> On 1 Apr 2024, at 18:14, Left Right via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> It sounds weird that symbols from Limited API are _missing_ (I'd
> expect them to be there no matter what library version you link with).
You have to specify the version of the limited API that you want to use.
Each release ad
It sounds weird that symbols from Limited API are _missing_ (I'd
expect them to be there no matter what library version you link with).
But, I haven't done this myself, so, what do I know? It would help
though to see the actual error.
That aside: why do you want to do this? One side effect of doi
> On 29 Mar 2024, at 16:09, Olivier B.
> wrote:
>
> It is not a symlink on my system, where i built python myself, but a
> 15KB so file. But it seems to lack lots of python symbols.
>
> Maybe what i should do is actually make libpython.so a physical copy
> of libpyton311.so before linking to
It is not a symlink on my system, where i built python myself, but a
15KB so file. But it seems to lack lots of python symbols.
Maybe what i should do is actually make libpython.so a physical copy
of libpyton311.so before linking to it, so now on any system the
module would look to load libpython.
> On 28 Mar 2024, at 16:13, Olivier B. via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> But on Linux, it seems that linking to libpython3.so instead of
> libpython3.11.so.1.0 does not have the same effect, and results in
> many unresolved python symbols at link time
>
> Is this functionality only available on W
I have a python module that includes some C++ code that links with the
Python C API
I have now modified the c++ code so that it only uses the Limited API,
and linked with python3.lib instead of python311.lib.
I can now use that python module with different python versions on Windows
But on Linux
les-across-modules-from-user-defined-config-file
I think I could probably get that to work, but are there any better
alternatives?
Cheers,
Loris
--
This signature is currently under constuction.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 6/02/23 4:23 am, Weatherby,Gerard wrote:
Well, first of all, while there is no doubt as to Dijkstra’s contribution to
computer science, I don’t think his description of scientific thought is
correct. The acceptance of Einstein’s theory of relativity has nothing to do
with internal consisten
sure that’s true. If it’s
not, I’d be interested in a counterexample).
From: Python-list on
behalf of transreductionist
Date: Saturday, February 4, 2023 at 7:42 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: Organizing modules and their code
*** Attention: This is an external email. Use caution
ns below)
> containing code, that as the name suggests, manages an ETL pipeline. A
> directory is created called etl_helpers that organizes several modules
> responsible for making up the pipeline. The discussion concerns the Python
> language, which supports OOP as well as Structural/Func
On 5/02/23 11:18 am, transreductionist wrote:
This analogy came to me the other day. For me, I would rather walk into a
grocery store where the bananas, apples, and oranges are separated in to their
own bins, instead of one common crate.
On the other hand, if the store has an entire aisle dev
directory is created called etl_helpers that organizes several modules
> > responsible for making up the pipeline. The discussion concerns the Python
> > language, which supports OOP as well as Structural/Functional approaches to
> > programming.
> >
> > I am int
transreductionist
Date: Friday, February 3, 2023 at 4:48 PM
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Organizing modules and their code
*** Attention: This is an external email. Use caution responding, opening
attachments or clicking on links. ***
Here is the situation. There is a top-level module (see designs
paration of concerns, decoupled
modules and APIs, and so forth. Doing this does not require a full,
future-proof suite of alternative database adapters, for example, right
from the start. On top of everything else, you can't know the future
perfectly. And you can't know enough at the
On 04/02/2023 16.24, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 2/3/2023 5:14 PM, 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com wrote:
Keep It Simple: Put all four modules at the top level, and run with it
until you falsify it. Yes, I would give you that same advice no matter
what language you're using.
In my r
On 2/3/2023 5:14 PM, 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com wrote:
Keep It Simple: Put all four modules at the top level, and run with it
until you falsify it. Yes, I would give you that same advice no matter
what language you're using.
