"GöktuğKayaalp" wrote in message
news:mailman.6377.1391490975.18130.python-l...@python.org...
"BartC" writes:
"Göktuğ Kayaalp" wrote in message
news:mailman.4966.1388953508.18130.python-l...@python.org...
AFAIK, we do not have "postfix conditionals" in Python, i.e. a condition
appended to
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote:
> With my proposal implemented, the language would
> would be encouraging having multiple statements in one line, that looks
> like a single statement, but is indeed a composition of two.
I wouldn't have a problem with
if not i: break
in Pyt
[comments inline]
"BartC" writes:
> "Göktuğ Kayaalp" wrote in message
> news:mailman.4966.1388953508.18130.python-l...@python.org...
>
>> AFAIK, we do not have "postfix conditionals" in Python, i.e. a condition
>> appended to a
>> statement, which determines whether the statement runs or not:
>
"Göktuğ Kayaalp" wrote in message
news:mailman.4966.1388953508.18130.python-l...@python.org...
AFAIK, we do not have "postfix conditionals" in Python, i.e. a condition
appended to a
statement, which determines whether the statement runs or not:
py> for i in [False]:
... break if not i
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 07:51:28 -, Göktuğ Kayaalp
wrote:
Thanks for the input! I'd be quite interested in examples which required
you to "mentally transpose the conditional back to the start of the
statement", by the way.
Sorry, it's been too long and I don't have any relevant Perl arou
On 06-01-2014 03:40, Rhodri James wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 20:24:53 -, Göktuğ Kayaalp
wrote:
AFAIK, we do not have "postfix conditionals" in Python, i.e. a
condition appended to a statement, which determines whether the
statement runs or not:
py> for i in [False]:
... bre
On 1/5/2014 3:24 PM, Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK, we do not have "postfix conditionals" in Python, i.e. a condition
appended to a
statement, which determines whether the statement runs or not:
py> for i in [False]:
... break if not i
The above piece of code is equivalent to this
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 20:24:53 -, Göktuğ Kayaalp
wrote:
AFAIK, we do not have "postfix conditionals" in Python, i.e. a condition
appended to a statement, which determines whether the statement runs or
not:
py> for i in [False]:
... break if not i
The above piece of code
on that I have posted
> to python-list@python.org, so I am forwarding it to here.
> Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: Postfix conditionals
> Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14:09:14 -0800
> From: Chris Rebert
> To: Göktuğ Kayaalp
> CC: Python
--
https://mail.pyth
This was sent to me as a private reply to a question that I have posted
to python-list@python.org, so I am forwarding it to here.
Chris, please send your messages to the list, and cc the OP.
Original Message
Subject:Re: Postfix conditionals
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 14
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Göktuğ Kayaalp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK, we do not have "postfix conditionals" in Python, i.e. a condition
> appended to a
> statement, which determines whether the statement runs or not:
>
> py> for i in [False]:
> ... break if not i
>
> The above piece of c
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> Göktu€ Kayaalp wrote:
>
>>py> for i in [False]:
>>... break if not i
>
> Python is not Perl.
Personally, I find the suggested syntax jarring. I'd prefer that it
not go into Python.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailma
On 05-01-2014 22:41, Roy Smith wrote:
In article ,
Göktu€ Kayaalp wrote:
py> for i in [False]:
... break if not i
Python is not Perl.
Well done! Good for you, that you know the fact; but you are not being
constructive.
Python is not C either, but we have the while loop.
In article ,
Göktu⬠Kayaalp wrote:
>py> for i in [False]:
>... break if not i
Python is not Perl.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
14 matches
Mail list logo
