Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
>> In England the corresponding expression is "Counting Angels on a
>> Pinhead"
>> http://dannyayers.com/2001/misc/angels.htm
>>
>
> Thanks, that is neat. I find the discussion on the sex of the angels,
> well, sexier. But we are probably a few hundred years late to
On 20 Jan 2007 14:19:12 -0800, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
> > On 20 Jan 2007 11:34:46 -0800, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> > >
> > > And that's why the existence of CINT is such a stark reminder of the
> > > separation between the language
Carl Friedrich Bolz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Looking over the benchmarks, one gains the impression that Python is a
> >>> slow language.
> >> What does that even mean - a slow language?
> >>
> >
> > The alioth benchmarks provide a set of numbers by which
> > languages may be
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2007 11:34:46 -0800, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
> > > On 1/20/07, Carl Friedrich Bolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > >>> Looking over the benchmarks, one gains the impression th
On 20 Jan 2007 11:34:46 -0800, Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
> > On 1/20/07, Carl Friedrich Bolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >>> Looking over the benchmarks, one gains the impression that Python is
> > > a
> > > >>> slow l
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
> On 1/20/07, Carl Friedrich Bolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>> Looking over the benchmarks, one gains the impression that Python is a
> > >>> slow language.
> > >> What does that even mean - a slow language?
> > >>
> > >
> > > The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Alioth is a great site for selecting the language in which to implement
> > > primitives. Usually it's C.
> >
> > And for selecting a language for which you might need to implement
> > primitives in C :-)
>
> Well if y
On 1/20/07, Carl Friedrich Bolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> Looking over the benchmarks, one gains the impression that Python is a
> >>> slow language.
> >> What does that even mean - a slow language?
> >>
> >
> > The alioth benchmarks provide a set of numbers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Looking over the benchmarks, one gains the impression that Python is a
>>> slow language.
>> What does that even mean - a slow language?
>>
>
> The alioth benchmarks provide a set of numbers by which
> languages may be compared.
Wrong. The benchmarks provide a s
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> In reality the choice would be C++ because of OO and STL.
I have seen that when Python+Psyco are too much slow, D language is a
good sweet half point between Python and C++ :-) Fast as C++ and with a
simpler syntax and semantics (Pyrex isn't bad, but D gives high-level
things
Isaac Gouy wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Alioth is a great site for selecting the language in which to implement
> > primitives. Usually it's C.
>
> And for selecting a language for which you might need to implement
> primitives in C :-)
Well if you like C so much, just do it in C. ":-)"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alioth is a great site for selecting the language in which to implement
> primitives. Usually it's C.
And for selecting a language for which you might need to implement
primitives in C :-)
>
> Two of the alioth benchmarks, Partial-sums and Spectral-norm, could be
> don
Alioth is a great site for selecting the language in which to implement
primitives. Usually it's C.
Two of the alioth benchmarks, Partial-sums and Spectral-norm, could be
done using Numarray, or would be done with Numarray if most of the
program was in Python and there was a need to implement a si
13 matches
Mail list logo
