Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> writes: > Hah. It only just hit python-ideas, so you're jumping in on something > brand new - no wonder it hasn't been mentioned yet :)
Interesting. It's dated a couple weeks ago and has obviously been in the works for a while. There's a working implementation which I'd think means it's outside the idea phase. > I think the current proposal has a lot of duplication (it looks like > there's almost a complete replica of the generator protocol being > created in parallel), but whatever happens, it's a good thing. But it's so much cleaner than the existing generator stuff and can pretty much replace it. That is the kind of change that Python 3 really should have been about. > I strongly recommend jumping over to python-ideas and following along > - that is, if you're interested enough to drink from the veritable > fire-hose of -ideas! I might take a look at the list archive. I don't think I could deal with actually receiving the mailings and trying to keep up with them. > There's a chance this will land in Python 3.5, but if not, I'd be very > surprised if it doesn't hit 3.6. Neat :). This paper about Lua coroutines is good and if it hasn't been part of the PEP discussion and looks relevant, you might want to post it there: http://www.jucs.org/jucs_10_7/coroutines_in_lua/de_Moura_A_L.pdf -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
