Michiel Overtoom wrote: > Peter Chant wrote: > >> what's the most appropriate (maintained) graphics library to use? PIL >> seems to have last been updated in 2006 >> http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/ >> and GD seems to be even older. Don't want to go down a dead end. > > Contrary to organic material, software doesn't rot when it gets older. > > PIL is pretty complete for the task it was designed to do, pretty > debugged during the past years, and pretty much 'finished' -- it doesn't > need frequent updates anymore. > > Greetings, >
No, it does not. However, if PIL was updated last in 2006. Python in 2009 has gone to version 3.1. If PIL is compatible with 3.1 then I'm fine. But I don't want to have to stick with Python 2.5 as the rest of the world moves on. Pete -- http://www.petezilla.co.uk -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
