Re: Application Generators

2006-07-22 Thread walterbyrd
Steve Hannah wrote: > I know that this is an older thread, but I came across it on Nabble.com. > Just wanted add some updated info on Walter's observations about Dataface > (http://fas.sfu.ca/dataface) . It is much further along in development now > and it does support authentication now. > Than

Re: Application Generators

2006-07-21 Thread Steve Hannah
I know that this is an older thread, but I came across it on Nabble.com. Just wanted add some updated info on Walter's observations about Dataface (http://fas.sfu.ca/dataface) . It is much further along in development now and it does support authentication now. Just wanted to follow this up in

Re: Application Generators

2006-04-22 Thread rajeev . tandon
Hi walterbyrd, I had also gone through this search earlier, but unfortunately the app generators generate a lot of code, and more imp is that inspite of this, they are not very close to what you really need. I had been evaluating these from time to time. Appgini is good but mostly from an academic

Re: Application Generators

2006-04-11 Thread walterbyrd
Thanks. It does look good. The personal editon costs less than phprunner. And it seems much more powerful than PHPRunner. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Application Generators

2006-04-11 Thread Chris Seymour
Have you taken a look at CodeChargeStdio (http://www.yessoftware.com)? This will handle what you are looking to do and then some. Might be a bit pricey, but it is worth a look. Cheers. Chris -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Application Generators

2006-04-11 Thread walterbyrd
In case anybody is interested, here is an update on my reviews for code generators: AppGini & PHPMagic. ($35 - $70) Cheap and easy to use, but not very functional. Okay if you are making flat-file, unsecure, CRUD. No authentication. No real relational functionallity. No event triggers. PHPRunne