Dan wrote:
> Just starting to do some windows Client / Server programming. Which
> would you recommend? I need to create a server to fire events and
> communicate with clients over a lan. Thanks
There are plenty of Python solutions for this, most of them
work with Windows, but aren't locked to it.
Dan wrote:
> Thanks to all, my main concern about anything Microsoft picks up and
> runs with is that they vear off just slightly from the "standard" and
> freeze everyone else out like they have done with their browser,
> javascript etc.. etc... etc... So for now I will try to use Python /
> Pyth
Thanks to all, my main concern about anything Microsoft picks up and
runs with is that they vear off just slightly from the "standard" and
freeze everyone else out like they have done with their browser,
javascript etc.. etc... etc... So for now I will try to use Python /
PythonWin with the COM sup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IronPython is currently nowhere near production quality. I would not
> recommend it.
I know at least one firm developing production quality software using
IronPython, so your statement 'nowhere near' is a bit off.
They're pretty close to a full Python 2.4 implementatio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Dan wrote:
>
>> I realise its in beta. But long term, do you think that the win32com,
>>win32gui etc... will have no support because everyone jumps on the
>>Microsoft bandwagon? Aren't the windows support extensions supported
>>primarily by one guy, Mark Hammond? As a
Caleb Hattingh wrote:
> Also, I think IronPython is also supported by only one guy - Jim
> Hugunin. The fact that IronPython development is effectively being
> sponsored by Microsoft doesn't fill me with great expectations either,
> although it would be a good thing if they really supported it wel
Dan wrote:
>
> I realise its in beta. But long term, do you think that the win32com,
> win32gui etc... will have no support because everyone jumps on the
> Microsoft bandwagon? Aren't the windows support extensions supported
> primarily by one guy, Mark Hammond? As a developer, this seams to leave
Hi Dan
Pythonwin just adds support for specifically MS Windows features, most
prominently COM; writing Excel scripts in python is so cool. The
standard python distribution for windows runs perfectly on windows.
I'm not sure whether this was clear to you or not. Also, Thomas
ctypes and comtypes
Dan a écrit :
>>>IronPython is currently nowhere near production quality. I would not
>>>recommend it.
>
> I realise its in beta. But long term, do you think that the win32com,
> win32gui etc... will have no support because everyone jumps on the
> Microsoft bandwagon? Aren't the windows support e
>> IronPython is currently nowhere near production quality. I would not
>> recommend it.
I realise its in beta. But long term, do you think that the win32com,
win32gui etc... will have no support because everyone jumps on the
Microsoft bandwagon? Aren't the windows support extensions supported
pri
Casey Hawthorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Butternut squash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> IronPython is currently nowhere near production quality. I would not
>>> recommend it.
>>
>>But it's so cool.
>
> It's cool to have bugs?
>
> That really BUGS ME!
You're c
Butternut squash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> IronPython is currently nowhere near production quality. I would not
>> recommend it.
>
>But it's so cool.
It's cool to have bugs?
That really BUGS ME!
--
Regards,
Casey
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> IronPython is currently nowhere near production quality. I would not
> recommend it.
But it's so cool.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
IronPython is currently nowhere near production quality. I would not
recommend it.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
14 matches
Mail list logo
