On 2015-05-28, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 2015-05-28, Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, sohcahto...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I think the logic you're really looking for is:
>>>
>>> return BotWaitForCooldown or (not (BotWaitForCooldown or CooldownDetected))
>>
>> Yes this is the simplest form.
>
> Not really.
>
>
> In old school notation, that's
> ___
> A + A+B
>
> [...]
That derivation was excessively round-about. Here is the same thing
in fewer steps:
Invert:
_______
___
A + A+B
De Morgan:
_
A * (A + B)
Distribute:
_ _
A*A + A*B
Drop the null term:
_
A*B
Invert (to cancel out the first step)
___
_
A*B
De Morgan:
_
A+B
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I'm reporting for duty
at as a modern person. I want
gmail.com to do the Latin Hustle now!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
