On Thu, 22 May 2008 06:26:41 -0500
David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:47:44 +0200, pataphor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Using the trick of encapsulating the values inside single-element
> >lists one can make a transposition of the matrix and get
> >synchronici
On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:47:44 +0200, pataphor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, 20 May 2008 10:40:17 -0500
>"David C. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > > Today's little joke: Long ago I would have solved
>> > > this by storing the data as a list of rows and _also_
>> > > a list of column
On Tue, 20 May 2008 10:40:17 -0500
"David C. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Today's little joke: Long ago I would have solved
> > > this by storing the data as a list of rows and _also_
> > > a list of columns, updating each one any time the
> > > other changed. Just goes to show you th
On May 20, 10:40 am, "David C. Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
>
>
>
>
> pataphor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 May 2008 06:12:01 -0500
> > David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Well, ok. Like I said, I never _took_ the position tha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pataphor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 06:12:01 -0500
> David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, ok. Like I said, I never _took_ the position that it _should_
> > be a list of lists, I just said I didn't see the advantage to using
On Tue, 20 May 2008 06:12:01 -0500
David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, ok. Like I said, I never _took_ the position that it _should_
> be a list of lists, I just said I didn't see the advantage to using
> a single list.
I'm now thinking about a list of lists containing single elem
On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:48:03 +0200, pataphor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Mon, 19 May 2008 06:29:18 -0500
>David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Maybe you could be more specific? Various "positions" I've
>> taken in all this may well be untenable, but I can't think
>> of any that have
On Mon, 19 May 2008 06:29:18 -0500
David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe you could be more specific? Various "positions" I've
> taken in all this may well be untenable, but I can't think
> of any that have anything to do with whether the data should
> be a single list instead of a li
On Sun, 18 May 2008 18:18:34 +0200, pataphor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>> Is there some reason that would be better? It would make a lot
>> of the code more complicated. Ok, it would require only one
>> bit of added code, I suppose, b
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Is there some reason that would be better? It would make a lot
> of the code more complicated. Ok, it would require only one
> bit of added code, I suppose, but I don't see the plus side.
The plus side is you give up an untenable positi
On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:50:23 +0200, pataphor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>> >> window.pos = (x,y)
>> >>
>> >> seems more natural than
>> >>
>> >> window.SetPos(x,y);
>
>Yes, and to assign a row in a matrix I'd also like to use eithe
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> >> window.pos = (x,y)
> >>
> >> seems more natural than
> >>
> >> window.SetPos(x,y);
Yes, and to assign a row in a matrix I'd also like to use either tuples
or lists on the right side.
> def __add__(self, other):
> return
On Sat, 17 May 2008 00:27:31 -0300, "Gabriel Genellina"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>(warning: it's a rather long message)
>
>En Fri, 16 May 2008 12:58:46 -0300, David C. Ullrich
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:59:41 -0300, "Gabriel Genellina"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(warning: it's a rather long message)
En Fri, 16 May 2008 12:58:46 -0300, David C. Ullrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:59:41 -0300, "Gabriel Genellina"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
En Wed, 14 May 2008 18:15:41 -0300, David C. Ullrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
Th
On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:59:41 -0300, "Gabriel Genellina"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>En Wed, 14 May 2008 18:15:41 -0300, David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>escribió:
>
>> Having a hard time phrasing this in the form
>> of a question...
>>
>> The other day I saw a thread where someone asked
>> a
En Wed, 14 May 2008 18:15:41 -0300, David C. Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Having a hard time phrasing this in the form
> of a question...
>
> The other day I saw a thread where someone asked
> about overrideable properties and nobody offered
> the advice that properties are Bad. So may
En Wed, 14 May 2008 18:15:41 -0300, David C. Ullrich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
Having a hard time phrasing this in the form
of a question...
The other day I saw a thread where someone asked
about overrideable properties and nobody offered
the advice that properties are Bad. So maybe we've
17 matches
Mail list logo