In my recent message I supported DESIGN 1. But I r
On 2/3/2023 4:18 PM, transreductionist wrote:
Here is the situation. There is a top-level module (see designs below)
containing code, that as the name suggests, manages an ETL pipeline. A
directory is created called etl_helpers that organizes several modules
responsible for making up the
On 2023-02-03 at 13:18:46 -0800,
transreductionist wrote:
> Here is the situation. There is a top-level module (see designs below)
> containing code, that as the name suggests, manages an ETL pipeline. A
> directory is created called etl_helpers that organizes several modules
> res
Here is the situation. There is a top-level module (see designs below)
containing code, that as the name suggests, manages an ETL pipeline. A
directory is created called etl_helpers that organizes several modules
responsible for making up the pipeline. The discussion concerns the Python
> On 21 Nov 2022, at 21:23, r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
>
> dn writes:
>> Now, at the config stage, take the instructions to define whichever the
>> user prefers, and instantiate that class. Then the 'calling-routine' can
>> use the instantiated object as an interface to whichever type of
can happen today if, for example, a class is changed to use slots
for everything. Between slots and type checking, it can become
impossible to add an arbitrary attribute. *You* may be able to avoid
this, but if you use someone else's modules or classes it could happen
at any time.
I might
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 16:26, dn wrote:
> Am put-off by the 'smell' of subverting/adapting names like print() =
> surprise/confusion factor - but I think I understand where you're going.
To be fair, redefining the "print" function IS one of the reasons that
it's no longer a statement. Though I wo
On 21/11/2022 01.29, Stefan Ram wrote:
dn writes:
A 'standard' solution is to collect all such configuration-data at the
start of the application, into an object (or other data-structure) - I
usually call it "env" (an instantiation of "Environment").
Yeah, I had some functions of my librar
On 11/21/2022 12:01 AM, dn wrote:
On 21/11/2022 12.07, Dan Kolis wrote:
If you understand its meaning, it achieves my purpose. If you don't I
you're perhaps not a programmer...
Ouch!
Does the first sentence imply who is the more important person in the
interaction? Does the second further th
On 21/11/2022 12.07, Dan Kolis wrote:
If you understand its meaning, it achieves my purpose. If you don't I you're
perhaps not a programmer...
Ouch!
Does the first sentence imply who is the more important person in the
interaction? Does the second further the idea that anyone/everyone who
i
On 11/20/2022 4:07 PM, Roel Schroeven wrote:
Thomas Passin schreef op 20/11/2022 om 20:33:
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20050607-00/?p=35413
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20101125-00/?p=12203
Now that I think about it, The Old New Thing is also where I got the
global
Its advice, I don't think the style issue is particularly important.
If you understand its meaning, it achieves my purpose. If you don't I you're
perhaps not a programmer...
I like the abruptness of technical writing as a style, actually. If that is how
machine learning ( aka 'A.I.' ) tends to
On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 at 09:37, Dan Kolis wrote:
>
> Using sys.stdout / is simply nonsense. The more I think about it, the more I
> realise how bad it is.
>
> Going on about it endlessly seems pointless.
>
> If the even mini threading thing is turned on, now what ? some other module
> eats the mes
'other' modules
4) When a shared idea is apparent concat a new named portion to the name for
this purpose. Then use those fairly without fussing as required. If one scares
you, set it to {} after some scary moment if you are feeling fussy.
5) All 'ideas' will be at a 3rd or
Thomas Passin schreef op 20/11/2022 om 20:33:
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20050607-00/?p=35413
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20101125-00/?p=12203
Now that I think about it, The Old New Thing is also where I got the
global vs local thing: "Don’t use global state to ma
M would use sys.stdin for input and sys.stdout
for output.
I feel this is a bad idea. This uses global state for customizing local
behavior. Yes, maybe you want to customize behavior in one of your
modules, or even only in some functions, or maybe in several or even all
of your modules. But by c
On 21/11/2022 01.03, Stefan Ram wrote:
dn writes:
In some respects we have the (OP) problem because Python does not have
"interfaces" as a formal component of the language.
What one can do today is,
class my_interface( metaclass=abc.ABCMeta ):
"""This interface ..."""
@abc.abst
for output.
I feel this is a bad idea. This uses global state for customizing local
behavior. Yes, maybe you want to customize behavior in one of your
modules, or even only in some functions, or maybe in several or even all
of your modules. But by changing module "M", you're chan
It's certainly not an "incredibly bad idea", it is a mildly bad idea however.
Why be stuck with maybe's and just text strings ?
Functions as "first class operators" and object oriented languages are a
natural pair with a bit of heavy thinking.
The problem is... there is nobody giving you a 3
There is no guarantee that argv is consulted earlier in the program than
other modules will use it for communication.
