On 7/18/2009 11:41 AM, Peter Chant wrote:
Max Erickson wrote:
More recent months contain updates to the status of 1.1.7, it is
headed towards a release. Preliminary tarballs and binaries are
available on effbot.org:
http://effbot.org/downloads/#imaging
http://effbot.org/downloads/#pil
Excell
Max Erickson wrote:
> More recent months contain updates to the status of 1.1.7, it is
> headed towards a release. Preliminary tarballs and binaries are
> available on effbot.org:
>
> http://effbot.org/downloads/#imaging
> http://effbot.org/downloads/#pil
Excellent. From a very brief look it se
Peter Chant wrote:
> No, it does not. However, if PIL was updated last in 2006.
> Python in 2009 has gone to version 3.1. If PIL is compatible
> with 3.1 then I'm fine. But I don't want to have to stick with
> Python 2.5 as the rest of the world moves on.
>
> Pete
>
>
Various messages to
Peter Chant wrote:
what do people generally use now?
I can only speak for myself... I use PIL ;-)
Greetings,
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Peter Chant wrote:
>
> No, it does not. However, if PIL was updated last in 2006. Python in
> 2009
> has gone to version 3.1. If PIL is compatible with 3.1 then I'm fine.
> But I don't want to have to stick with Python 2.5 as the rest of the world
> moves on.
BTW, this was not a critisism o
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Peter Chant <
rempete...@cappetezilla.italsco.uk> wrote:
> Michiel Overtoom wrote:
>
> > Peter Chant wrote:
> >
> >> what's the most appropriate (maintained) graphics library to use? PIL
> >> seems to have last been updated in 2006
> >> http://www.pythonware.com/p
Michiel Overtoom wrote:
> Peter Chant wrote:
>
>> what's the most appropriate (maintained) graphics library to use? PIL
>> seems to have last been updated in 2006
>> http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
>> and GD seems to be even older. Don't want to go down a dead end.
>
> Contrary to orga
Peter Chant wrote:
what's the most appropriate (maintained) graphics library to use? PIL seems
to have last been updated in 2006 http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
and GD seems to be even older. Don't want to go down a dead end.
Contrary to organic material, software doesn't rot when it
Chaps,
what's the most appropriate (maintained) graphics library to use? PIL seems
to have last been updated in 2006 http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
and GD seems to be even older. Don't want to go down a dead end.
Pete
--
http://www.petezilla.co.uk
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/l
