"Dan" wrote:
> Would it be possible to have pychecker (or some such) warn that there
> is an insufficient parameter count to start_new_thread? I guess that
> would require knowing the type of thread. . .
I think this is the hub of the thing - its not only start_new_thread, but
the way that par
Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> "Duncan Booth" wrote:
>
>> Given that the start_new_thread function never actually got called, what
>> code exactly do you expect to complain about the absence of a tuple?
>
> I don't understand this assertion.
>
> I thought that start_new_thread was called with a
"Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> > It would have been nice, however, to have gotten something like:
> >
> > TypeError - This routine needs a tuple.
> >
> > instead of the silent in line calling of the routine in question,
> > while failing actually to start a new thread.
>
Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> "Bjoern Schliessmann" wrote:
>
> Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
>> Absolutely! - well spotted!
>
> This is no threading problem at all; not even a syntax problem. If
> you don't know exactly what start_new_thread and kbd_driver
> functions do it's impossible to tell if yo
"Duncan Booth" wrote:
> Given that the start_new_thread function never actually got called, what
> code exactly do you expect to complain about the absence of a tuple?
I don't understand this assertion.
I thought that start_new_thread was called with a missing comma in
its argument list, whic
"Bjoern Schliessmann" wrote:
Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> Absolutely! - well spotted!
This is no threading problem at all; not even a syntax problem. If
you don't know exactly what start_new_thread and kbd_driver
functions do it's impossible to tell if your code does what is
intended.
> It would
Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Of course start_new_thread could throw an error if it got nothing callable
>as first argument. No idea why it doesn't.
It does:
>>> thread.start_new_thread(None, None)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
TypeError: first arg must
Dan schrieb:
> On Jan 16, 1:33 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dan schrieb:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 16, 11:06 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> "Dan" wrote:
> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,
On Jan 16, 1:33 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan schrieb:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 16, 11:06 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> >>> "Dan" wrote:
> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,kbd_q))
> Need
Dan schrieb:
> On Jan 16, 11:06 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
>>> "Dan" wrote:
>>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,kbd_q))
Needs to be
>>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver, (port_q,kbd_q)
On Jan 16, 11:06 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> > "Dan" wrote:
>
> >> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,kbd_q))
>
> >> Needs to be
> >> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver, (port_q,kbd_q))
>
> >> C
Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> "Dan" wrote:
>
>
>> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,kbd_q))
>>
>> Needs to be
>> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver, (port_q,kbd_q))
>>
>> Commas are important!
>>
>> -Dan
>
> Absolutely! - well spotted!
>
>
Hendrik van Rooyen wrote:
> Absolutely! - well spotted!
This is no threading problem at all; not even a syntax problem. If
you don't know exactly what start_new_thread and kbd_driver
functions do it's impossible to tell if your code does what is
intended.
> It would have been nice, however, to ha
"Hendrik van Rooyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would have been nice, however, to have gotten something like:
>
> TypeError - This routine needs a tuple.
>
> instead of the silent in line calling of the routine in question,
> while failing actually to start a new thread.
Given that the sta
"Dan" wrote:
> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,kbd_q))
>
> Needs to be
> >>> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver, (port_q,kbd_q))
>
> Commas are important!
>
> -Dan
Absolutely! - well spotted!
As the first correct respondent, you win the fre
On Jan 15, 10:07 am, "Hendrik van Rooyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I thought I would share this nasty little gotcha with the group.
>
> Consider the following code fragment:
>
>
> print 'starting kbd thread'
> keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,kbd_q))
> print 'starti
I thought I would share this nasty little gotcha with the group.
Consider the following code fragment:
print 'starting kbd thread'
keyboard_thread = thread.start_new_thread(kbd_driver (port_q,kbd_q))
print 'starting main loop'
error = Mainloop(s,port_q,active_q_list)
It produces, as output, t
17 matches
Mail list logo