Consider a case where a program does look at argv but later wants to call
another program using some or all of the components of argv and now there
are added components there
In a module mostly for this purpose; ( big program means many modules aka files
):
--
globalIdeas.py
--
# Empty object maker ( M T
On 18Nov2022 10:53, Stefan Ram wrote:
Can I use "sys.argv" to pass information between modules
as follows? [...]
Stefan, it looks like most of the replies take the form: yes you can do
that but it is probably a bad idea.
Could you outline the larger situation where you want
On 11/19/2022 3:46 PM, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 18/11/2022 04.53, Stefan Ram wrote:
Can I use "sys.argv" to pass information between modules
as follows?
in module A:
import sys
sys.argv.append( "Hi there!" )
in module B:
import sys
message = sys.argv[ -1
On 11/19/2022 4:28 PM, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 11/19/2022 3:46 PM, Michael F. Stemper wrote:
On 18/11/2022 04.53, Stefan Ram wrote:
Can I use "sys.argv" to pass information between modules
as follows?
in module A:
import sys
sys.argv.append( "Hi there!" )
On 18/11/2022 04.53, Stefan Ram wrote:
Can I use "sys.argv" to pass information between modules
as follows?
in module A:
import sys
sys.argv.append( "Hi there!" )
in module B:
import sys
message = sys.argv[ -1 ]
I just tried and it appears that one ca
On 18/11/2022 23.53, Stefan Ram wrote:
Can I use "sys.argv" to pass information between modules
as follows?
in module A:
import sys
sys.argv.append( "Hi there!" )
in module B:
import sys
message = sys.argv[ -1 ]
. "sys.argv" is sai
On 18/11/2022 10:53, Stefan Ram wrote:
Can I use "sys.argv" to pass information between modules
as follows?
in module A:
import sys
sys.argv.append( "Hi there!" )
in module B:
import sys
message = sys.argv[ -1 ]
This idea has a couple of flaws so ca
On 11/18/2022 10:19 AM, Tobiah wrote:
On 11/18/22 02:53, Stefan Ram wrote:
Can I use "sys.argv" to pass information between modules
as follows?
in module A:
import sys
sys.argv.append( "Hi there!" )
in module B:
import sys
message = sys.argv[ -1 ]
Kind
On 11/18/22 02:53, Stefan Ram wrote:
Can I use "sys.argv" to pass information between modules
as follows?
in module A:
import sys
sys.argv.append( "Hi there!" )
in module B:
import sys
message = sys.argv[ -1 ]
Kind of seems like a code smell. I think you
On 2022-06-21 02:04:52 -0700, Chethan Kumar S wrote:
> I have a main process which makes use of different other modules. And
> these modules also use other modules. I need to log all the logs into
> single log file. Due to use of TimedRotatingFileHandler, my log
> behaves diffe
Chethan Kumar S wrote at 2022-6-21 02:04 -0700:
> ...
>I have a main process which makes use of different other modules. And these
>modules also use other modules. I need to log all the logs into single log
>file. Due to use of TimedRotatingFileHandler, my log behaves diffe
The process that is writing the file must be told that rotation has
happened for it to work.
Other wise all the logs keep being write to the original file via the
FD that the process has.
logrotate's config include how to tell the process the log file needs
reopening.
Thanks for clearing.
> On 22 Jun 2022, at 11:06, Lars Liedtke wrote:
>
> Could be unrelated and only a part of a solution, but if you are on a unixoid
> system, you could use logrotate, instead of TimedRotatingFileHandler.
> logfrotate ensures that the logging service does not realize, its logs have
> been rota
privacy policy
http://solute.de/ger/datenschutz/grundsaetze-der-datenverarbeitung.php
Am 21.06.22 um 11:04 schrieb Chethan Kumar S:
I have a main process which makes use of different other modules. And these
modules also use other modules. I need to log all the logs into single log
file. Due to use
Hi all,
Need help with below query on python logging module.
I have a main process which makes use of different other modules. And these
modules also use other modules. I need to log all the logs into single log
file. Due to use of TimedRotatingFileHandler, my log behaves differently after
On 12/23/21 09:38, Shaozhong SHI wrote:
> Can we do something like import an fme.something and make use of FME
> modules and functions?
And what, pray tell, is FME?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Can we do something like import an fme.something and make use of FME
modules and functions?
