On 2024-12-27, Chris Green via Python-list wrote:
> Cameron Simpson wrote:
>> On 25Dec2024 14:52, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
>> >I have been following discussions on Discourse (discuss.python.org)
>> >these last times.
>> >
>> >I think that it definitely lacks some of the joys of the maili
On 12/27/24 00:58, Chris Green via Python-list wrote:
Yes, it's the one saving grace of a Discourse forum, you can use it by
E-Mail and it behaves quite nicely with a text mode E-Mail client such
as mutt so you can keep threads separate, follow sub-threads, etc.
Not quite as good as this list g
Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 25Dec2024 14:52, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> >I have been following discussions on Discourse (discuss.python.org)
> >these last times.
> >
> >I think that it definitely lacks some of the joys of the mailing list:
>
> FYI, it has a very good "mailing list" mode.
On 12/29/24 15:10, Cameron Simpson via Python-list wrote:
On 29Dec2024 07:16, Kevin M. Wilson wrote:
Excuse please, my failure. As I have not been following this
discussion, why is the subject "Python List Is NOT Dead" a subject for
discussion? Has the list been moving towards closing?
No, t
On 29Dec2024 07:16, Kevin M. Wilson wrote:
Excuse please, my failure. As I have not been following this discussion, why is the
subject "Python List Is NOT Dead" a subject for discussion? Has the list been
moving towards closing?
No, the list's still around. But there was a significant migrat
Excuse please, my failure. As I have not been following this discussion, why is
the subject "Python List Is NOT Dead" a subject for discussion? Has the list
been moving towards closing?
KMW
***
"When you pass through the waters, I will be with you:
thank you Mr. Jahangir.
you are expert in python.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 2:28 AM Cameron Simpson via Python-list <
python-list@python.org> wrote:
> On 25Dec2024 14:52, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
> >I have been following discussions on Discourse (discuss.python.org)
> >these last times.
> >
On 25Dec2024 14:52, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote:
I have been following discussions on Discourse (discuss.python.org)
these last times.
I think that it definitely lacks some of the joys of the mailing list:
FYI, it has a very good "mailing list" mode. I use it that was >90% of
the time, a
On 25/12/24 23:52, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer via Python-list wrote:
Hey all,
I have been following discussions on Discourse (discuss.python.org) these
last times.
I think that it definitely lacks some of the joys of the mailing list:
1/ Categories
The discussion has fixed categories. No channe
Abdur-Rahmaan. Good afternoon!
I think, that if project Discourse would want to preserve and increase
its popularity, then it should realize XMPP PubSub to communicate and
manage posts, which is what project Libervia will do in near future.
I use BitMessage, Email, LXMF, MQTT, and XMPP to communi
> whereas I am quite sure that program flows do not overlap.
You can never be sure of this in Python. Virtually all objects in
Python are allocated on heap, so instantiating integers, doing simple
arithmetic etc. -- all of this requires synchronization because it
will allocate memory for a shared
On 10/2/2024 7:26 AM, Guenther Sohler wrote:
My Software project is working fine in most of the cases
(www.pythonscad.org)
however I am right now isolating a scenario, which makes it crash
permanently.
It does not happen with Python 3.11.6 (and possibly below), it happens with
3.12 and above
I
On 9/18/24 08:49, Ulrich Goebel via Python-list wrote:
Hi,
Debian Linux seems to love Python 3.7 - that is shown by apt-get list, and it's
installed on my Debian Server.
But I need at least Python 3.8
Is there a repository which I can give to apt to get Python 3.8 or later?
Or do I really ha
On 9/18/2024 10:49 AM, Ulrich Goebel via Python-list wrote:
Hi,
Debian Linux seems to love Python 3.7 - that is shown by apt-get list, and it's
installed on my Debian Server.
But I need at least Python 3.8
Is there a repository which I can give to apt to get Python 3.8 or later?
Or do I real
On 19/09/24 02:49, Ulrich Goebel via Python-list wrote:
Hi,
Debian Linux seems to love Python 3.7 - that is shown by apt-get list, and it's
installed on my Debian Server.
But I need at least Python 3.8
Is there a repository which I can give to apt to get Python 3.8 or later?
Or do I really h
Python 3.7 is part of Buster (Debian old old stable)
If you moved to Debian bullseye you would get offered 3.9 (old stable)
Currently the stable version (Bookworm) would give you 3.11
I am not aware of anyone maintaining a repo for old Debian versions to get
newer Python versions. But I know in
You can try:
>>> 1,2 == 2,2
(1, True, 2)
Its the same as:
>>> 1, (2 == 2), 2
(1, True, 2)
Hope this helps!
