On 1/26/2023 6:39 PM, Barry wrote:
On 26 Jan 2023, at 17:32, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 1/26/2023 11:41 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 03:34, Thomas Passin wrote:
A nice theory but nothing to do with the real world. I've had a number
of laptops that overheat (or would, if
On 1/26/2023 10:32 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 14:21, Thomas Passin wrote:
2. "What is Tjunction max temperature?"
Tjunction max is the maximum thermal junction temperature that a
processor will allow prior to using internal thermal control mechanisms
to reduce power and li
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 14:21, Thomas Passin wrote:
> 2. "What is Tjunction max temperature?"
> Tjunction max is the maximum thermal junction temperature that a
> processor will allow prior to using internal thermal control mechanisms
> to reduce power and limit temperature. Activation of the proce
On 1/26/2023 5:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 06:54, Thomas Passin wrote:
Did you get a warning, or did you just decide to stop the test?
(At least) one of the utilities, I forget which one, did show the
temperature in a danger zone.
I'm very curious as to which utility
> On 26 Jan 2023, at 17:32, Thomas Passin wrote:
>
> On 1/26/2023 11:41 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 03:34, Thomas Passin wrote:
>>> A nice theory but nothing to do with the real world. I've had a number
>>> of laptops that overheat (or would, if I let test program co
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 06:54, Thomas Passin wrote:
> > Did you get a warning, or did you just decide to stop the test?
>
> (At least) one of the utilities, I forget which one, did show the
> temperature in a danger zone.
I'm very curious as to which utility, and on what basis it called it
"danger
On 1/26/2023 12:57 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 04:31, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 1/26/2023 11:41 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 03:34, Thomas Passin wrote:
A nice theory but nothing to do with the real world. I've had a number
of laptops that overheat (o
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 04:31, Thomas Passin wrote:
>
> On 1/26/2023 11:41 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 03:34, Thomas Passin wrote:
> >> A nice theory but nothing to do with the real world. I've had a number
> >> of laptops that overheat (or would, if I let test program co
On 1/26/2023 11:41 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 03:34, Thomas Passin wrote:
A nice theory but nothing to do with the real world. I've had a number
of laptops that overheat (or would, if I let test program continue)
running this test program.
Define "overheat". If all you'
On 2023-01-26, Thomas Passin wrote:
> On 1/26/2023 11:02 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>> A properly designed laptop with a non-broken OS will not overheat
>> regardless of the computing load you throw at it. The fan might get
>> annoying loud, but if it overheats either your hardware or OS
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 03:34, Thomas Passin wrote:
> A nice theory but nothing to do with the real world. I've had a number
> of laptops that overheat (or would, if I let test program continue)
> running this test program.
Define "overheat". If all you're saying is "the fan began to whine and
I
On 1/26/2023 11:02 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2023-01-26, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 1/25/2023 7:38 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2023-01-25 16:30:56 -0500, Thomas Passin wrote:
Great! Don't forget what I said about potential overheating if you
hit the server with as many requests as it can ha
On 1/25/2023 4:30 PM, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 1/25/2023 3:29 PM, Dino wrote:
Great! Don't forget what I said about potential overheating if you hit
the server with as many requests as it can handle.
Noted. Thank you.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> On Jan 26, 2023, at 11:02 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> On 2023-01-26, Thomas Passin wrote:
>> On 1/25/2023 7:38 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>>> On 2023-01-25 16:30:56 -0500, Thomas Passin wrote:
Great! Don't forget what I said about potential overheating if you
hit the server with
On 2023-01-26, Thomas Passin wrote:
> On 1/25/2023 7:38 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>> On 2023-01-25 16:30:56 -0500, Thomas Passin wrote:
>>> Great! Don't forget what I said about potential overheating if you
>>> hit the server with as many requests as it can handle.
>>
>> Frankly, if you can ove
On 1/25/2023 11:23 PM, Dino wrote:
On 1/25/2023 3:27 PM, Dino wrote:
On 1/25/2023 1:33 PM, orzodk wrote:
I have used locust with success in the past.
https://locust.io
First impression, exactly what I need. Thank you Orzo!
the more I learn about Locust and I tinker with it, the more I lov
On 1/25/2023 3:27 PM, Dino wrote:
On 1/25/2023 1:33 PM, orzodk wrote:
I have used locust with success in the past.
https://locust.io
First impression, exactly what I need. Thank you Orzo!
the more I learn about Locust and I tinker with it, the more I love it.
Thanks again.
--
https://mai
On 1/25/2023 8:36 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 12:06, Thomas Passin wrote:
On 1/25/2023 7:38 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2023-01-25 16:30:56 -0500, Thomas Passin wrote:
Great! Don't forget what I said about potential overheating if you
hit the server with as many reque
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 12:06, Thomas Passin wrote:
>
> On 1/25/2023 7:38 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> > On 2023-01-25 16:30:56 -0500, Thomas Passin wrote:
> >> Great! Don't forget what I said about potential overheating if you
> >> hit the server with as many requests as it can handle.
> >
> > Fr
On 1/25/2023 7:38 PM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
On 2023-01-25 16:30:56 -0500, Thomas Passin wrote:
Great! Don't forget what I said about potential overheating if you
hit the server with as many requests as it can handle.
Frankly, if you can overheat a server by hitting it with HTTP requests,
get
On 2023-01-25 16:30:56 -0500, Thomas Passin wrote:
> Great! Don't forget what I said about potential overheating if you
> hit the server with as many requests as it can handle.
Frankly, if you can overheat a server by hitting it with HTTP requests,
get better hardware and/or put it into a place w
On 1/25/2023 3:29 PM, Dino wrote:
On 1/25/2023 1:21 PM, Thomas Passin wrote:
I actually have a Python program that does exactly this.
Thank you, Thomas. I'll check out Locust, mentioned by Orzodk, as it
looks like a mature library that appears to do exactly what I was hoping.
Great! Don
On 1/25/2023 1:21 PM, Thomas Passin wrote:
I actually have a Python program that does exactly this.
Thank you, Thomas. I'll check out Locust, mentioned by Orzodk, as it
looks like a mature library that appears to do exactly what I was hoping.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo
On 1/25/2023 1:33 PM, orzodk wrote:
I have used locust with success in the past.
https://locust.io
First impression, exactly what I need. Thank you Orzo!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dino writes:
> Hello, I could use something like Apache ab in Python (
> https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/programs/ab.html ).
>
> The reason why ab doesn't quite cut it for me is that I need to define
> a pool of HTTP requests and I want the tool to run those (as opposed
> to running the same re
On 1/25/2023 10:53 AM, Dino wrote:
Hello, I could use something like Apache ab in Python (
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/programs/ab.html ).
The reason why ab doesn't quite cut it for me is that I need to define a
pool of HTTP requests and I want the tool to run those (as opposed to
run
Hello, I could use something like Apache ab in Python (
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/programs/ab.html ).
The reason why ab doesn't quite cut it for me is that I need to define a
pool of HTTP requests and I want the tool to run those (as opposed to
running the same request over and over
27 matches
Mail list logo