Regards,
David
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dennis Lee Bieber writes:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 16:28:12 -0300, Hope Rouselle
> declaimed the following:
>
>
>>That's wild. :-) Was this created by Brian Kernighan? It's hard to
>>believe. Oh, I think he wrote AMPL, wasn't it? A Mathematical
>>Programming Language, or something like that.
>
>
bot.x, the package
was installed but on a fresh release, it does not know what exactly is
honeybot
for the first time
Q: In my case in modules what should i write to import from /api?
Kind Regards,
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
about <https://compileralchemy.github.io/> | blog
<https://ww
"Peter J. Holzer" writes:
> On 2021-08-22 16:28:12 -0300, Hope Rouselle wrote:
>> I have a certain distaste for syntax too. For instance, I would much
>> rather write and read ``first(ls)'' than ``ls[0]''.
>
> Would you also prefer `twothousandthreehundredandtwentythird(ls)` over
> `ls[2322]`?
On 2021-08-22 16:28:12 -0300, Hope Rouselle wrote:
> I have a certain distaste for syntax too. For instance, I would much
> rather write and read ``first(ls)'' than ``ls[0]''.
Would you also prefer `twothousandthreehundredandtwentythird(ls)` over
`ls[2322]`?
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holz
On Sun, 22 Aug 2021 16:28:12 -0300, Hope Rouselle
declaimed the following:
>That's wild. :-) Was this created by Brian Kernighan? It's hard to
>believe. Oh, I think he wrote AMPL, wasn't it? A Mathematical
>Programming Language, or something like that.
Kenneth Iverson, early 1960s fo
Dennis Lee Bieber writes:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2021 17:15:14 -0300, Hope Rouselle
> declaimed the following:
>
>>write some PHP precisely because it looked so much more cryptic than
>>Allaire ColdFusion. Then C looked even more cryptic, so I fell in love
>>with C.
>>
> Try APL then...
Lol.
On 2021-08-22 17:18, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Sat, 21 Aug 2021 17:15:14 -0300, Hope Rouselle
declaimed the following:
write some PHP precisely because it looked so much more cryptic than
Allaire ColdFusion. Then C looked even more cryptic, so I fell in love
with C.
Try APL then..
On Sat, 21 Aug 2021 17:15:14 -0300, Hope Rouselle
declaimed the following:
>write some PHP precisely because it looked so much more cryptic than
>Allaire ColdFusion. Then C looked even more cryptic, so I fell in love
>with C.
>
Try APL then...
(I suspect this will get garbaged in proces
;> sys.modules and don't have to worry about somehow unloading the
>>> module.
>>
>> I would agree with this. If you need to mess around with modules and
>> you don't want them to be cached, avoid the normal "import" mechanism,
>> and just ex
Chris Angelico writes:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 4:37 AM Hope Rouselle wrote:
>>
>> Greg Ewing writes:
>>
>> > On 21/08/21 1:36 pm, Hope Rouselle wrote:
>> >> I wish I could restrict their syntax too, though, but I fear that's
>> >> not possible. For instance, it would be very useful if I coul
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 4:37 AM Hope Rouselle wrote:
>
> Greg Ewing writes:
>
> > On 21/08/21 1:36 pm, Hope Rouselle wrote:
> >> I wish I could restrict their syntax too, though, but I fear that's
> >> not possible. For instance, it would be very useful if I could
> >> remove loops.
> >
> > Actu
On 21/08/21 1:36 pm, Hope Rouselle wrote:
I wish I could restrict their syntax too, though,
but I fear that's not possible. For instance, it would be very useful
if I could remove loops.
Actually you could, using ast.parse to get an AST and then walk
it looking for things you don't want to all
Greg Ewing writes:
> On 21/08/21 1:36 pm, Hope Rouselle wrote:
>> I wish I could restrict their syntax too, though, but I fear that's
>> not possible. For instance, it would be very useful if I could
>> remove loops.
>
> Actually you could, using ast.parse to get an AST and then walk
> it lookin
Greg Ewing writes:
> On 21/08/21 6:15 am, Hope Rouselle wrote:
> code()
>> 'def p():\n import math\n return math.e\n'
> exec(code())
> p
>>
> p()
>> 2.718281828459045
>
> Note that this pollutes the globals of the module that you're calling
> exec() from. For better isolation y
On 21/08/21 6:15 am, Hope Rouselle wrote:
code()
'def p():\n import math\n return math.e\n'
exec(code())
p
p()
2.718281828459045
Note that this pollutes the globals of the module that you're calling
exec() from. For better isolation you can pass in an explicit globals
dict:
g = {}
exec
somehow unloading the
>> module.
