On Tuesday, July 23, 2019 at 2:20:45 PM UTC-6, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Jesse Ibarra schrieb am 22.07.19 um 18:12:
> > On Saturday, July 20, 2019 at 1:11:51 PM UTC-6, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> >> Jesse Ibarra schrieb am 20.07.19 um 04:12:
> >>> Sorry, I am not understanding. Smalltlak VW 8.3 does not su
Jesse Ibarra schrieb am 22.07.19 um 18:12:
> On Saturday, July 20, 2019 at 1:11:51 PM UTC-6, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Jesse Ibarra schrieb am 20.07.19 um 04:12:
>>> Sorry, I am not understanding. Smalltlak VW 8.3 does not support Python.
>>> I can only call Pyhton code through C/Python API.
>>
>> Ok
On Saturday, July 20, 2019 at 1:11:51 PM UTC-6, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Jesse Ibarra schrieb am 20.07.19 um 04:12:
> > Sorry, I am not understanding. Smalltlak VW 8.3 does not support Python.
> > I can only call Pyhton code through C/Python API.
>
> Ok, but that doesn't mean you need to write code
Jesse Ibarra schrieb am 20.07.19 um 04:12:
> Sorry, I am not understanding. Smalltlak VW 8.3 does not support Python.
> I can only call Pyhton code through C/Python API.
Ok, but that doesn't mean you need to write code that uses the C-API of
Python. All you need to do is:
1) Start up a CPython ru
Jesse Ibarra writes:
> ...
> Now ,I need to bring in shared libraries using C/Python API using Smalltalk.
> It seems like I can't directly bring in C shared libraries (.so files).
> PROBLEM.
With Python, you typically do not load ("bring in") shared libraries
explicitly; instead, you simply imp
Sorry, I am not understanding. Smalltlak VW 8.3 does not support Python. I can
only call Pyhton code through C/Python API.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Jesse Ibarra schrieb am 17.07.19 um 20:39:
> My options seem rather limited, I need to make a Pipeline from
> (Smalltalk -> C -> Python) then go back (Smalltalk <- C <- Python).
> Since Smalltalk does not support Python directly I have to settle with
> the C/Python API
> (https://docs.python.org/3.
Am 19.07.19 um 16:26 schrieb Jesse Ibarra:
On Friday, July 19, 2019 at 8:17:43 AM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:16 AM Jesse Ibarra
wrote:
On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 2:01:39 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 5:51 AM Christian Gollwitzer wrot
On Friday, July 19, 2019 at 8:17:43 AM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:16 AM Jesse Ibarra
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 2:01:39 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 5:51 AM Christian Gollwitzer
> > > wrote:
> > > > Once you can
On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-6, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 18.07.19 um 16:18 schrieb Jesse Ibarra:
> > On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 2:20:51 PM UTC-6, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> >> What level of integration do you want to achieve? Do you want
> >>
> >> a) to call Python fu
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 12:16 AM Jesse Ibarra
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 2:01:39 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 5:51 AM Christian Gollwitzer
> > wrote:
> > > Once you can do this, you can proceed to call a Python function, which
> > > in C means that yo
On Thursday, July 18, 2019 at 2:01:39 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 5:51 AM Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> > Once you can do this, you can proceed to call a Python function, which
> > in C means that you invoke the function PyObject_CallObject(). A basic
> > example is s
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 5:51 AM Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Once you can do this, you can proceed to call a Python function, which
> in C means that you invoke the function PyObject_CallObject(). A basic
> example is shown here:
>
> https://docs.python.org/2/extending/embedding.html#pure-embeddi
Am 18.07.19 um 16:18 schrieb Jesse Ibarra:
On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 2:20:51 PM UTC-6, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
What level of integration do you want to achieve? Do you want
a) to call Python functions from Smalltalk
b) call Smalltalk functions from Python
c) pass callbacks around, e.g.
