On Sep 4, 1:53 pm, "OKB (not okblacke)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> George Sakkis wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 8:35 am, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:32:23 -, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >Here are the statistics from Google Trends:
>
> >> >http
The expression "faint praise" comes to mind.
--
--Bryan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>So, all the decline means is that the number of searches
> for "Python programming" releative to all searches done is declining.
Which makes sense. There are an many python tutorial/code snippet
sites, sites that list those type of python sites, as well as the
python.org site which means that a
George Sakkis wrote:
> On Sep 4, 8:35 am, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:32:23 -, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >Here are the statistics from Google Trends:
>>
>> >http://benyang22a.blogspot.com/2007/09/perl-vs-python.html
>>
>> >From the graph
> So I think we can at least say from the chart that searches combining
> the terms 'python' and 'programming' have been falling, by some
> unquantifiable amount (it don't _look_ like much!?), relative to the
> number of total searches.
I think it is the search volume relative to the total number
On Sep 4, 8:35 am, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:32:23 -, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Here are the statistics from Google Trends:
>
> >http://benyang22a.blogspot.com/2007/09/perl-vs-python.html
>
> >From the graph, it seems more accurate to say th
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:32:23 -, Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here are the statistics from Google Trends:
>
>http://benyang22a.blogspot.com/2007/09/perl-vs-python.html
>
>From the graph, it seems more accurate to say that Perl is undertaking Python.
Jean-Paul
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
> This chart is showing that amount of python programers is smaller every
> year :(
I saw an article maybe a year ago, regarding "best careers" that
completely contradicted previous articles I had seen in years gone by.
It said that the number of people in programming and related jobs
would decli
On Sep 4, 11:49 am, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who knows? The graph has no labeling or calibration for the y-axis, so
> it's meaningless.
>
Well yes, some calibration would make it more meaningful, but it is at
least labeled 'Search Volume.' What's worse the calibration chang
I believe that the time-trend chart show the normalized volumes,
relative to the total Google search volume, so a decreasing trend
doesn't mean a decreasing absolute volume. The trends of "Los
Angeles", "China" searches are decreasing over the last three years,
but the absolute volumes should not b
Asun Friere wrote:
> How do you figure that? Isn't the chart showing the frequency of
> those particular terms combined as a fraction of the total search
> volume on Google?
Who knows? The graph has no labeling or calibration for the y-axis, so
it's meaningless.
--
Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL
On Sep 4, 10:49 am, Sulsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:32:23 -
>
> Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here are the statistics from Google Trends:
>
> >http://benyang22a.blogspot.com/2007/09/perl-vs-python.html
>
> This chart is showing that amount of python programers is
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:32:23 -
Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are the statistics from Google Trends:
>
> http://benyang22a.blogspot.com/2007/09/perl-vs-python.html
>
This chart is showing that amount of python programers is smaller every
year :(
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
Here are the statistics from Google Trends:
http://benyang22a.blogspot.com/2007/09/perl-vs-python.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
14 matches
Mail list logo