John Nagle a écrit :
(snip)
MySQLdb is available only up to Python 2.5.
Huh ???
Python 2.6.2 (release26-maint, Apr 19 2009, 01:56:41)
[GCC 4.3.3] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import MySQLdb
/var/lib/python-support/python2.6/MySQLdb/__in
Ed Singleton a écrit :
On Aug 26, 4:17 am, alex23 wrote:
Frameworks created for the sake of creating a framework, as opposed to
those written to meet a defined need, tend to be the worst examples of
masturbatory coding.
Indeed, but masturbation is perfectly healthy and acceptable, and we
all
On Aug 26, 4:17 am, alex23 wrote:
> Frameworks created for the sake of creating a framework, as opposed to
> those written to meet a defined need, tend to be the worst examples of
> masturbatory coding.
Indeed, but masturbation is perfectly healthy and acceptable, and we
all do it every now and t
John Nagle a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>> If you're only writing your framework for learning purposes, you could
>> as well go with Python 3, and implement everything from the ground up
>> (not a trivial task FWIW).
>
>Python 3 isn't ready for prime time on web servers. Too many ma
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
If you're only writing your framework for learning purposes, you could
as well go with Python 3, and implement everything from the ground up
(not a trivial task FWIW).
Python 3 isn't ready for prime time on web servers. Too many major modules,
haven't been ported
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
A few additional comments on top of what others have said.
On Aug 26, 11:09 am, Phil wrote:
As I've read elsewhere, "These days, FastCGI is never used directly.
Actually, FCGI works quite well. Sitetruth's AdRater
(http://www.sitetruth.com/downloads/adrater.html)
Phil a écrit :
When
I gave that arbitrary percentage, I was basing it off of the
information I had seen with regards to launching applications built
with existing frameworks using lighttpd. I do realize I was missing a
lot of information by looking up something that specific.
Indeed !-)
I al
Haha. While I don't disagree with you, I seem to be under the
impression that you think I haven't been reading the web where nearly
every blog post complains about the abundance of Python frameworks.
The thing is, most of the frameworks being commented on in such a way
are 'microframeworks' that pr
In article ,
Phil wrote:
>
>My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
>I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
>I actually have no applications that I wish to develop. I enjoy
>developing these kinds of things from scratch as a learning
>
Thanks Graham. I actually ended up reading that blog post from a
Google search last night before I saw your response. It was very
informative.
Bruno, I will take a look at those groups to expand my knowledge. When
I gave that arbitrary percentage, I was basing it off of the
information I had seen
Phil a écrit :
(snip)
However, 99.9% of the discussion I see with Python on
the web is around FCGI.
May I suggest you spend some time reading django-users and django-dev on
google groups ? (and that's only *one* of the way-too-many Python web
frameworks).
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, Phil wrote:
> Thanks a lot for another response. I've never posted in groups like
> this before but the results are amazing.
>
> I will definitely consider trying mod_wsgi when I get a chance. I like
> the approach taken with it. It is unfortunate that I completely missed
> all
Thanks a lot for another response. I've never posted in groups like
this before but the results are amazing.
I will definitely consider trying mod_wsgi when I get a chance. I like
the approach taken with it. It is unfortunate that I completely missed
all Apache related material because I was using
ded module. That module
> would then serve the function of both FCGI and the 'WSGI Server' in my
> diagram? That actually sounds really neat. Unfortunately I missed this
> because I've been hooked on lighttpd, as the minimalist I am.
>
> Here are the things I am still c
ve been hooked on lighttpd, as the minimalist I am.
Here are the things I am still confused with:
1) Why do I not want to consider running Python on the web with FCGI,
without WSGI? You said 'no' straight up, no questions asked. I would
imagine that there is a good reason of course, as
it is only used for the deployment of WSGI
applications." As far as I understand, the main (or only?) reasoning
for this is because WSGI makes Python applications easier to deploy
without having to worry about whether using FCGI/SCGI/CGI.
Nor about which web server you use (Apache, lighthtt
r as I understand, the main (or only?) reasoning
> for this is because WSGI makes Python applications easier to deploy
> without having to worry about whether using FCGI/SCGI/CGI.
WSGI provides for portability, it isn't necessarily easier to use than
mod_python.
> What would be inv
On Aug 26, 1:17 pm, alex23 wrote:
> Phil wrote:
> > My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
> > I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
> > I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
>
> No offense intended, but that's prob
On Aug 25, 11:17 pm, alex23 wrote:
> Phil wrote:
> > My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
> > I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
> > I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
>
> No offense intended, but that's pro
Phil wrote:
> My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
> I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
> I actually have no applications that I wish to develop.
No offense intended, but that's probably the worst approach to take.
Frameworks c
Thank you for the helpful and timely response.
My interest in Python 3.1 was actually to develop a framework. Again,
I can feel the flames. :) I understand there are enough frameworks but
I actually have no applications that I wish to develop. I enjoy
developing these kinds of things from scratch
imary reason for WSGI, in my mind. There are other things
like the composability of applications, but the decoupling of application
authoring from deployment is the sine qua non, in my opinion.
What would be involved to run Python on the web using FCGI without
WSGI? I can feel the flames already.
erstand, the main (or only?) reasoning
for this is because WSGI makes Python applications easier to deploy
without having to worry about whether using FCGI/SCGI/CGI.
What would be involved to run Python on the web using FCGI without
WSGI? I can feel the flames already. This isn't the only reason I wa
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Atul. wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Needless to say I am new to python and web programming. I am looking
> for a quick Python-101 course / tutorial for "using python to
> implement dynamic content on web" under some web server. Any pointers
> what should I be reading?
Go
Hello All,
Needless to say I am new to python and web programming. I am looking
for a quick Python-101 course / tutorial for "using python to
implement dynamic content on web" under some web server. Any pointers
what should I be reading?
Regards,
Atul.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Sep 3, 8:41 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SimonPalmer a écrit :
>
> > Apologies in advance if this is either a) the wrong board or b) been
> > answered a million times elsewhere, but...
>
> > I have been given an assignment to get a python module up and running
> > behind
SimonPalmer a écrit :
Apologies in advance if this is either a) the wrong board or b) been
answered a million times elsewhere, but...
I have been given an assignment to get a python module up and running
behind an existing web site. At the moment the rest of the site is
developed in PHP but the
Apologies in advance if this is either a) the wrong board or b) been
answered a million times elsewhere, but...
I have been given an assignment to get a python module up and running
behind an existing web site. At the moment the rest of the site is
developed in PHP but the hosts have said they wi
28 matches
Mail list logo