On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 2:20:51 PM UTC-6, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 17.07.19 um 20:39 schrieb Jesse Ibarra:
> > My options seem rather limited, I need to make a Pipeline from (Smalltalk
> > -> C -> Python) then go back (Smalltalk <- C <- Python). Since Smalltalk
> > does not support
> On 17 Jul 2019, at 19:39, Jesse Ibarra wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 11:55:28 AM UTC-6, Barry Scott wrote:
>>> On 17 Jul 2019, at 16:57, wrote:
>>>
>>> I am using Python3.6:
>>>
>>> [jibarra@redsky ~]$ python3.6
>>> Python 3.6.8 (default, Apr 25 2019, 21:02:35)
>>> [GCC 4.8.5
Jesse Ibarra writes:
> ...
> My options seem rather limited, I need to make a Pipeline from (Smalltalk ->
> C -> Python) then go back (Smalltalk <- C <- Python). Since Smalltalk does
> not support Python directly I have to settle with the C/Python API
> (https://docs.python.org/3.6/extending/em
Am 17.07.19 um 20:39 schrieb Jesse Ibarra:
My options seem rather limited, I need to make a Pipeline from (Smalltalk -> C ->
Python) then go back (Smalltalk <- C <- Python). Since Smalltalk does not support
Python directly I have to settle with the C/Python API
(https://docs.python.org/3.6/ext
On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 11:55:28 AM UTC-6, Barry Scott wrote:
> > On 17 Jul 2019, at 16:57, wrote:
> >
> > I am using Python3.6:
> >
> > [jibarra@redsky ~]$ python3.6
> > Python 3.6.8 (default, Apr 25 2019, 21:02:35)
> > [GCC 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36)] on linux
> > Type "help", "
> On 17 Jul 2019, at 16:57, jesse.ibarra.1...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I am using Python3.6:
>
> [jibarra@redsky ~]$ python3.6
> Python 3.6.8 (default, Apr 25 2019, 21:02:35)
> [GCC 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36)] on linux
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information
I am using Python3.6:
[jibarra@redsky ~]$ python3.6
Python 3.6.8 (default, Apr 25 2019, 21:02:35)
[GCC 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
I am
referencing:https://docs.python.org/3.6/extending/embedding.html#beyond
I've been busy porting a Linux code to Windows, and originally decided to go
for the mingw-w64 toolchain set, with gcc-4.8 and win32 threading model.
I'm embedding Python in C++ code, and I need to be able to import specific
modules, like PySide, to eventually embed an IPython qtcons
On 2/5/2013 10:23 AM, Duncan Booth wrote:
Bas wrote:
A) Implement the main program in C. In a loop, get a chunk of data
using direct call of C functions, convert data to python variables and
call an embedded python interpreter that runs one iteration of the
user's algorithm. When the script fi
Bas, 05.02.2013 16:10:
> at work, we are thinking to replace some legacy application, which is a
> home-grown scripting language for monitoring and controlling a large
> experiment. It is able to read live data from sensors, do some simple
> logic and calculations, send commands to other subsystems
On Feb 5, 8:10 pm, Bas wrote:
> Since all the functions I have to interface with (read and write of live
> data, sending
> commands, ...) are implemented in C, the solution will require writing both C
> and python.
Standard embedding/extending is ok when the interface is 'thin' ie the
number of
Bas wrote:
> A) Implement the main program in C. In a loop, get a chunk of data
> using direct call of C functions, convert data to python variables and
> call an embedded python interpreter that runs one iteration of the
> user's algorithm. When the script finishes, you read some variables
> fro
Hi Group,
at work, we are thinking to replace some legacy application, which is a
home-grown scripting language for monitoring and controlling a large
experiment. It is able to read live data from sensors, do some simple logic and
calculations, send commands to other subsystems and finally gene
akineko wrote:
> The more you work on Python, the harder you can go back to C or C++
> world.
>
> I use SWIG, instead. I think SWIG is a good way to mix two worlds.
If you find it hard to go from Python back to C, you should have a look at
Cython.
http://cython.org/
Stefan
--
http://mail.python
Hello Skip,
Thank you for your response.
Your posting reminds me that we, Python community as a whole, owe a
great deal to Python developers.
The problem is ...
The more you work on Python, the harder you can go back to C or C++
world.
I use SWIG, instead. I think SWIG is a good way to mix two w
aki> Although this is not what you are asking but I'm wondering why you
aki> need to read CPython implementation.
A couple reasons come to mind:
* education
* want to make it better (extend it, fix bugs, etc)
* want to see how it relates to the implementation of other langua
Although this is not what you are asking but I'm wondering why you
need to read CPython implementation.
