On May 4, 11:28 pm, Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luis M. González wrote: > > > Indeed, the subject is absolutely on-topic. > > If can't talk about a so called "Dynamic Languages Runtime" in a > > pyhton mailing list, I wonder what it takes to be considered on-topic. > > Frankly, this on-topic/off-topic fascism I see in this list is pissing > > me off a little bit. > > It's less on-topic for comp.lang.lisp, though, unless you want to > perform in a measuring competition with the Lisp crowd whilst hearing > how they did the very same thing as <insert technology here> way back > in the 1950s. Despite the permissive licences - it'd be hard to slap a > bad EULA on IronPython now - the whole thing demonstrates Microsoft's > disdain for open standards as usual,
How do you work that out? It seems like a very positive move from them. As for SilverLight, there will probably be a fully open implementation by the end of the year. Fuzzyman http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ironpython/index.shtml > but it remains on-topic for > comp.lang.python, I guess. > > Paul -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
