On 16 juin, 20:11, Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> wrote: > I suggest, if you intend to use this kind of thing in real code (and I > would not recommend that) that you get in a habit of explicitly > closing the generator after the last send(), even when you don't think > you have to.
Very clear explanation. Thanks for the investigation... > IMHO, coroutines are the one time during the PEP-era that Python can > be accused of feature creep. All other changes seemed driven by > thoughtful analysis, this one seemed like it was, "OMG that would be > totally cool". PEP 342 doesn't give any compelling use cases (it only > gives examples of "cool things you can do with coroutines"), no > discussion on how in improves the language. Suffice to say that, > thanks to this example, I'm more averse to using them than I was > before. The wonderful David Beazley's course [1] piqued my curiosity. But, indeed, this is a hard piece difficult to master. Thanks again, Jérôme [1] http://www.dabeaz.com/coroutines/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
