Re: PEP 492, new coroutine syntax for Python

2015-04-18 Thread Marko Rauhamaa
Chris Angelico : > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: >> I don't remember anyone mentioning this here yet, and it is mighty cool: >> >> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0492/ > > [...] > > And yes, it IS cool. I think the current proposal has a lot of > duplication (it looks li

Re: PEP 492, new coroutine syntax for Python

2015-04-17 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: > Chris Angelico writes: >> Hah. It only just hit python-ideas, so you're jumping in on something >> brand new - no wonder it hasn't been mentioned yet :) > > Interesting. It's dated a couple weeks ago and has obviously been in > the works for a

Re: PEP 492, new coroutine syntax for Python

2015-04-17 Thread Paul Rubin
Chris Angelico writes: > Hah. It only just hit python-ideas, so you're jumping in on something > brand new - no wonder it hasn't been mentioned yet :) Interesting. It's dated a couple weeks ago and has obviously been in the works for a while. There's a working implementation which I'd think mea

Re: PEP 492, new coroutine syntax for Python

2015-04-17 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: > I don't remember anyone mentioning this here yet, and it is mighty cool: > > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0492/ Hah. It only just hit python-ideas, so you're jumping in on something brand new - no wonder it hasn't been mentioned yet :)

PEP 492, new coroutine syntax for Python

2015-04-17 Thread Paul Rubin
I don't remember anyone mentioning this here yet, and it is mighty cool: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0492/ -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list