I have been using Python for 7 or 8 years but I've never encountered
any situations where I need to read CPython implementation.
I needed to read library implementations and installer codes, thou
En Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:32:45 -0200, escribió:
BTW, as a person who hasn't really written a stitch of C++ in about 10
years
I personally find the CPython implementation to be one of the most
well-organized large pieces of code I have ever encountered. It's much
easier to read (to me) than any
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:22 AM, wrote:
> I've just downloaded Python's mainstream implementation (CPython),
> which is written in C. Not to my surprise, I feel like I'm looking at
> unstructured spaghetti, and I'm having trouble figuring out how it all
> works together. (Please bear with me; I'
thmpsn> 1. Can anyone explain to me what kind of program structuring
thmpsn>technique (which paradigm, etc) CPython uses? How do modules
thmpsn>interact together? What conventions does it use?
it's quite object-oriented once you understand how things are done. Take a
look, f
thmpsn@gmail.com writes:
> 1. Can anyone explain to me what kind of program structuring technique
> (which paradigm, etc) CPython uses? How do modules interact together?
> What conventions does it use?
There are a bunch of docs about this, you could read them. The program
is written about the
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:22 PM, wrote:
>
>> 2. Have there been any suggestions in the past to rewrite Python's
>> mainstream implementation in C++ (or why wasn't it done this way from
>> the beginning)?
>
> I'm not a CPython dev (I bet on
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:22 PM, wrote:
> 2. Have there been any suggestions in the past to rewrite Python's
> mainstream implementation in C++ (or why wasn't it done this way from
> the beginning)?
I'm not a CPython dev (I bet one will pipe in), but I would speculate
it's because C++ is so muc
I've just downloaded Python's mainstream implementation (CPython),
which is written in C. Not to my surprise, I feel like I'm looking at
unstructured spaghetti, and I'm having trouble figuring out how it all
works together. (Please bear with me; I'm just going through the usual
frustration that any
graph wrote:
Does anyone know why PySys_GetObject wasn't documented until somewhat
recently (http://bugs.python.org/issue1245) if it has been part of the
system module interface since at least Python 1.5.2? Is it not
supposed to be used? What's the difference the above and importing
the sys mod
Per http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2008-September/506206.html
something like this (plus error handling) seems to be the right way to
add to sys.path when embedding python in C:
PyObject *sys_path = PySys_GetObject("path");
PyObject *path = PyString_FromString(&
nely control what you expose to python, so you don't
> wind up exposing the whole C++ API.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Furkan Kuru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:06 PM
> *To:* python-list@p
On Mar 15, 2:10 am, kaush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a simple python script saved to "test.py" as
>
> import os
> import base64
>
> def Testfunction():
> print "Hello World"
> return
>
> Testfunction()
>
> I am trying to invoke this from a C program as follows
>
> int m
Hi All,
I have a simple python script saved to "test.py" as
import os
import base64
def Testfunction():
print "Hello World"
return
Testfunction()
I am trying to invoke this from a C program as follows
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
Py_Initialize();
PyObject* main_
En Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:05:46 -0200, Furkan Kuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> I do not have access to my development machine right now.
> but is it enough adding just a simple line at the top of my main python
> file
> 'sys.path.append("modules.zip")' before importing any other modules?
Alm
e.
I use one giant SWIG module (see init function above)
SWIG allows you to finely control what you expose to python, so you don't wind
up exposing the whole C++ API.
From: Furkan Kuru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, Feb
I do not have access to my development machine right now.
but is it enough adding just a simple line at the top of my main python file
'sys.path.append("modules.zip")' before importing any other modules?
On 2/7/08, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> En Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:18:57 -0200
En Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:18:57 -0200, Joshua Kugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Furkan Kuru wrote:
>>
>> I have been developing an application in C++ that embeds Python
>> interpreter. It takes advantage of too many modules from Python.
>> When I want to package this application, I need to add
Furkan Kuru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been developing an application in C++ that embeds Python
> interpreter. It takes advantage of too many modules from Python.
> When I want to package this application, I need to add too many files
> (.pyc) from Python/lib folder together with Python25.dll.
> I
The Python byte-code files are already pretty dense, so compressing them
further is unlikely to work if you try to put them in a zip.
