On Aug 8, 8:15 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:43:03 -0700, rantingrick wrote:
> > Ruby has what they
> > call a "Here Doc". Besides picking the most boneheaded name for such an
> > object
>
> It's standard terminology that has been around for a long time in many
> different l
On Aug 9, 8:19 am, Mike Kent wrote:
> On Aug 8, 8:43 pm, rantingrick wrote:
> Xah, this is really you, isn't it. Come on, confess.
*MOI*, How could *I* be xah. I really don't like Ruby however he
gushes over it all the time. And he does not like Python that much
either. We are total opposites,
On 8/9/10 4:43 PM, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 2010-08-09 22:23, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2010-08-09 06:42 , Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
Unfortunatey, when I enter
In [2]: %paste
at the prompt it gives me (before I pasted anything)
In [2]: %paste
-
On 9 Aug, 10:21, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> And that it's quite finicky about blank lines between methods and inside
> functions. Makes it hard to paste code directly into the interpreter.
The combination of editor, debugger and interpreter is what I miss
most from Matlab. In Matlab we can have a
On 2010-08-09 23:43, Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
> I got that traceback as soon as I typed in "%paste" and
> pressed enter, without pasting anything in the terminal.
> I had assumed it works like :paste in Vim, activating a
I meant ":set paste" of course.
Stefan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
Hi Robert,
On 2010-08-09 22:23, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2010-08-09 06:42 , Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
>> Unfortunatey, when I enter
>>
>>In [2]: %paste
>>
>> at the prompt it gives me (before I pasted anything)
>>
>>In [2]: %paste
>>
On 2010-08-09 06:42 , Stefan Schwarzer wrote:
Hi Steven,
On 2010-08-09 10:21, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
And that it's quite finicky about blank lines between methods and inside
functions. Makes it hard to paste code directly into the interpreter.
And that pasting doesn't strip out any leading pro
On Aug 8, 8:43 pm, rantingrick wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> You all know i been forced to use Ruby and i am not happy about that.
***Blablabla cut long rant***
Xah, this is really you, isn't it. Come on, confess.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi Steven,
On 2010-08-09 10:21, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> And that it's quite finicky about blank lines between methods and inside
> functions. Makes it hard to paste code directly into the interpreter.
>
> And that pasting doesn't strip out any leading prompts. It needs a good
> doctest mode.
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:29:19 -0700, rantingrick wrote:
> On Aug 8, 8:15 pm, Steven D'Aprano cybersource.com.au> wrote:
>
>> In Ruby they decided to be more general, so you can define whatever
>> heredoc you need to quote whatever literal string you need. That's not
>> bone-headed.
>
> Devils Ad
On Aug 8, 8:15 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> In Ruby they decided to be more general, so you can define whatever
> heredoc you need to quote whatever literal string you need. That's not
> bone-headed.
Devils Advocate!
PS: Man you're irb main was so full of cobweb i could barley see the
code... h
On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:43:03 -0700, rantingrick wrote:
> Ha. Ruby does not really have multi line strings.
Except, of course, it does, as you go on to show.
> Ruby has what they
> call a "Here Doc". Besides picking the most boneheaded name for such an
> object
It's standard terminology that
rantingrick wrote:
Hello folks,
[snip]
-
Strings
-
Single line strings are exactly the same in both languages except in
Ruby double quoted strings are backslash interpreted and single quote
strings are basically raw. Except Ruby introduces more cruft (a
Hello folks,
You all know i been forced to use Ruby and i am not happy about that.
But i thought i would share more compelling evidence of the moronicity
of the Ruby language syntax from the perspective of regexp's.
I recently built myself a nice little Ruby script editor because i
hate everythin
14 matches
Mail list logo
