Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-10-26 Thread Steve Holden
Jon Perez wrote: > James Stroud wrote: > > >>"better". The only reason I want this functionality is to make my software >>available to windoze users--despite their unfortunate ignorance, they are >>people too. That's what I always say. > > > Actually, I think it's many unix/linux users who are

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-10-26 Thread Sybren Stuvel
Tim Golden enlightened us with: > Well, I'm with you. I'm sure a lot of people will chime in to point > out just how flexible and useful and productive Linux is as a > workstation, but every time I try to use it -- and I make an honest > effort -- I end up back in Windows I'm curious, what do you

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-10-26 Thread Sybren Stuvel
Jon Perez enlightened us with: > Actually, I think it's many unix/linux users who are ignorant of > just how nice, stable and productive Windows can be as a desktop > environment. I thought the same thing after spending two hours removing some adware I found. > Ever since Win2K got rid of the con

RE: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-10-26 Thread Tim Golden
> James Stroud wrote: >> "better". The only reason I want this functionality is to make my software >> available to windoze users--despite their unfortunate ignorance, they are >> people too. That's what I always say. Jon Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, I think it's many unix/linux

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-10-26 Thread Thomas Heller
Jon Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > James Stroud wrote: > >> "better". The only reason I want this functionality is to make my software >> available to windoze users--despite their unfortunate ignorance, they are >> people too. That's what I always say. > > Actually, I think it's many unix/lin

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-10-26 Thread Jon Perez
James Stroud wrote: > "better". The only reason I want this functionality is to make my software > available to windoze users--despite their unfortunate ignorance, they are > people too. That's what I always say. Actually, I think it's many unix/linux users who are ignorant of just how nice, stab

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-19 Thread James Stroud
On Saturday 17 September 2005 10:29, Tim Roberts wrote: > James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I think the motivation is to ween people off of M$ products altogether, > > Well, CrossOver Office doesn't really do that. You're still running > Microsoft Office. > > >...to get > >them used to wo

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-19 Thread Caleb Hattingh
The other thing (and this is always true) is that "better" needs definition. On purely technical grounds, on average, MSOffice is better than OO. However, holistically, OO is probably better (no lock-in, open standards, multiplatform and so on). Those soft issues do matter. On Mon, 19 Sep

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-19 Thread Christophe
Tim Roberts a écrit : > James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I think the motivation is to ween people off of M$ products altogether, > > > Well, CrossOver Office doesn't really do that. You're still running > Microsoft Office. > > >>...to get >>them used to working an a unix environm

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-17 Thread Tim Roberts
James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I think the motivation is to ween people off of M$ products altogether, Well, CrossOver Office doesn't really do that. You're still running Microsoft Office. >...to get >them used to working an a unix environment and to the idea of using open >altern

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-15 Thread Jorge Godoy
James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "better". The only reason I want this functionality is to make my software > available to windoze users--despite their unfortunate ignorance, they are > people too. That's what I always say. +1 QOTW... -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-15 Thread James Stroud
I think the motivation is to ween people off of M$ products altogether, to get them used to working an a unix environment and to the idea of using open alternatives rather than thinking that commercial software is somehow "better". The only reason I want this functionality is to make my software

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-15 Thread Tim Roberts
James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >My department has switched from vmware to wine/cxoffice. Fascinating. If you don't mind, and if others don't mind an off-topic diversion, can you spend a few minutes explaining what led to this decision? Wine is pretty good, but it will never be as thor

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-13 Thread Thomas Heller
James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > My department has switched from vmware to wine/cxoffice. I have been > playing with this all morning, and I've gotten this far. If someone > has done this, could you point me in the right direction > > > euler 65% winpy > Enthought Edition buil

Re: p2exe using wine/cxoffice

2005-09-13 Thread Larry Bates
I know Thomas Heller monitors this list but you should probably post this to gmane.comp.python.py2exe as it is the py2exe newsgroup. FYI, Larry Bates James Stroud wrote: > Hello, > > My department has switched from vmware to wine/cxoffice. I have been playing > with this all morning, and I've g