Hendrik van Rooyen wrote: > "Duncan Booth" <dunc...d.invalid> wrote: > >> Given that the start_new_thread function never actually got called, what >> code exactly do you expect to complain about the absence of a tuple? > > I don't understand this assertion. > > I thought that start_new_thread was called with a missing comma in > its argument list, which had the effect that I am complaining about. > > Putting the comma in place solved the problem, without any other > changes, so why do you say that start_new_thread was not called?
Well, when kbd_driver() is called the kbd_q queue is probably empty, and as kbd_driver() runs in the main thread, who could ever put something into that queue? The function will therefore never terminate. Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