WMM
On Feb 7, 2008 11:39 AM, Furkan Kuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been developing an application in C++ that embeds Python
> interpreter.
>
Hello,
I have been developing an application in C++ that embeds Python interpreter.
It takes advantage of too many modules from Python.
When I want to package this application, I need to add too many files (.pyc)
from Python/lib folder together with Python25.dll.
Is there a way to pack these .pyc
sturlamolden wrote:
> The answer is YES. C# can access C functions exported by any DLL with
> platform invoke. Since the Python C API is plain C and not C++ you can
> gain access to it from C#. Import System.Runtime.InteropServices and
> write wrappers like
>
> [DllImport("Python25.dll"), CallingC
On 7 Des, 08:07, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does it mean, I can embed Python in C# as well with the same APIs?
>
> No; you can use the Python API in a native C++ application (the Python
> code is plain C, but all the include files have the
grbgooglefan wrote:
> I want to use Python's Windows (python25.dll) version to embed in my
> C# (or atleast VC++) program for performing syntax checks on the
> Python expressions which are later supposed to be evaluated at runtime
> by another C++ program
>
> For this, I would like to use CPython
ng
> > >> the include, lib & the
> > >> > python25.dll files availale after installing this MSI?
>
> > >> Yes. You don't require the source package to embed Python and use the
> > >> API in your programs.
>
> > > Does it
on the
> >> > Python expressions which are later supposed to be evaluated at runtime
> >> > by another C++ program [...]> Can I start doing the development using
> >> the include, lib & the
> >> > python25.dll files availale after installing thi
I start doing the development using
>> the include, lib & the
>> > python25.dll files availale after installing this MSI?
>>
>> Yes. You don't require the source package to embed Python and use the
>> API in your programs.
>
> Does it mean, I can e
; > python25.dll files availale after installing this MSI?
>
> Yes. You don't require the source package to embed Python and use the API
> in your programs.
>
> --
> Gabriel Genellina
Does it mean, I can embed Python in C# as well with the same APIs?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
En Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:27:15 -0300, grbgooglefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> I want to use Python's Windows (python25.dll) version to embed in my
> C# (or atleast VC++) program for performing syntax checks on the
> Python expressions which are later supposed to be evaluated at runtime
> by a
I want to use Python's Windows (python25.dll) version to embed in my
C# (or atleast VC++) program for performing syntax checks on the
Python expressions which are later supposed to be evaluated at runtime
by another C++ program
For this, I would like to use CPython API functions such as
Py_Initial
On Dec 4, 12:36 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:54:57 -0300, Borse, Ganesh
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > When we compile a Python code using functions such as Py_CompileString
> > or any other similar compile function, what will be the resulti
En Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:54:57 -0300, Borse, Ganesh
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> When we compile a Python code using functions such as Py_CompileString
> or any other similar compile function, what will be the resulting
> executable code?
> Will it be byte code somewhat like the byte code o
When we compile a Python code using functions such as Py_CompileString or any
other similar compile function, what will be the resulting executable code?
Will it be byte code somewhat like the byte code of Java?
Or it will be the same binary code like the once generated by C/C++ compilers
from th
On Aug 23, 1:17 pm, TheShadow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 23, 11:57 am, Farshid Lashkari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > TheShadow wrote:
> > > When extending python in c/c++ after you register a module is there a
> > > way in c/c++
On Aug 23, 11:57 am, Farshid Lashkari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TheShadow wrote:
> > When extending python in c/c++ after you register a module is there a
> > way in c/c++ to check if they were correctly registered?
>
> > Cause I'm having the problem
On Aug 23, 11:57 am, Farshid Lashkari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TheShadow wrote:
> > When extending python in c/c++ after you register a module is there a
> > way in c/c++ to check if they were correctly registered?
>
> > Cause I'm having the problem
TheShadow wrote:
> When extending python in c/c++ after you register a module is there a
> way in c/c++ to check if they were correctly registered?
>
> Cause I'm having the problem where when I execute the the python
> script it finds the module but none of the functions.
When extending python in c/c++ after you register a module is there a
way in c/c++ to check if they were correctly registered?
