In article <3794b$55678d83$5419aafe$56...@news.ziggo.nl>, skybuck2000
@hotmail.com says...
>
> Hello,
>
> I was just coding and ran into a little logic problem which is as follows:
>
> There are two booleans/variables which can be either false or true.
>
> The desired thrutle table is:
>
> A =
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Tim Chase
wrote:
> On 2015-05-29 13:48, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> That said, though, using 0 for False and 1 for True is easily
>> the most common convention in use today, and the next most likely
>> case is that comparing booleans would give a simple and immediate
On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 23:48, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:20 PM, wrote:
> > The possibility of spelling these with the comparison operators, as some
> > have suggested, is a consequence of Python's implementation where True
> > == 1 and False == 0. In other languages bool
On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 23:49, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Ok thanks for this information.
>
> I was just wondering how many thruth table combinations there can be for
> a
> typical thruth table with 2 inputs and 1 output.
>
> Since there are 2 inputs, this means 4 possible outputs, which means 2 t
On Fri, 29 May 2015 13:48:55 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:20 PM, wrote:
>> The possibility of spelling these with the comparison operators, as
>> some have suggested, is a consequence of Python's implementation where
>> True == 1 and False == 0. In other languages boo
On 2015-05-29 13:48, Chris Angelico wrote:
> That said, though, using 0 for False and 1 for True is easily
> the most common convention in use today, and the next most likely
> case is that comparing booleans would give a simple and immediate
> error. So it's most likely to be safe to do.
There ar
On Fri, 29 May 2015 01:49 pm, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> wrote in message
> news:mailman.152.1432869623.5151.python-l...@python.org...
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 17:50, Skybuck Flying wrote:
>> Surpisingly enough I don't think there is a casual/common operator for
>> this
>> thruth table.
>>
>> AN
You may be interested in PyEda
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyeda
It is for electronic design automation. But it will minimise
truth tables for you.
http://pyeda.readthedocs.org/en/latest/search.html?q=truth+tables&check_keywords=yes&area=default
Laura
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
wrote in message news:mailman.152.1432869623.5151.python-l...@python.org...
On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 17:50, Skybuck Flying wrote:
Surpisingly enough I don't think there is a casual/common operator for
this
thruth table.
AND does not apply.
OR does not apply.
XOR does not apply.
"
All sixteen
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:20 PM, wrote:
> The possibility of spelling these with the comparison operators, as some
> have suggested, is a consequence of Python's implementation where True
> == 1 and False == 0. In other languages bool may not be relatable (or at
> least not orderable), or False m
On Thu, May 28, 2015, at 17:50, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Surpisingly enough I don't think there is a casual/common operator for
> this
> thruth table.
>
> AND does not apply.
> OR does not apply.
> XOR does not apply.
All sixteen possible logical operators have formal names. This one is
called "B
I am not so sure anymore about my conclusion, I will investigate this
further tomorrow.
It seems safe to conclude that at least the following operators have their
own thruth tables:
=
<>
<
=
<=
These are the comparision operators.
Assume True is greater than False allows them to be use
"Denis McMahon" wrote in message news:mk884e$gth$1...@dont-email.me...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:58:19 -0700, sohcahtoa82 wrote:
On Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 2:50:18 PM UTC-7, Skybuck Flying wrote:
Hello,
# Desired truth table for BotWaitForCooldown and CooldownDetected
# BotWaitForCooldo
Interestingly enough the shortest I have seen so far is ***:
def TestLogic( BotWaitForCooldown, CooldownDetected ):
# return BotWaitForCooldown or ((not BotWaitForCooldown) and
CooldownDetected) # this logic is flawed, please improve logic.
# return (not ((not BotWaitForCooldown) and CooldownD
On 05/28/2015 05:03 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-05-28, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2015-05-28, Michael Torrie wrote:
>>> On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, sohcahto...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the logic you're really looking for is:
return BotWaitForCooldown or (not (BotWaitForCooldown
On Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 3:17:10 PM UTC-7, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, sohcahto...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I think the logic you're really looking for is:
> >
> > return BotWaitForCooldown or (not (BotWaitForCooldown or CooldownDetected))
>
> Yes this is the simplest form. F
On Thu, 28 May 2015 14:58:19 -0700, sohcahtoa82 wrote:
> On Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 2:50:18 PM UTC-7, Skybuck Flying wrote:
>> Hello,
>> # Desired truth table for BotWaitForCooldown and CooldownDetected
>> # BotWaitForCooldown: CooldownDetected: Desired Result:
>> # FalseFalse
Skybuck Flying wrote:
Hello,
I was just coding and ran into a little logic problem which is as follows:
There are two booleans/variables which can be either false or true.