Alan Bawden schrieb:
Python 3.10.5 (v3.10.5:f37715, Jul 10 2022, 00:26:17) [GCC 4.9.2] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>
> On 6 Aug 2024, at 07:11, aotto1968 via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> I know but I use a thread like a process because the "conversation" between
> the threads is done by my
> software. a Thread is usually faster to startup (thread-pool) this mean for
> high-load this is
> significant faster ev
On 06.08.24 04:34, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2024-08-05, aotto1968 via Python-list wrote:
Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters
in one process, each using a thread?
By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the
interpreters and thus the C API can be us
On 06.08.24 02:32, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 23:19:14 +0200, aotto1968 wrote:
Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters in
one process, each using a thread?
By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the interpreters
and thus the C API
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 08:48, aotto1968 via Python-list
wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters in one
> process, each using a thread?
>
> By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the interpreters and
> thus the C API can be used withou
On 2024-08-05, aotto1968 via Python-list wrote:
> Is it possible to run two completely independent Python interpreters
> in one process, each using a thread?
>
> By independent, I mean that no data is shared between the
> interpreters and thus the C API can be used without any other
> "lock/GIL"
I see the literal 'escape' character + 'k', when it should
let me edit previous commands.
I did have to compile my own python because I'm using 2.7 on
this machine.
I figured it out. I needed to apt install libreadline-dev.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
For this to work, the Python implementation should use the same
readline library as your shell, I guess.
It works in python3, so I guess my problem is that I'm
compiling python (I think kubuntu dropped python2), but
I don't see any relevant options in the configure help.
--
https://m
Daniel via Python-list writes:
> One thing missing is a good textmode irc client that will connect to
> quassel core.
>
> I've seen efforts to make a plugin for weechat but, to date, I don't see much
> progress on that end.
>
> In your wisdom, would python be a good environment to accomplish this
inhahe writes:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:14 AM Daniel via Python-list <
> python-list@python.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys -
>>
>> I have historical experience developing sofwtare for my own use. It has
>> been
>> quite a while since doing so and the advent of new languages has brought me
>> here. Py
Hi.
Just FYI, I use Erc (in Emacs). I'm not a very advanced user, perhaps,
but I never felt like I miss anything. That's not to stop you from
making your own, but if you just need a decent text client for IRC,
then there's already at least one.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 11:30 AM inhahe via Python-li
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:22 AM inhahe wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:14 AM Daniel via Python-list <
> python-list@python.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> In your wisdom, would python be a good environment to accomplish this?
>
>
> I think Python would be a great language to write an IRC client in, it'
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 5:14 AM Daniel via Python-list <
python-list@python.org> wrote:
> Hi guys -
>
> I have historical experience developing sofwtare for my own use. It has
> been
> quite a while since doing so and the advent of new languages has brought me
> here. Python has built quite a reput
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 03:42, jak via Python-list wrote:
>
> Loris Bennett ha scritto:
> > r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
> >
> >>Me (indented by 2) and the chatbot (flush left). Lines lengths > 72!
> >
> > Is there a name for this kind of indentation, i.e. the stuff you are
> > w
Loris Bennett ha scritto:
r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
Me (indented by 2) and the chatbot (flush left). Lines lengths > 72!
Is there a name for this kind of indentation, i.e. the stuff you are
writing not being flush left? It is sort of contrary to
what I think of as "norm
Stefan Ram ha scritto:
r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote or quoted:
translation services are gonna interpret line breaks as
I just beefed up my posting program to replace "gonna".
Now I won't come across like some street thug, but rather
as a respectable member of human soci
On 2024-05-02 16:34:38 +0200, Loris Bennett via Python-list wrote:
> r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
> > Me (indented by 2) and the chatbot (flush left). Lines lengths > 72!
>
> Is there a name for this kind of indentation, i.e. the stuff you are
> writing not being flush left?
Ram
Lawrence D'Oliveiro writes:
> Assume you have an expression "s.replace('a','b').replace('c','d').
> replace('e','f').replace('g','h')". Its value is a string which
> is the value of s, but with "a" replaced by "b", "c" replaced by
> "d", "e" replaced by "f" and "g" replaced by "h". Ho
r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
> Me (indented by 2) and the chatbot (flush left). Lines lengths > 72!
