On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:42 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to perform a tp on semaphores and shared segments of memory, but I
> have a bit of trouble with the first notion.
A tp? Sorry, not something I'm familiar with.
> We are asked here to use only the IPC system 5 objects that are the shar
Hello,
I need to perform a tp on semaphores and shared segments of memory, but I have
a bit of trouble with the first notion.
In short, we are asked to create 3 programs:
The first director, who with the create capacity file argument, will create the
museum with the different IPC system object
In article ,
Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
>On 02/28/10 11:05, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Steven D'Aprano, 28.02.2010 09:48:
>>> There ought to be some kind of competition for the least efficient
>>> solution to programming problems
>>
>> That wouldn't be very interesting. You could just write a code gene
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:05:12 +0100, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano, 28.02.2010 09:48:
>> There ought to be some kind of competition for the least efficient
>> solution to programming problems
>
> That wouldn't be very interesting. You could just write a code generator
> that spits out ton
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:27:04 -0600, John Bokma wrote:
>
>> When do people learn that a
>> language is just a tool to do a job?
>
> When do people learn that there are different sorts of tools? A
> professional wouldn't use a screwdriver when they need a hammer.
[...]
On 02/28/10 11:05, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Steven D'Aprano, 28.02.2010 09:48:
There ought to be some kind of competition for the least efficient
solution to programming problems
That wouldn't be very interesting. You could just write a code generator
that spits out tons of garbage code including
Steven D'Aprano, 28.02.2010 09:48:
> There ought to be some kind of competition for the least efficient
> solution to programming problems
That wouldn't be very interesting. You could just write a code generator
that spits out tons of garbage code including a line that solves the
problem, and the
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:37:50 -0800, staticd wrote:
>> >Amusing how long those Python toes can be. In several replies I have
>> >noticed (often clueless) opinions on Perl. When do people learn that a
>> >language is just a tool to do a job?
>>
>> When do people learn that language makes a differenc
> >Amusing how long those Python toes can be. In several replies I have
> >noticed (often clueless) opinions on Perl. When do people learn that a
> >language is just a tool to do a job?
>
> When do people learn that language makes a difference? I used to be a
> Perl programmer; these days, you'd h
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:27:04 -0600, John Bokma wrote:
> When do people learn that a
> language is just a tool to do a job?
When do people learn that there are different sorts of tools? A
professional wouldn't use a screwdriver when they need a hammer.
Perl has strengths: it can be *extremely* c
In article <87mxyuzj13@castleamber.com>,
John Bokma wrote:
>
>Amusing how long those Python toes can be. In several replies I have
>noticed (often clueless) opinions on Perl. When do people learn that a
>language is just a tool to do a job?
When do people learn that language makes a differen
On Feb 27, 2010, at 1:15 PM, John Bokma wrote:
>> I sure don't want to maintain Perl applications though; even ones I've
>> written.
>
> Ouch, I am afraid that that tells a lot about your Perl programming
> skills.
Nah, it tells you about my preferences.
I can, and have, written maintainable
"sstein...@gmail.com" writes:
> I'm not sure how "use it for what it's good for" has anything to do
> with toes.
I've the feeling that some people who use Python are easily offended by
everthing Perl related. Which is silly; zealotism in general is, for
that matter.
> I've written lots of both
On 2010-02-27, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
>
> On 27 Feb 2010, at 12:44, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:36:41 +0100, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
>>
>>> cat file.dos | python -c "import sys,re;
>>> [sys.stdout.write(re.compile('\r\n').sub('\n', line)) for line in
>>> sys.stdin]" >file.unix
>>
>
On Feb 27, 2010, at 12:27 PM, John Bokma wrote:
> "sstein...@gmail.com" writes:
>
>> On Feb 27, 2010, at 10:01 AM, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
>>> Nothing to do with Perl, Perl only takes a handful of characters to
>>> do this and certainly does not require the creation an intermediate
>>> file
>>
>>
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:01:53 +0100, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
> On 27 Feb 2010, at 12:44, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:36:41 +0100, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
>>
>>> cat file.dos | python -c "import sys,re;
>>> [sys.stdout.write(re.compile('\r\n').sub('\n', line)) for line in
>>> sys.std
* @ Rocteur CC:
On 27 Feb 2010, at 12:44, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:36:41 +0100, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
cat file.dos | python -c "import sys,re;
[sys.stdout.write(re.compile('\r\n').sub('\n', line)) for line in
sys.stdin]" >file.unix
Holy cow!!! Calling a regex just fo
"sstein...@gmail.com" writes:
> On Feb 27, 2010, at 10:01 AM, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
>> Nothing to do with Perl, Perl only takes a handful of characters to
>> do this and certainly does not require the creation an intermediate
>> file
>
> Perl may be better for you for throw-away code. Use Python f
On 2010-02-27, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
> Nothing to do with Perl, Perl only takes a handful of characters to do
> this and certainly does not require the creation an intermediate file,
Are you sure about that?
Or does it just hide the intermediate file from you the way
that sed -i does?
--
Gran
@ Rocteur CC, 27.02.2010 10:36:
> cat file.dos | python -c "import
> sys,re;[sys.stdout.write(re.compile('\r\n').sub('\n', line)) for line in
> sys.stdin]" >file.unix
See:
http://partmaps.org/era/unix/award.html
Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Feb 27, 2010, at 10:01 AM, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
> Nothing to do with Perl, Perl only takes a handful of characters to do this
> and certainly does not require the creation an intermediate file
Perl may be better for you for throw-away code. Use Python for the code you
want to keep (and read
On 27 Feb 2010, at 12:44, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:36:41 +0100, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
cat file.dos | python -c "import sys,re;
[sys.stdout.write(re.compile('\r\n').sub('\n', line)) for line in
sys.stdin]" >file.unix
Holy cow!!! Calling a regex just for a straight lite
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:36:41 +0100, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
> cat file.dos | python -c "import sys,re;
> [sys.stdout.write(re.compile('\r\n').sub('\n', line)) for line in
> sys.stdin]" >file.unix
Holy cow!!! Calling a regex just for a straight literal-to-literal
string replacement! You've been i
@ Rocteur CC wrote:
> But then I found
> http://wiki.python.org/moin/Powerful%20Python%20One-Liners
> and tried this:
>
> cat file.dos | python -c "import sys,re;
> [sys.stdout.write(re.compile('\r\n').sub('\n', line)) for line in
> sys.stdin]" >file.unix
>
> And it works..
- Don't build list
On 02/27/10 09:36, @ Rocteur CC wrote:
Hi a couple of fragmented things popped in my head reading your
question, non of them is very constructive though in what you actually
want, but here it goes anyway.
- Oneline through away script with re as a built in syntax, yup that
sounds like perl t
, I'm learning Python, I have to
think in Python, as I'm a Python newbie I fired up Google and typed:
+python convert dos to unix +one +liner
Found perl, sed, awk but no python on the first page
So I tried
+python dos2unix +one +liner -perl
Same thing..
But then I found http://wiki.
26 matches
Mail list logo
