Fuzzyman wrote:
> On May 4, 11:28 pm, Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Despite the permissive licences - it'd be hard to slap a
> > bad EULA on IronPython now - the whole thing demonstrates Microsoft's
> > disdain for open standards as usual,
>
> How do you work that out? It seems like a
On May 4, 11:28 pm, Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis M. González wrote:
>
> > Indeed, the subject is absolutely on-topic.
> > If can't talk about a so called "Dynamic Languages Runtime" in a
> > pyhton mailing list, I wonder what it takes to be considered on-topic.
> > Frankly, this on
Luis M. González wrote:
>
> Indeed, the subject is absolutely on-topic.
> If can't talk about a so called "Dynamic Languages Runtime" in a
> pyhton mailing list, I wonder what it takes to be considered on-topic.
> Frankly, this on-topic/off-topic fascism I see in this list is pissing
> me off a lit
On May 4, 6:12 pm, Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 4, 5:27 pm, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 5:19 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On May 3, 2:15 am, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Kindly refrain from creating any more o
On May 4, 10:39 pm, Steven Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fuzzyman wrote:
[snip ...]
>
> >> You are childishly beckoning Usenet etiquette to be gone so that you
> >> may do whatever you wish. But I trust that you will not, out of spite
> >> for being rebuked, turn a few small mistakes into a per
Fuzzyman wrote:
> On May 4, 5:27 pm, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On May 2, 5:19 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On May 3, 2:15 am, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threa
On May 4, 5:27 pm, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 5:19 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On May 3, 2:15 am, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threads.
> > > Thanks.
>
> > The only off-topi
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 2, 5:19 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On May 3, 2:15 am, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threads.
> > > Thanks.
> >
> >
On May 2, 5:19 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 3, 2:15 am, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threads.
> > Thanks.
>
> The only off-topic posting in this thread is your own (and now this
> one).
You are ma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) wrote:
> Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> means in pure Python code the string has python methods, but in
>> Python using the CLR it gains the CLR methods. Presumably in Ruby
>> code it looks like a Ruby string and so on, but (and this is what's
>> ne
Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> means in pure Python code the string has python methods, but in Python
> using the CLR it gains the CLR methods. Presumably in Ruby code it looks
> like a Ruby string and so on, but (and this is what's new) it is the same
> object, not a bunch of language
On 3 May 2007 12:13:49 GMT, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am curious to know how it performs in comparison to CPython and an
>> efficient compiled Lisp like CMUCL. Speed is a major problem with
>> CPython but not with .NET or CMUCL, so it wi
sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am curious to know how it performs in comparison to CPython and an
> efficient compiled Lisp like CMUCL. Speed is a major problem with
> CPython but not with .NET or CMUCL, so it will be interesting to see
> how the DLR performs in comparison. It would b
On May 2, 8:22 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday Microsoft announced a new runtime for dynamic languages,
> which they call "DLR". It sits on top of the conventional .NET runtime
> (CLR) and provides services for dynamically typed languages like
> Python or Lisp (thus the cro
Pascal Costanza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That still doesn't explain what DLR actually does. You can implement
> these languages on top of the JVM as well. You could implement them on
> any Turing-complete language, for that matter. The interesting question
> how well integrated such an impl
On Thu, 3 May 2007 09:20:22 +0200, Stefan Scholl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are not allowed to publish .NET benchmarks. :-)
I'm pretty sure that only applied to their beta releases.
--
Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.
Real email: (replace (subseq "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 5) "edi")
--
In comp.lang.lisp sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am curious to know how it performs in comparison to CPython and an
> efficient compiled Lisp like CMUCL. Speed is a major problem with
You are not allowed to publish .NET benchmarks. :-)
--
Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (
Fuzzyman wrote:
> On May 2, 8:20 pm, Pascal Costanza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sturlamolden wrote:
>>> On Monday Microsoft announced a new runtime for dynamic languages,
>>> which they call "DLR". It sits on top of the conventional .NET runtime
>>> (CLR) and provides services for dynamically t
Kevin Haynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't python cross platform?
Sure -- why is that relevant?
Alex
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
sturlamolden wrote:
> On May 3, 2:15 am, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threads.
>>Thanks.
>
>
> The only off-topic posting in this thread is your own (and now this
> one).
> Begone.
FWIW, I took Kaz's remark to be m
Isn't python cross platform?
On Thursday 3 May 2007, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> On May 2, 11:22 am, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday Microsoft announced a new runtime for dynamic languages,
>
> Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threads.
> Thanks.
--
htt
On May 3, 2:15 am, Kaz Kylheku <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threads.
> Thanks.
The only off-topic posting in this thread is your own (and now this
one).
Begone.
S.M.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 2, 11:22 am, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday Microsoft announced a new runtime for dynamic languages,
Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threads.
Thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 2, 8:20 pm, Pascal Costanza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sturlamolden wrote:
> > On Monday Microsoft announced a new runtime for dynamic languages,
> > which they call "DLR". It sits on top of the conventional .NET runtime
> > (CLR) and provides services for dynamically typed languages like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On May 2, 1:22 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Monday Microsoft announced a new runtime for dynamic languages,
>>which they call "DLR". It sits on top of the conventional .NET runtime
>>(CLR) and provides services for dynamically typed languages lik
Re!
During we post messages, then blog of Jim Hugunin is updated:
http://blogs.msdn.com/hugunin/
--
@-salutations
Michel Claveau
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi!
DLR is include in SilverLight. See my message of yesterday.
For instant, DLR is for IronPython & JScript. Others languages are only
promised.
You can install SilverLight 1.1, and make your tests.
--
@-salutations
Michel Claveau
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 2, 1:22 pm, sturlamolden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday Microsoft announced a new runtime for dynamic languages,
> which they call "DLR". It sits on top of the conventional .NET runtime
> (CLR) and provides services for dynamically typed languages like
> Python or Lisp (thus the cro
sturlamolden wrote:
> On Monday Microsoft announced a new runtime for dynamic languages,
> which they call "DLR". It sits on top of the conventional .NET runtime
> (CLR) and provides services for dynamically typed languages like
> Python or Lisp (thus the cross-posting). Apparently is is distribut
29 matches
Mail list logo
