Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote:
> "Mobile objects. Clients and servers can pass objects around - even when
> the server has never known them before. Pyro will then automatically
> transfer the needed Python bytecode."
>
> I believe that using cPickle and transferring data (but not the code) is
> stil
Paul Rubin wrote:
>Laszlo Zsolt Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>But how can I transfer pure python objects otherwise? Pyro also uses
>>Pickle and it also transfers bytecode.
>>
>>
>Pyro in the past used pickle in an insecure way. I'd heard it had
>been fixed and I didn't realize it s
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But how can I transfer pure python objects otherwise? Pyro also uses
> Pickle and it also transfers bytecode.
Pyro in the past used pickle in an insecure way. I'd heard it had
been fixed and I didn't realize it still uses pickle.
> I read somewhere
Paul Rubin wrote:
>Laszlo Zsolt Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>I already have my own classes. My objects are in object ownership
>>trees, and they are referencing to each other (weakly and
>>strongly). These classes have their own streaming methods, and they
>>can be pickled safely.
>>
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I already have my own classes. My objects are in object ownership
> trees, and they are referencing to each other (weakly and
> strongly). These classes have their own streaming methods, and they
> can be pickled safely.
Standard warning: if you're a
>Try Pyro http://pyro.sourceforge.net
>before rolling your own Python-specific protocol.
>
>
You are right. I wanted to use pyro before, because it is well tested
and it has nice features.
Unfortunately, it is not good for me. :-(
I already have my own classes. My objects are in object owners
Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote:
>>
> I need to send Python objects too. They are too elaborate to convert
> them to XML. (They are using cyclic weak references and other Python
> specific stuff.) I can be sure that on both sides, there are Python
> programs. Is there any advantage in using XML if I al
Il 2005-12-13, Laszlo Zsolt Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> I need to send Python objects too. They are too elaborate to convert
> them to XML. (They are using cyclic weak references and other Python
> specific stuff.) I can be sure that on both sides, there are Python
> programs. Is ther
Il 2005-12-12, Laszlo Zsolt Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to develop a new network protocol, where the server and the
> clients are Python programs.
You should use Twisted for this:
Writing clients
http://twistedmatrix.com/projects/core/documentation/howto/cl
Tom Anderson wrote:
>>I think to be effective, I need to use TCP_NODELAY, and manually
>>buffered transfers.
>>
>>
>Why?
>
Because of the big delays when sending small messages (size < 1500 bytes).
>Personally, i'd steer clear of doing it like this, and try to use an
>existing, language-ne
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote:
> I think to be effective, I need to use TCP_NODELAY, and manually
> buffered transfers.
Why?
> I would like to create a general messaging object that has methods like
>
> sendinteger
> recvinteger
> sendstring
> recvstring
Okay. So you're really d
> Am I on the right way to develop a new protocol?
> Are there any common mistakes that programmers do?
> Is there a howto where I can read more about this?
If you _must_ develop your own protocol, use at least twisted. But I'd
go for an existing solutions out there - namely pyro. No need to inve
12 matches
Mail list logo
