On 11/10/2016 18:14, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:19 am, BartC wrote:
Python is not really suited for AOT native-code compilation.
You might be right, but the author of Nuitka disagrees.
http://nuitka.net/
I tried the same thing with a dynamic language: translating byte-cod
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 12:19 am, BartC wrote:
> Python is not really suited for AOT native-code compilation.
You might be right, but the author of Nuitka disagrees.
http://nuitka.net/
Nice to see that there's a new release, only a week or so ago!
--
Steve
“Cheer up,” they said, “things could
Grant Edwards wrote:
> > For my part, i differenciate a strict compilation (ie. C) from a
> > translation into byte-code (ie. Python).
>
> FWIW I've seen C compilers that produced byte-code. They allowed for
> a highly interactive developemnt environment.
I do not want to fight every word and
On 2016-10-11, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
> For my part, i differenciate a strict compilation (ie. C) from a
> translation into byte-code (ie. Python).
FWIW I've seen C compilers that produced byte-code. They allowed for
a highly interactive developemnt environment.
--
Grant Edwards
On 11/10/2016 13:35, Pierre-Alain Dorange wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
The "small translation into byte-code" *is* compilation.
Don't make the mistake that the only product of "compile" is some CPU
code; that is a foolishly narrow definition.
OK right.
For my part, i differenciate a strict comp
Ben Finney wrote:
> The "small translation into byte-code" *is* compilation.
>
> Don't make the mistake that the only product of "compile" is some CPU
> code; that is a foolishly narrow definition.
OK right.
For my part, i differenciate a strict compilation (ie. C) from a
translation into byte-
pdora...@pas-de-pub-merci.mac.com (Pierre-Alain Dorange) writes:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#compile
> >
> > [Python code is] compiled.
>
> Using this function, the code is "compiled".
You have it backward: Python code is compiled. That's what
