On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 12:08:20 -0700
> paul.hermeneu...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> What is the possibility that MicroPython could be another build from
>> the base python.org sources? Python already gets built for a variety
>> of architectures. Coul
Hello,
On Sun, 8 Nov 2015 12:08:20 -0700
paul.hermeneu...@gmail.com wrote:
> What is the possibility that MicroPython could be another build from
> the base python.org sources? Python already gets built for a variety
> of architectures. Could a MicroPython be another one? In that way, it
> would
Hello,
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 10:28:24 -0800
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Paul Sokolovsky writes:
> > Recent 1.5 release is an important milestone for the project, major
> > changes including:
>
> Thanks for posting this. We don't hear enough about MicroPython on
> this newsgroup so it's good to get thes
What is the possibility that MicroPython could be another build from the
base python.org sources? Python already gets built for a variety of
architectures. Could a MicroPython be another one? In that way, it would
always be up to date on language changes.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Paul Rubi
Paul Sokolovsky writes:
> Recent 1.5 release is an important milestone for the project, major
> changes including:
Thanks for posting this. We don't hear enough about MicroPython on
this newsgroup so it's good to get these announcements.
Is the language still Python 3.4? Will it implement 3.5