Cause I'm having the problem where when I execute the the python
script it finds the module but none of the functions.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
On 6 Jun., 05:44, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Python lists and tuples are "generic" containers: both can contain any
> kind of object, and each item may be of a different type: (1, 2.0, 3+0j,
> "four", u"Fünf", file("six")) is a tuple containing 6 items, all of
> differe
En Tue, 05 Jun 2007 03:41:19 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On 5 Jun., 01:32, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yes, it appears that you are building a plain list but your code is
>> expecting another kind of object. I'm unfamiliar with Numeric arrays, if
>> that is what y
This seems like a pretty good resource, although I didn't read it all yet:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/edu/l-dw-linux-pythonscript-i.html
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
now then... where's the edit button...?
oh well, double-posting. Problem solved, thanks for pointing out that
I am needing a numeric array built instead of building a normal list/
tuple. For those who are curious, steps to solving:
...
#include "libnumarray.h" /*from numpy*/
...
...
...
void Cal
On 5 Jun., 01:32, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:58:38 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Onwards to the problem, I have been having difficulty embedding a
> > python module into my C/C++ program. (just a test program before
> > moving on int
En Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:58:38 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Onwards to the problem, I have been having difficulty embedding a
> python module into my C/C++ program. (just a test program before
> moving on into the real thing). I have been making test runs using the
> codes from http://docs
Hello,
first of all, I am a programming newbie, especially in python...
Onwards to the problem, I have been having difficulty embedding a
python module into my C/C++ program. (just a test program before
moving on into the real thing). I have been making test runs using the
codes from http://docs.
On May 19, 6:14 pm, Arjun Narayanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> For thr program,
> #include "E:\Python25\include\Python.h"
Consider using
#include "E:/Python25/include/Python.h"
or
#include "E:\\Python25\\include\\Python.h"
instead.
Or use
#include
and compile with
-IE:/Python25/include
Arjun Narayanan wrote:
> That AND I didn't use the american spelling Py_Initiali >>> Z <<< e();
Like many words ending in -ize/-ise, initialize is listed with what you
call the "American" spelling in the Oxford English Dictionary.
--
Michael Hoffman
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
On May 20, 1:28 am, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Sat, 19 May 2007 13:14:40 -0300, Arjun Narayanan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > For thr program,
> > #include "E:\Python25\include\Python.h"
> > #include
>
> Configure your environment so using:
>
> #include
>
> works (
En Sat, 19 May 2007 13:14:40 -0300, Arjun Narayanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> For thr program,
> #include "E:\Python25\include\Python.h"
> #include
Configure your environment so using:
#include
works (you may need to add E:\Python25\include to some list of searched
directories, maybe
For thr program,
#include "E:\Python25\include\Python.h"
#include
int main(int argc, char* argv[]){
Py_Initialise();
Py_Finalise();
return 0;
}
I get the errors,
main.cpp:7: `Py_Initialise' undeclared (first use this function)
main.cpp:7: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only on
We are still struggling with this but having spent many hours looking
at related code on the net, i have noticed the following sequence quite
a lot
globals = PyDict_New();
PyDict_SetItemString(globals, "__builtins__", PyEval_GetBuiltins());
Can anyone explain what this does exactly? I know what "
Not a Python newb but a bit out of my depth here...
We are trying to use the Python interpreter from within a C/C++
aplication to execute Python code which is in an external file. The
idea is to share a dictionary between the C app and the python script.
After Py_Initialize()
we do something like
Thanks for your reply.
yes, I pass a list as an argument to the function in C.
The list has a random length.
Do you mean to do it in this way?
use PyTuple_Size(args), in a loop
use PyTuple_GetItem(args, i)
or
use PyArg_VaParse?
Best Regards
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
lialie> The list has a random length.
lialie> Do you mean to do it in this way?
lialie> use PyTuple_Size(args), in a loop
lialie> use PyTuple_GetItem(args, i)
lialie> or
lialie> use PyArg_VaParse?
Sketch (that means off-the-top-of-my-head, untested, 99.9% guaranteed
inco
Lialie> I am writing a C extension with .Net. Now I have a list of
Lialie> points, like [(0.0, 0.0), (2.0, 3.0), (random x, random y)].
Lialie> Is there a better way to translate it to an array than doing it
Lialie> one by one?