>
> I would agree with this. If you need to mess around with modules and
> you don't want them to be cached, avoid the normal "import" mechanism,
> and just exec yourself a module's worth of code.
This is looks very interesti
Martin Di Paola writes:
> This may not answer your question but it may provide an alternative
> solution.
>
> I had the same challenge that you an year ago so may be my solution will
> work for you too.
>
> Imagine that you have a Markdown file that *documents* the expected
> results.
>
> This
somehow unloading the
>> module.
>
> I would agree with this. If you need to mess around with modules and
> you don't want them to be cached, avoid the normal "import" mechanism,
> and just exec yourself a module's worth of code.
Sounds like a plan. Bu
[...]
reproducible_problem()
student.py, total losses 10
other.py, total losses 10
The the problem:
reproducible_problem()
student.py, total losses 0
other.py, total losses 0
They lose nothing because both modules are now permanently modified.
(*) The code of grading.py
--8<---cut
e with this. If you need to mess around with modules and
you don't want them to be cached, avoid the normal "import" mechanism,
and just exec yourself a module's worth of code.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
> Python 3.5.2 [...] on win32
> [...]
>>>> reproducible_problem()
> student.py, total losses 10
> other.py, total losses 10
>
> The the problem:
>
>>>> reproducible_problem()
> student.py, total losses 0
> other.py, total losses 0
>
>
_problem()
student.py, total losses 0
other.py, total losses 0
They lose nothing because both modules are now permanently modified.
(*) The code of grading.py
--8<---cut here---start->8---
# -*- mode: python; python-indent-offset: 2 -*-
def key_question1(t):
st interested in understanding more about
>> modules.
>
> Okay, I'll assume all the security issues have been taken are of, e.g.
> by running all of this in a virtual machine...
Oh, good idea. :-D
>> Notice how student m0 (who really scored a zero)
>> first gets his grade r
On 16/08/21 1:50 am, Hope Rouselle wrote:
By the way, I'm aware that what I'm doing here is totally unsafe and I
could get my system destroyed. I'm not planning on using this --- thank
you for your concern. I'm just interested in understanding more about
modules.
Okay,
(*) Introduction
By the way, I'm aware that what I'm doing here is totally unsafe and I
could get my system destroyed. I'm not planning on using this --- thank
you for your concern. I'm just interested in understanding more about
modules.
(*) The problem
I got myself into
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 5:11 AM Charles Smith wrote:
>
> First off, thanks for the answer. I don't see the cached module as a problem
> here. If you provide arguments to a module, the goal is "most likely" to
> alter/parameterize the behavior of the first import. Now, I agree that
> behavior be
First off, thanks for the answer. I don't see the cached module as a problem
here. If you provide arguments to a module, the goal is "most likely" to
alter/parameterize the behavior of the first import. Now, I agree that behavior
becomes unpredictable because passing different parameters on subs
y changing
> the design. The second reason is to invert dependencies between two modules.
> It occurred to me when using libraries like FastAPI or Flask that it would be
> nicer to use and leaner if instead of:
> 1. Import FastAPI Router or FastAPI object directly
> 2. Create a Rout
n two modules. It
occurred to me when using libraries like FastAPI or Flask that it would be
nicer to use and leaner if instead of:
1. Import FastAPI Router or FastAPI object directly
2. Create a Router
3. Use the route decorators
We could simply import a module with importlib and provide the r
Cameron Simpson wrote:
>
> Almost everything I use comes either from pip or from my own modules. My
> $PYTHONPATH on the Mac has this:
>
> /Users/cameron/lib/python:/Users/cameron/rc/python
>
> being, respectively, my personal modules and a place for third party
&
On 23Jul2021 11:33, Chris Green wrote:
>This isn't a question about how to set PYTHONPATH so that Python code
>can find imported modules, it's about what is a sensible layout for
>one's home directory - i.e. where to put Python modules.