Is there a name for this kind of indentation, i.e. the stuff you are
writing not being flush left? It is sort of contrary to
what I think of as "normal" indentation. You seem to
On 2/6/24 10:46 PM, Jim via Python-list wrote:
Friends,
Please forgive me if this is not the proper forum for dealing with an issue of mine, but
I am at a loss in finding a fix for a python problem in the program ClipGrab. The program
allows one to download videos or audios from YouTube and oth
Am 17.01.2024 um 19:44 schrieb Mats Wichmann via Python-list:
Be interesting to know if your WIndows 10 has those files in place, and
it's just a missing path entry (a good thing, perhaps) that's causing it
not to be found there.
Yes. Python is not on the Path - by design.
while the new Wi
Am 16.01.2024 um 23:44 schrieb Barry via Python-list:
On 16 Jan 2024, at 17:11, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
wrote:
while the new Windows 11 machine finds the Microsoft stub
You can turn off the stub in windows settings. The magic windows jargon is
“App Execution Aliases”. Once you fin
On 1/16/24 10:00, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
Am 15.01.2024 um 23:55 schrieb Mats Wichmann via Python-list:
On 1/15/24 12:01, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On 1/15/2024 1:26 PM, Mats Wichmann via Python-list wrote:
Python from the App Store is not the same as Python from pytho
> On 16 Jan 2024, at 17:11, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> while the new Windows 11 machine finds the Microsoft stub
You can turn off the stub in windows settings. The magic windows jargon is
“App Execution Aliases”. Once you find it in settings you can turn off
the python and p
Am 15.01.2024 um 23:55 schrieb Mats Wichmann via Python-list:
On 1/15/24 12:01, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On 1/15/2024 1:26 PM, Mats Wichmann via Python-list wrote:
Python from the App Store is not the same as Python from python.org:
yes. this question is about the python.org distri
On 1/15/2024 7:24 PM, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 1/15/2024 6:27 PM, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote:
On 16/01/24 11:55 am, Mats Wichmann wrote:
Windows natively has something called python.exe and python3.exe
which is interfering here
I'm wondering whether py.exe should be taught to recognise t
On 1/15/2024 6:27 PM, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote:
On 16/01/24 11:55 am, Mats Wichmann wrote:
Windows natively has something called python.exe and python3.exe which
is interfering here
I'm wondering whether py.exe should be taught to recognise these stubs
and ignore them. This sounds like
On 16/01/24 11:55 am, Mats Wichmann wrote:
Windows
natively has something called python.exe and python3.exe which is
interfering here
I'm wondering whether py.exe should be taught to recognise these stubs
and ignore them. This sounds like something that could trip a lot of
people up.
--
Greg
On 1/15/24 12:01, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On 1/15/2024 1:26 PM, Mats Wichmann via Python-list wrote:
On 1/15/24 09:44, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
First and foremost I want to understand why I'm seeing this:
- Python scripts with "/usr/bin/env python3" as shebang line
On 1/15/2024 1:26 PM, Mats Wichmann via Python-list wrote:
On 1/15/24 09:44, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
First and foremost I want to understand why I'm seeing this:
- Python scripts with "/usr/bin/env python3" as shebang line work as
expected on a computer with Windows 10 and Pyth
On 1/15/24 09:44, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
In the Python documentation for versions 3.11 and 3.12 I found no
differences regarding py.exe and shebang lines.
Then I removed the "/env" from the shebang lines and could start the
scripts from the second computer. That certainly is a
On 1/15/24 09:44, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
First and foremost I want to understand why I'm seeing this:
- Python scripts with "/usr/bin/env python3" as shebang line work as
expected on a computer with Windows 10 and Python 3.11.5. They have
worked for years on this machine, usin
Am 15.01.2024 um 00:46 schrieb Mike Dewhirst via Python-list:
In Windows the provided methods for running complex command lines are either a
batch file or a shortcut.Someone very kindly pointed out to me in this thread
that there is a PEP for py.exe. I don't use py.exe originally because I didn
4 23:59 (GMT+10:00) To:
python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Python 3.12.1, Windows 11: shebang line
#!/usr/bin/env python3
doesn't work any more Am 09.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Barry Scott via
Python-list:> > >> On 7 Jan 2024, at 15:09, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
w
On 1/14/2024 8:54 AM, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On 1/14/2024 7:48 AM, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
Am 09.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Barry Scott via Python-list:
On 7 Jan 2024, at 15:09, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
wrote:
Oh, and the two Windows and Python versions a
On 1/14/2024 7:48 AM, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
Am 09.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Barry Scott via Python-list:
On 7 Jan 2024, at 15:09, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
wrote:
Oh, and the two Windows and Python versions are on two different
computers.