Are you passing a list as an argument to one of
Hi, all
I am writing a C extension with .Net.
Now I have a list of points, like [(0.0, 0.0), (2.0, 3.0), (random x,
random y)].
Is there a better way to translate it to an array than doing it one by one?
Thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dear Pythoners,
I am trying to embed a Python script into a C++ application for the
first time.
Although I have used the example 5.3 Pure Embedding I am having
problems with calling the function defined in my program.
If I define function multiply in module "multiply.py"
def multiply(a,b):
Hi David,
Thanks for your answer, but I don't think the problem comes from which
Python version I use. I installed the Python from cygwin, but this
didn't change everything.
Finally, I fullfill the PYTHONPATH environment variable to make the
system finding the wx module. It is now able to find it
It sounds like your C program and Python script are running under
different interpreters. Your C program almost certainly is using a
Python version that comes with Cygwin, while the script is probably
using a native win32 Python that has wxPython installed.
Assuming this is true, then compiling yo
Hi all,
I made a small dialog in WxPython. I can run the python script with a
double-click or through command line, and everything goes fine (dialog
appears, which means that wx module has been found).
Then, I decided to write a C program (under Windows, with Cygwin) that
will read my script (thro
I see a couple of problems. First, because I'm using Unix, where filenames are
case-sensitive, I had to '#include "Python.h"' instead of '#include
"python.h"'.
Next, it looks like the behavior that '.' is placed on sys.path isn't done
automatically when embedding. So I had to set the environment
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Program crashes at line Py_Finalize(). Program tries to read some
>memory location and suffer run time exception.
PyTuple_SetItem "steals" a reference, so changing
Py_XDECREF(stringarg);
Py_XDECREF(args);
to just
Py_XDECREF(args);
might fix the problem.
well I manage to figure it out myself. I'm using Bloodshed Dev-cpp
Here's the code:
#include "python.h"
#include
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
double answer = 0;
PyObject *modname, *mod, *mdict, *func, *stringarg, *args, *rslt;
Py_Initialize();
modname = PyStri
I've tried embedding Python in a C app so that Threading is done in the
Python side.
In the simple example below, unless I uncomment the ALLOW_THREADS macros,
the Python thread does nothing until the C for-loop finishes.
My real-world example is a large C/Motif application - apart from scatterin
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:29:43 +0800
Simon Newton wrote:
> The C program is being built like so:
>
> gcc main.c -c -I-I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/python2.4
> -I/usr/include/python2.4 -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> gcc main.o -L/usr/lib -lpthread -ldl -lutil
> -lm /us
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 09:52 +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> Simon Newton wrote:
> > gcc main.c -c -I-I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/python2.4
> > -I/usr/include/python2.4 -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> > gcc main.o -L/usr/lib -lpthread -ldl -lutil
> > -lm /usr/lib/pyt
Simon Newton wrote:
> gcc main.c -c -I-I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/python2.4
> -I/usr/include/python2.4 -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> gcc main.o -L/usr/lib -lpthread -ldl -lutil
> -lm /usr/lib/python2.4/config/libpython2.4.a -o main
>
> I've tried the above on two
Hi,
I've just starting out embedding Python in C and get the following error
when I try and import a module that in turn imports the math module.
ImportError: /usr/lib/python2.4/lib-dynload/math.so: undefined symbol:
PyExc_FloatingPointError
The module is as follows:
# begin script.py
i
Thanks, I cannot get the demo to compile, but I joined their list.
Thanks
Philippe
Chris Lambacher wrote:
> pyrex can be used for embedding too.
> http://www.freenet.org.nz/python/embeddingpyrex/
>
> On 6/28/05, Philippe C. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually maybe not ... looking
pyrex can be used for embedding too.
http://www.freenet.org.nz/python/embeddingpyrex/
On 6/28/05, Philippe C. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually maybe not ... looking at the doc:
>
> I have modules already coded in Python, and I need a C wrapper so C
> applications may link with it.
>
Sorry, it is still not clear when I reread it:
1) I have a bunch of Python working modules
2) I need to compile "something" so external C applications can access 1)
Thanks,
Philippe
Philippe C. Martin wrote:
> Just to make sure i'm clear as I've been told about swig and pyrex: I
> don't want
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
