What is the possibility that MicroPython could be another build from the base python.org sources? Python already gets built for a variety of architectures. Could a MicroPython be another one? In that way, it would always be up to date on language changes.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote: > Paul Sokolovsky <pmis...@gmail.com> writes: > > Recent 1.5 release is an important milestone for the project, major > > changes including: > > Thanks for posting this. We don't hear enough about MicroPython on > this newsgroup so it's good to get these announcements. > > Is the language still Python 3.4? Will it implement 3.5 sometime soon? > > > 1. Advanced REPL support with smart auto-indent and auto-completion > > Hmm does this make the code footprint significantly bigger? > > > 2. Support for client SSL connections. > > Nice. Does it check the server certificate? Is it based on TLSLite by > any chance? > > > 5. There're now 2 well-supported microcontroller boards for > > MicroPython, and dozen(s) community-supported ones. > > The PyBoard is very nice, but what is the other one? I don't see > anything about it on the MicroPython web site. (Hmm, maybe you mean the > Micro Bit). > > Btw, I notice that the "store" page doesn't show any products under my > normal adblock settings. It's probably best to make it a normal page > instead of an AJAX one. > > > MicroPython supports growing subset of Python3 standard library > > (including simplified asyncio package) > > This would look much nicer with the new Python 3.5 syntax. > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