Will remove the "/env" fro
Am 09.01.2024 um 12:36 schrieb Barry Scott via Python-list:
On 7 Jan 2024, at 15:09, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
wrote:
Oh, and the two Windows and Python versions are on two different computers.
Will remove the "/env" from my shebang lines, even if I don't understand what's
happening
> On 7 Jan 2024, at 15:09, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> Oh, and the two Windows and Python versions are on two different computers.
>
> Will remove the "/env" from my shebang lines, even if I don't understand
> what's happening.
Thanks for the details.
Only thing I can thi
Am 01.01.2024 um 12:50 schrieb Barry via Python-list:
On 1 Jan 2024, at 11:14, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
wrote:
But in all this thread I didn't see a single explanation for my current
situation: one and the same shebang line works on Windows 10 / Python 3.11 and
doesn't work on Wind
> On 2 Jan 2024, at 17:24, Thomas Passin via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> You might learn about this if you happen to read and remember the right part
> of the Python docs. Otherwise you have no idea what py.exe is up to nor how
> it does it. I would say that most people don't know there's an
On 1/2/2024 11:56 AM, Mats Wichmann via Python-list wrote:
On 1/1/24 12:53, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On Windows 10, a shebang line gets ignored in favor of Python 3.9.9
(if invoked by the script name alone) or Python 3.12.1 (if invoked by
the "py" launcher).
fwiw, you can also cr
On 1/1/24 12:53, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On Windows 10, a shebang line gets ignored in favor of Python 3.9.9 (if
invoked by the script name alone) or Python 3.12.1 (if invoked by the
"py" launcher).
fwiw, you can also create an ini file to define to the launcher py which
version
On 1/1/2024 12:26 PM, Mats Wichmann via Python-list wrote:
On 1/1/24 07:11, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
Here's how to find out what program Windows thinks it should use to
run a ".py" file. In a console:
C:\Users\tom>assoc .py
.py=Python.File
C:\Users\tom>ftype Python.file
Python.f
On 1/1/24 07:11, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
Here's how to find out what program Windows thinks it should use to run
a ".py" file. In a console:
C:\Users\tom>assoc .py
.py=Python.File
C:\Users\tom>ftype Python.file
Python.file="C:\Windows\py.exe" "%L" %*
That's not enough. There i
On 1/1/24 04:02, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
Am 30.12.2023 um 04:04 schrieb Mike Dewhirst via Python-list:
I had assumed the OP had installed Python from the Microsoft shop and
that's where py.exe must have come from.
In fact I didn't say in my post that I always get Python from
On 1/1/2024 8:19 AM, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On 1/1/2024 6:02 AM, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
Am 30.12.2023 um 04:04 schrieb Mike Dewhirst via Python-list:
I had assumed the OP had installed Python from the Microsoft shop and
that's where py.exe must have come from.
On 1/1/2024 6:02 AM, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
Am 30.12.2023 um 04:04 schrieb Mike Dewhirst via Python-list:
I had assumed the OP had installed Python from the Microsoft shop and
that's where py.exe must have come from.
In fact I didn't say in my post that I always get Python
> On 1 Jan 2024, at 11:14, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> But in all this thread I didn't see a single explanation for my current
> situation: one and the same shebang line works on Windows 10 / Python 3.11
> and doesn't work on Windows 11 / Python 3.12. I suspect Windows, bec
Am 30.12.2023 um 04:04 schrieb Mike Dewhirst via Python-list:
I had assumed the OP had installed Python from the Microsoft shop and
that's where py.exe must have come from.
In fact I didn't say in my post that I always get Python from
python.org. When I started to use the language there wa
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 14:06, Mike Dewhirst via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 29/12/2023 12:09 pm, Félix An via Python-list wrote:
> > On 2023-12-25 12:36, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
> >>
> >> 3. You cannot trust Microsoft. You can trust Python Software
> >> Foundation. Python from PSF works the same in all
On 29/12/2023 12:09 pm, Félix An via Python-list wrote:
On 2023-12-25 12:36, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
3. You cannot trust Microsoft. You can trust Python Software
Foundation. Python from PSF works the same in all environments - or
if not it is a bug. Python from Microsoft is tweaked to satisfy th
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 12:23, Félix An via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2023-12-25 12:36, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
> >
> > 3. You cannot trust Microsoft. You can trust Python Software Foundation.
