Well then, wouldn't it make sense for PyPy to use Shedskin and its
definition of Restricted Python?
I have heard repeatedly that PyPy RPython is very difficult to use.
Then why isn't PyPy using Shedskin to compile its PyPy-Jit?
Sarvi
On Sep 2, 11:59 pm, John Nagle wrote:
> On 9/2/2010 10:30 PM,
On 9/2/2010 10:30 PM, sarvi wrote:
On Sep 2, 2:19 pm, John Nagle wrote:
On 9/2/2010 1:29 AM, sarvi wrote:
When I think about it these restrictions below seem a very reasonable
tradeoff for performance.
Yes.
And I can use this for just the modules/sections that are performance
critica
sarvi, 03.09.2010 07:30:
It should technically be possible to allow Python to call a module
written in RPython?
What's "Python" here? CPython? Then likely yes. I don't see a benefit, though.
It should also compile RPython to a python module.so right?
Why (and how) would CPython do that?
I
On Sep 2, 2:19 pm, John Nagle wrote:
> On 9/2/2010 1:29 AM, sarvi wrote:
>
> > When I think about it these restrictions below seem a very reasonable
> > tradeoff for performance.
>
> Yes.
>
> > And I can use this for just the modules/sections that are performance
> > critical.
>
> Not quit
On 9/2/2010 1:29 AM, sarvi wrote:
When I think about it these restrictions below seem a very reasonable
tradeoff for performance.
Yes.
And I can use this for just the modules/sections that are performance
critical.
Not quite. Neither Shed Skin nor RPython let you call from
restricted
When I think about it these restrictions below seem a very reasonable
tradeoff for performance.
And I can use this for just the modules/sections that are performance
critical.
Essentially, the PyPy interpreter can have a restricted mode that
enforces these restriction.
This will help write such RP
On 9/1/2010 10:49 AM, sarvi wrote:
Is there a plan to adopt PyPy and RPython under the python foundation
in attempt to standardize both.
I have been watching PyPy and RPython evolve over the years.
PyPy seems to have momentum and is rapidly gaining followers and
performance.
PyPy JIT and perf
sarvi, 02.09.2010 07:06:
Look at all the alternatives we have. Cython? Shedskin?
I'll take PyPy anyday instead of them
Fell free to do so, but don't forget that the choice of a language always
depends on the specific requirements at hand. Cython has proven its
applicability in a couple of lar
On Sep 1, 6:49 pm, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> sarvi gmail.com> writes:
> > Secondly I have always fantasized of never having to write C code yet
> > get its compiled performance.
> > With RPython(a strict subset of Python), I can actually compile it to
> > C/Machine code
>
> RPython is not suppo
On Sep 2, 3:49 am, sarvi wrote:
> Yet I see this forum relatively quite on PyPy or Rpython ? Any
> reasons???
For me, it's two major ones:
1. PyPy only recently hit a stability/performance point that makes it
worth checking out,
2. Using non-pure-python modules wasn't straightforward (at least
sarvi gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Is there a plan to adopt PyPy and RPython under the python foundation
> in attempt to standardize both.
There is not.
>
> Secondly I have always fantasized of never having to write C code yet
> get its compiled performance.
> With RPython(a strict subset of Pyt
11 matches
Mail list logo