The desired thrutle table is:
A = input
B = input
C = output
A B C:
---
F F T
F T F
T F T
T T T
Surpisingly enough
On 2015-05-28, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-05-28, Michael Torrie wrote:
>> On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, sohcahto...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I think the logic you're really looking for is:
>>>
>>> return BotWaitForCooldown or (not (BotWaitForCooldown or CooldownDetected))
>>
>> Yes this is the simples
On 28/05/2015 23:39, Lew Pitcher wrote:
On Thursday May 28 2015 17:50, in comp.lang.c, "Skybuck Flying"
wrote:
Hello,
I was just coding and ran into a little logic problem which is as follows:
There are two booleans/variables which can be either false or true.
The desired thrutle table is:
On 2015-05-28, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, sohcahto...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I think the logic you're really looking for is:
>>
>> return BotWaitForCooldown or (not (BotWaitForCooldown or CooldownDetected))
>
> Yes this is the simplest form.
Not really.
In old school notation
On Thursday May 28 2015 17:50, in comp.lang.c, "Skybuck Flying"
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was just coding and ran into a little logic problem which is as follows:
>
> There are two booleans/variables which can be either false or true.
>
> The desired thrutle table is:
>
> A = input
> B = input
>
On 2015-05-28, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-05-28, Skybuck Flying wrote:
>
>> However I can already see I am not happy with this video solution.
>>
>> I have 3 true outputs, and only 1 false output.
>>
>> That would require a lot of logic.
>>
>> I guess I can turn it around and negate the whole
On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, sohcahto...@gmail.com wrote:
> I think the logic you're really looking for is:
>
> return BotWaitForCooldown or (not (BotWaitForCooldown or CooldownDetected))
Yes this is the simplest form. For more complicated truth tables you
can create a K map and then apply a reductio
Ok, problem solved for now, it seems:
I used video tutorial method and inverted it for the false case ;)
But anyway... I would not only need a "thruth table to logic/boolean
operations converter" but also a "boolean operations optimizer" ;)
# loop has to run if:
# while DesiredResult==True:
#
On 2015-05-28, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> However I can already see I am not happy with this video solution.
>
> I have 3 true outputs, and only 1 false output.
>
> That would require a lot of logic.
>
> I guess I can turn it around and negate the whole thing... and focus on the
> false output.
Do
On 2015-05-28, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2015-05-28, Skybuck Flying wrote:
>
>> I tried logic below... but funny enough it failed, now I feel like a
>> noob lol and share this funny little fail logic with you.
>>
>> Can you improve/fix the logic ?
>
>> # while DesiredResult==True:
>> # Desired tr
Skybuck Flying writes:
> There are two booleans/variables which can be either false or true.
>
> The desired thrutle table is:
>
> A = input
> B = input
> C = output
>
> A B C:
> ---
> F F T
> F T F
> T F T
> T T T
That's A >= B, where True >= False:
>>> BB = False, True
>>> print(*((A,
However I can already see I am not happy with this video solution.
I have 3 true outputs, and only 1 false output.
That would require a lot of logic.
I guess I can turn it around and negate the whole thing... and focus on the
false output.
Bye,
Skybuck.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman
This is a start lol:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKqTSBKmWA4
I wonder if it can be simplied... I'll give it a try.
Basically it comes down to creating a logic expression for each true result
in the desired output and or-ing with each other.
The variables leading to the true result in the
On 2015-05-28, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> I tried logic below... but funny enough it failed, now I feel like a
> noob lol and share this funny little fail logic with you.
>
> Can you improve/fix the logic ?
> # while DesiredResult==True:
> # Desired truth table for BotWaitForCooldown and CooldownDe
On Thursday, May 28, 2015 at 2:50:18 PM UTC-7, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was just coding and ran into a little logic problem which is as follows:
>
> There are two booleans/variables which can be either false or true.
>
> The desired thrutle table is:
>
> A = input
> B = input
> C =
On 2015-05-28 23:50, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> A = input
> B = input
> C = output
>
> A B C:
> ---
> F F T
> F T F
> T F T
> T T T
>
> Surpisingly enough I don't think there is a casual/common operator
> for this thruth table.
>
> AND does not apply.
> OR does not apply.
> XOR does not apply.
I think I have run into this problem before... but solved it with some
seperate if statements.
However in this case/this time I would like to not solve it with if
statements, but simply and/or/not/xor, in other words, boolean operators.
So what would help is a "thruth table to logic" converto
Hello,
I was just coding and ran into a little logic problem which is as follows:
There are two booleans/variables which can be either false or true.
The desired thrutle table is:
A = input
B = input
C = output
A B C:
---
F F T
F T F
T F T
T T T
Surpisingly enough I don't think there is
35 matches
Mail list logo