> > Python from PSF works the same in all environments - or if not it is a bug.
> > Python from Microsoft i
On 2023-12-25 12:36, Mike Dewhirst wrote:
3. You cannot trust Microsoft. You can trust Python Software Foundation. Python
from PSF works the same in all environments - or if not it is a bug. Python
from Microsoft is tweaked to satisfy their aforementioned strategy of locking
in users to Windo
ython-list Subject: Re: Python 3.12.1, Windows
11: shebang line #!/usr/bin/env python3
doesn't work any more On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 at 15:42, Mike Dewhirst via
Python-list wrote:>> Apologies for top posting - my
phone seems unable to do otherwise.>> Here's my view - which
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 22:55:34 +, Barry wrote:
>> On 24 Dec 2023, at 00:54, rbowman via Python-list
>> wrote:
>>
>> Does that work with virtualenv or conda? I'm slowly getting up to speed
>> with those.
>
> Conda is its own thing, not need for py.exe.
>
> Once you have created the venv you d
On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 at 15:42, Mike Dewhirst via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Apologies for top posting - my phone seems unable to do otherwise.
>
> Here's my view - which may not be popular.
You're right about that part, anyhow :)
> 4. Shebang lines are pretty much redundant now that most python inter
Apologies for top posting - my phone seems unable to do otherwise.
Here's my view - which may not be popular.
1. Py.exe is an awful idea.
2. Installing python in %PROGRAMFILES% is not a good idea
3. Installing Python from a Microsoft shop or server is a bad idea
4. Shebang lines are pretty mu
> On 24 Dec 2023, at 00:54, rbowman via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> Does that work with virtualenv or conda? I'm slowly getting up to speed
> with those.
Conda is its own thing, not need for py.exe.
Once you have created the venv you do not need py.exe as you will have
pythob.exe in the venv
On 12/22/23 20:16, rbowman via Python-list wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:27:58 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
>
>> Using the py launcher as your Windows association with .py and.pyw files
>> you can have multiple versions of python installed and everything works
>> as it should, according to your
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 17:27:58 -0700, Michael Torrie wrote:
> Using the py launcher as your Windows association with .py and.pyw files
> you can have multiple versions of python installed and everything works
> as it should, according to your shebang, just like on Unix.
Does that work with virtuale
On 12/22/23 20:56, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
> It's just better not to make assumptions about which version of Python
> will be running. Just specify it yourself when you can, and then you can
> be sure.
Precisely, which is why the shebang is so useful, even on Windows with
py launche
> On 23 Dec 2023, at 03:01, Thomas Passin via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> Not on my system. It may depend on whether Python gets installed to Program
> Files or to %USERPROFILE%/AppData/Local/Programs/Python. Python 3.9 is the
> last verson I installed to Program Files, and that's the version
On 2023-12-22 22:56:45 -0500, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
> In my experience one should always make sure to know what version of Python
> is being used, at least if there is more than one version installed on the
> computer. Even on Linux using a shebang line can be tricky, because you ar
On 12/22/2023 7:27 PM, Michael Torrie via Python-list wrote:
On 12/22/23 07:02, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
On my Windows 10 machine, Python scripts run without a shebang line.
Perhaps Windows 11 has added the ability to use one, but then you would
need to use the actual location of you
On 12/22/2023 7:19 PM, Barry wrote:
On 23 Dec 2023, at 00:15, Thomas Passin via Python-list
wrote:
In neither case is the shebang line used.
As i understand it, not in front of my windows box to check.
The handler for .py file extension is set to be the py.exe
It is py.exe that understand
On 12/22/23 07:02, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
> On my Windows 10 machine, Python scripts run without a shebang line.
> Perhaps Windows 11 has added the ability to use one, but then you would
> need to use the actual location of your Python executable.
Yes if you associate .py or .pyw w
On 12/22/23 11:42, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
> There is some important context that is missing here. Python on Windows
> does not normally install to that location. That is not even a Windows
> path, neither by directory name nor by path separators.
No, that's just the way the py la
> On 23 Dec 2023, at 00:15, Thomas Passin via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> In neither case is the shebang line used.
As i understand it, not in front of my windows box to check.
The handler for .py file extension is set to be the py.exe
It is py.exe that understands shebang lines.
