On Oct 22, 5:14 pm, Philip Semanchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Philip Semanchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > wrote:
> >>> One oversight I noticed the multiprocessing module docs is that a
> >> semaphore's acqui
On Oct 22, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Philip Semanchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
One oversight I noticed the multiprocessing module docs is that a
semaphore's acquire() method shouldn't have a timeout on OS X as
sem_timedwait() isn't supported o
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Philip Semanchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The BSD issue was raised late in the cycle for 2.6. The problem is
>> that FBSD's support is "very experimental" as Phillip points out - and
>> OpenBSD doesn't even have them.
>>
>> Due to the lateness of the issue and
On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:45 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that the multiprocessing module in 2.6 is broken for *BSD;
I've seen issue 3770 regarding this. I'm curious if there are more
details on this issue since the posts in 3770 we
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:31 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 8:11 am, "Jesse Noller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:45 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > It seems that the multiprocessing module in 2.6 is broken for *BSD;
>> > I've seen issue 3770 regarding
On Oct 22, 8:11 am, "Jesse Noller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:45 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems that the multiprocessing module in 2.6 is broken for *BSD;
> > I've seen issue 3770 regarding this. I'm curious if there are more
> > details on this issue since
On Oct 21, 8:08 pm, Philip Semanchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2008, at 6:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > It seems that the multiprocessing module in 2.6 is broken for *BSD;
> > I've seen issue 3770 regarding this. I'm curious if there are more
> > details on this issue since th
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:45 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that the multiprocessing module in 2.6 is broken for *BSD;
> I've seen issue 3770 regarding this. I'm curious if there are more
> details on this issue since the posts in 3770 were a bit unclear. For
> example, one post claimed
On Oct 21, 2008, at 6:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that the multiprocessing module in 2.6 is broken for *BSD;
I've seen issue 3770 regarding this. I'm curious if there are more
details on this issue since the posts in 3770 were a bit unclear. For
example, one post claimed that the p
It seems that the multiprocessing module in 2.6 is broken for *BSD;
I've seen issue 3770 regarding this. I'm curious if there are more
details on this issue since the posts in 3770 were a bit unclear. For
example, one post claimed that the problem was that sem_open isn't
implemented in *BSD, but it
10 matches
Mail list logo
