On Sep 2, 2:19 pm, John Nagle <na...@animats.com> wrote: > On 9/2/2010 1:29 AM, sarvi wrote: > > > When I think about it these restrictions below seem a very reasonable > > tradeoff for performance. > > Yes. > > > And I can use this for just the modules/sections that are performance > > critical. > > Not quite. Neither Shed Skin nor RPython let you call from > restricted code to unrestricted code. That tends to happen > implicitly as objects are passed around. It's the global > analysis that makes this work; when you call something, you > need to know more about it than how to call it.
It should technically be possible to allow Python to call a module written in RPython? It should also compile RPython to a python module.so right? Sarvi > > John Nagle -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