Barry
--
h
On 12/22/2023 9:29 AM, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
Am 22.12.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Barry:
On 22 Dec 2023, at 12:39, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
wrote:
Hello,
I always install Python on Windows in the same manner:
- Python is not on the path,
- it is installed for all users
On 12/22/2023 7:36 AM, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list wrote:
Hello,
I always install Python on Windows in the same manner:
- Python is not on the path,
- it is installed for all users,
- the Python Launcher is installed for all users,
- the file types .py, .pyw etc. are associated with Python.
> On 22 Dec 2023, at 14:58, Christian Buhtz via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> On Windows 11 it usually is the "Terminal" which is different from cmd.exe.
In terminal app you can run cmd.exe or powershell, so it is basically the same.
Barry
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-li
> On 22 Dec 2023, at 14:29, Sibylle Koczian wrote:
>
> #!/usr/bin/env/python
That was what i thought you had and it will not work.
The BOM suggestion is worth trying.
Barry
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What is the "command line" on your Windows 11?
On Windows 10 it usually is "cmd.exe" (Windows Command Prompt).
On Windows 11 it usually is the "Terminal" which is different from
cmd.exe.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 22/12/2023 13.36, Sibylle Koczian wrote:
Hello,
I always install Python on Windows in the same manner:
- Python is not on the path,
- it is installed for all users,
- the Python Launcher is installed for all users,
- the file types .py, .pyw etc. are associated with Python.
My shebang line
Am 22.12.2023 um 14:13 schrieb Barry:
On 22 Dec 2023, at 12:39, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
wrote:
Hello,
I always install Python on Windows in the same manner:
- Python is not on the path,
- it is installed for all users,
- the Python Launcher is installed for all users,
- the file
> On 22 Dec 2023, at 12:39, Sibylle Koczian via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I always install Python on Windows in the same manner:
>
> - Python is not on the path,
> - it is installed for all users,
> - the Python Launcher is installed for all users,
> - the file types .py, .pyw etc
On 2023-11-07, wrote:
> Discussions like this feel a bit silly after a while. How long
> something is to type on a command line is not a major issue and
> brevity can lead to being hard to remember too especially using
> obscure references.
Of course it's silly, that's why it's called "golf"!
I
python.org
Subject: Re: Python Golf
On 2023-11-07, Stefan Ram wrote:
> I read this in a shell newsgroup:
>
> perl -anE '$s += $F[1]; END {say $s}' in
>
> , so I wrote
>
> py -c "import sys; print(sum(int(F.split()[1])for F in sys.stdin))"
> to show
On 2023-11-07, Stefan Ram wrote:
> I read this in a shell newsgroup:
>
> perl -anE '$s += $F[1]; END {say $s}' in
>
> , so I wrote
>
> py -c "import sys; print(sum(int(F.split()[1])for F in sys.stdin))"
> to show that this is possible with Python too.
>
> But now people complain that it'
I don 't understand the meaning of this mail Verzonden vanaf mijn Galaxy
Oorspronkelijk bericht Van: python-list-requ...@python.org
Datum: 04-11-23 17:01 (GMT+01:00) Aan: python-list@python.org Onderwerp:
Python-list Digest, Vol 242, Issue 3 Send Python-list mailing list submis
On 2023-10-02 19:44:12 +0300, אורי via Python-list wrote:
> I have an issue since about 5 months now. Python 3.12.0 venv not working
> with psycopg2 on Windows. I created 2 issues on GitHub but they were
> closed. I checked today with the new Python release but it's still not
> working.
>
> https:
On 17/09/2023 13.20, James Greenham via Python-list wrote:
Hello,
On the face of it, the Python-Mac mailing list is largely inactive so I'm
posting here since it looks like this one is livelier.
What happens when doGrab() is called from the REPL, after being 'fed'
data you expect is valid?
On 9/13/2023 11:39 PM, Jacob Keeler via Python-list wrote:
I downloaded Python 3.11.5, and there was nothing in the “Scripts” file,
and there was no Pip. I would like to know why.
I just downloaded the 3.11.5 64-bit installer for Windows from
python.org and ran it. This was an upgrade since I
On 9/13/2023 11:39 PM, Jacob Keeler via Python-list wrote:
I downloaded Python 3.11.5, and there was nothing in the “Scripts” file,
and there was no Pip. I would like to know why.
What do you mean by "downloaded"? And are you talking about Windows?
Did you download the installer from python.or
1 - 100 of 3074 matches
Mail list logo
