On 16 juin, 20:11, Carl Banks wrote:
> I suggest, if you intend to use this kind of thing in real code (and I
> would not recommend that) that you get in a habit of explicitly
> closing the generator after the last send(), even when you don't think
> you have to.
Very clear explanation. Thanks f
On Jun 16, 5:03 am, Jérôme Mainka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to experiment with coroutines and I don't understand why this
> snippet doesn't work as expected... In python 2.5 and python 2.6 I get
> the following output:
>
> 0
> Exception exceptions.TypeError: "'NoneType' object is not callable" in
On 06/16/2010 06:35 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:03:13 -0700, Jérôme Mainka wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I try to experiment with coroutines and I don't understand why this
>> snippet doesn't work as expected... In python 2.5 and python 2.6 I get
>> the following output:
>>
>> 0
On Jun 16, 6:35 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> How bizarre is that?
Sure...
> I have to say that your code is horribly opaque and unclear to me.
Welcome to the coroutines world :-)
This is mainly a pipeline where each function suspends execution
waiting for data (yield), and feeding other functi
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:03:13 -0700, Jérôme Mainka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to experiment with coroutines and I don't understand why this
> snippet doesn't work as expected... In python 2.5 and python 2.6 I get
> the following output:
>
> 0
> Exception exceptions.TypeError: "'NoneType' object is
On 06/16/2010 02:03 PM, Jérôme Mainka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I try to experiment with coroutines and I don't understand why this
> snippet doesn't work as expected... In python 2.5 and python 2.6 I get
> the following output:
>
> 0
> Exception exceptions.TypeError: "'NoneType' object is not callable