>
>I'm running Linux
Roland Mueller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> pe 23. heinäk. 2021 klo 21.44 Chris Green (c...@isbd.net) kirjoitti:
>
> > This isn't a question about how to set PYTHONPATH so that Python code
> > can find imported modules, it's about what is a sensible layout for
> &
23 at 22:46 +0300, Roland Mueller via Python-list
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> pe 23. heinäk. 2021 klo 21.44 Chris Green (c...@isbd.net) kirjoitti:
>
> > This isn't a question about how to set PYTHONPATH so that Python
> > code
> > can find imported modules, it's about
Hello,
pe 23. heinäk. 2021 klo 21.44 Chris Green (c...@isbd.net) kirjoitti:
> This isn't a question about how to set PYTHONPATH so that Python code
> can find imported modules, it's about what is a sensible layout for
> one's home directory - i.e. where to put Python
This isn't a question about how to set PYTHONPATH so that Python code
can find imported modules, it's about what is a sensible layout for
one's home directory - i.e. where to put Python modules.
I'm running Linux and have a number of Python modules that are only
used by my own
On 2021-04-26, Stephen Tucker wrote:
> I have old software written in GWBASIC that I use to plot diagrams on the
> screen.
Pygame is probably the closest thing to what you're describing. If you
want to produce professional looking plots from data, then matplotlib
or one of the Gnuplot wrappers (
On 4/26/21 12:38 AM, Stephen Tucker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have old software written in GWBASIC that I use to plot diagrams on the
> screen.
>
> In Windows 10, I have to resort to using the DOSBox emulator to run it.
>
> I would dearly like to re-write it in Python - ideally Python 2.7.
>
> What, i
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:40 PM Stephen Tucker wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have old software written in GWBASIC that I use to plot diagrams on the
> screen.
>
> In Windows 10, I have to resort to using the DOSBox emulator to run it.
>
"The screen" isn't really a viable target in a modern world, so it
de
Hi,
I have old software written in GWBASIC that I use to plot diagrams on the
screen.
In Windows 10, I have to resort to using the DOSBox emulator to run it.
I would dearly like to re-write it in Python - ideally Python 2.7.
What, if anything, is available?
Stephen Tucker.
--
https://mail.pyt
On 24/02/2021 14:13, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> I need to do some development on this legacy system. It only runs
> python2.6 and there is little hope of installing an other version. How
> can I best proceed to install modules for working with mysql and ldap?
>
The answer very much de
You also could try getting the modules (of suitable versions) you need from
their homepage, possibly github, and then use the setup.py to install your
packages. pypi usually has a link to a project's homepage.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 6:08 AM Dan Stromberg wrote:
>
> I don't th
I don't think pip supports 2.x anymore.
You might be able to:
1) Look up what versions of your desired modules support Python 2.x on
pypi's website
2) Install them on another system that has Python 3.x using pip
3) Copy them to the moribund system
4) Test
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:15
I need to do some development on this legacy system. It only runs
python2.6 and there is little hope of installing an other version. How
can I best proceed to install modules for working with mysql and ldap?
--
Antoon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ok this was due to an install of miniconda then choosing to unconditionally
install an older version of cryptography.
> On Feb 10, 2021, at 3:40 PM, Robert Nicholson
> wrote:
>
> Just reinstalling cryptography with pip install seems to have fixed my issue.
>
> Any pointers on why?
>
>> On Fe
Just reinstalling cryptography with pip install seems to have fixed my issue.
Any pointers on why?
> On Feb 10, 2021, at 3:21 PM, Robert Nicholson
> wrote:
>
> I’m using Python 3.7.0
>
> so I have multiple environments all on the same architecture with the same
> python release using anoncon
I’m using Python 3.7.0
so I have multiple environments all on the same architecture with the same
python release using anonconda.
What I discovered was that if I install the cryptography module in my dev / uat
and then tried to synchronize to production server using rsync I ended up with
error
Yes you are right. I changed the files:
# main.py
import argparse
import mymodule
import logging
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def log_some_messages():
logger.debug(f'{__name__} - debug message')
logger.info(f'{__name__} - info message')
logger.warning(f'{__name__} - warning m
_some_messages(11) - mymodule - info message
2021-01-25 13:22:12,761 - [WARNING] - mymodule -
(mymodule.py).log_some_messages(12) - mymodule - warning message
As you can see, in main.py log level is set correctly, but in mymodule.py it is
not.
How to accept argparse.log_level parameter in i
1 - 100 of 2684 matches
Mail list logo
