Stopped"
it still seems to exist. Is there someway to make it go away, send it
to garbage collection etc?
Other p
On May 28, 12:01 pm, RossGK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm a newbie to python threads, and playing with some simple client
> server stuff and lots of print statements.
>
> My server thread launched with
> self.worker = WorkerThread(self)
> completes an interaction and then if I check on it's
> Can you please suggest a technique in Python where we can spawn few number
> of worker threads and later map them to a function/s to execute individual
> Jobs.
Have a look at the threading module:
http://docs.python.org/lib/module-threading.html
HTH,
Daniel
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
S.Mohideen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can you please suggest a technique in Python where we can spawn few number
> of worker threads and later map them to a function/s to execute individual
> Jobs.
>
> Any references would be helpful..
I believe I give some examples in the Nutshel
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
S.Mohideen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Can you please suggest a technique in Python where we can spawn few number
>of worker threads and later map them to a function/s to execute individual
>Jobs.
You can see an example for a web spider on my Python website.
--
I think that I found a solution to my thread issues, however I know it is
not the most efficient method possible.
Just to give you a little information on what this project is all about
I have 3 lists of email addresses.
(1) "host email address" = contains a list of all of my emails
a
Great, thanks for the tip Gabriel!
On 2/18/07, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
En Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:37:02 -0300, Sick Monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Well if this cannot be done, can a thread call a function in the main
> method?
> I have been trying and have not been suc
En Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:37:02 -0300, Sick Monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Well if this cannot be done, can a thread call a function in the main
> method?
> I have been trying and have not been successive. Perhaps I am using
> thread
> incorrectly.
The safe way to pass information betwe
Well if this cannot be done, can a thread call a function in the main
method?
I have been trying and have not been successive. Perhaps I am using thread
incorrectly.
On 2/18/07, Sick Monkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there anyway to get 2 python threads to talk to one another?
I have a GUI
Dejan Rodiger wrote:
> Jeremy said the following on 16.1.2007 8:27:
>
>> I have a fat C++ extension to a Python 2.3.4 program. In all, I count
>> five threads. Of these, two are started in Python using
>> thread.start_new_thread(), and both of these wait on semaphores in the C++
>> extension using
Jeremy said the following on 16.1.2007 8:27:
> Hello,
>
> I have a fat C++ extension to a Python 2.3.4 program. In all, I count
> five threads. Of these, two are started in Python using
> thread.start_new_thread(), and both of these wait on semaphores in the C++
> extension using sem_wait(). There
robert wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
>> "robert" wrote:
>>
>>> Simple Python code obviously cannot use the dual core by Python threads.
>>> Yet, a program drawing CPU mainly for matrix computations - preferably
>>> with Numeric/SciPy - will this profit from a dual core when using 2 (or
>>> more
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> "robert" wrote:
>
>
>>Simple Python code obviously cannot use the dual core by Python threads.
>>Yet, a program drawing CPU mainly for matrix computations - preferably
>>with Numeric/SciPy - will this profit from a dual core when using 2 (or
>>more) Python threads?
>
>
Oeyvind Brandtsegg wrote:
> I've been trying to make my music app use dual core,
> and would very much like some more detailed information on this.
>
> Excuse my lack of knowledge,
> but how do I explicitly release the GIL ?
http://docs.python.org/api/threads.html
> I haven't learned this, but h
I've been trying to make my music app use dual core,
and would very much like some more detailed information on this.
Excuse my lack of knowledge,
but how do I explicitly release the GIL ?
I haven't learned this, but have found through experimentation that I
can release a thread by using time.sle
"robert" wrote:
> Simple Python code obviously cannot use the dual core by Python threads.
> Yet, a program drawing CPU mainly for matrix computations - preferably
> with Numeric/SciPy - will this profit from a dual core when using 2 (or
> more) Python threads?
as long as the binding releases th
19 matches
Mail list logo
