Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread dcrespo
> Really though, these questions are more suited for the wxPython mailing list. Thank you very much for this acclaration :) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread Jaime Wyant
On 27 Apr 2005 11:31:00 -0700, dcrespo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong: XRCed doesn't allow to do MDI Parent and Child > frames, but simple apps only. > For what you wouldn't use it? And instead, what would you use instead? > GUI Hand coding? > > Daniel > Looking at the docs

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread dcrespo
Ok, I get the point. So, when a dynamic component comes up, It can be handled importing from an XRC file? I have to develop a complete MDI app, so I'm realizing that I will get ride of hand-coding it. Daniel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
I forgot to mention in my previous post that the best thing in wxPython is the wxPython demo. It helped me a lot. Browsing through the examples usually faster than browsing through the api doc. About XRCed: I put every static components of the window layout in an xml file with XRCed (not static co

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread dcrespo
Correct me if I'm wrong: XRCed doesn't allow to do MDI Parent and Child frames, but simple apps only. For what you wouldn't use it? And instead, what would you use instead? GUI Hand coding? Daniel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2005-04-27, dcrespo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you see carefully, that question was for you too, because the reply > is at the same level as the one that says "Aaand: which do you > prefer?" :) You're assuming that everybody's newsreader displays things in the same manner yours does.

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread Shane Hathaway
Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > it's not quite true since the latest stable release (2.6.0.0) > > see the new wx doc (it's generated with epydoc so it's not for C++): > http://www.wxpython.org/docs/api/ > > i used wxPython with XRCed a few times and i liked the way it works > (worked under linux and win a

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
it's not quite true since the latest stable release (2.6.0.0) see the new wx doc (it's generated with epydoc so it's not for C++): http://www.wxpython.org/docs/api/ i used wxPython with XRCed a few times and i liked the way it works (worked under linux and win as well for me) nsz -- http://mai

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread Michael Soulier
On 25 Apr 2005 08:56:23 -0700, dcrespo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all... > > I'm learning both, but at a slow step, so I want to know all the > comments about this subject in this group. Personally, I like pyGTK more because the docs are better. There's nothing I hate more than trying to use

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread dcrespo
If you see carefully, that question was for you too, because the reply is at the same level as the one that says "Aaand: which do you prefer?" :) Daniel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2005-04-27, dcrespo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aaand: which do you prefer? Neither particularly. I'm using wxPython because GTK for windows wasn't ready three years ago when I initially had to write my first Windows application. If I evaluated both of them again today, I might choose G

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2005-04-27, dcrespo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And what did you use for deploying either PyGTK and wxPython? In other > words, what were your workspace and logic of the development? To whom is this question addressed? I suggest you quote properly when replying in order to give your question

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread dcrespo
Aaand: which do you prefer? Daniel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-27 Thread dcrespo
And what did you use for deploying either PyGTK and wxPython? In other words, what were your workspace and logic of the development? Thanks Daniel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-26 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2005-04-26, dcrespo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aparently, none of you has tried wxPython recently or properly. Not so. I'm using it currently and have been using it for a couple years now. > wxPython is a cross-platform toolkit. Currently supported platforms are > 32-bit Microsoft Windows,

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-26 Thread dcrespo
Hi all... Thank you for your answers... wxPython, under Linux, tries to use GTK... A better way to say it is: wxPython uses whatever it needs: under Windows, his API; under Linux, his API (may imply the use of GTK or GNOME), etc... Aparently, none of you has tried wxPython recently or properly. w

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-25 Thread steve.leach
dcrespo wrote: Hi all... I think wxPython is much better than PyGTK. First of all, PyGTK needs the GTK runtime installed, whereas wxPython is entirely Python's And depending on your platform, wxPython also requires GTK installed. wxWindows is a wrapper for different GUI toolkits. On Windows, it us

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-25 Thread Maciej Dziardziel
dcrespo wrote: > Hi all... > > I think wxPython is much better than PyGTK. First of all, PyGTK needs > the GTK runtime installed, whereas wxPython is entirely Python's > modules, so It facilitates the apps' distribution. As already mentioned, it is not true. You will still need GTK (on Linux, no

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-25 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2005-04-25, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Edwards wrote: > >> Huh? wxPythonGTK requires GTK runtimes as well: > > He was probably talking about Windows, where wx toolkit uses native > (more or less...) controls. Ah -- I forgot that GTK was an option under Windows. The last ti

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-25 Thread Ivan Voras
Grant Edwards wrote: Huh? wxPythonGTK requires GTK runtimes as well: He was probably talking about Windows, where wx toolkit uses native (more or less...) controls. But then, installing GTK runtime libraries on Windows is a one-click job, there are automated installers for it. -- http://mail.py

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-25 Thread Neil Benn
Grant Edwards wrote: On 2005-04-25, dcrespo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all... I think wxPython is much better than PyGTK. First of all, PyGTK needs the GTK runtime installed, whereas wxPython is entirely Python's modules, Huh? wxPythonGTK requires GTK runtimes as well: Hello,

Re: PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-25 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2005-04-25, dcrespo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all... > > I think wxPython is much better than PyGTK. First of all, PyGTK needs > the GTK runtime installed, whereas wxPython is entirely Python's > modules, Huh? wxPythonGTK requires GTK runtimes as well: $ ldd libwx_gtk2_core-2.5.so> /tmp

PyGTK vs. wxPython

2005-04-25 Thread dcrespo
Hi all... I think wxPython is much better than PyGTK. First of all, PyGTK needs the GTK runtime installed, whereas wxPython is entirely Python's modules, so It facilitates the apps' distribution. Also, PyGTK uses specific controls or widgets of GTK, while wxPython uses native controls of the platf