"Steve Holden" schrieb
>
> I simply meant that the whole source has to be presented
> to the exec statement and not chunked into lines.
>
That's what I meant: With exec open(f).read() it is not
broken into several exec invocations.
>
> I was probably just a little over-zealous in pursuing
>
Martin Blume wrote:
> "Steve Holden" schrieb
>>> [ difference between exec open(fname).read()
>>>and for line in open(fname): exec line ]
>>>
>>> So it seems to depend on the way the file is read.
>>>
>> It depends on the way the lines of the file are executed,
>> not how they are read.
>>
"Steve Holden" schrieb
> >
> > [ difference between exec open(fname).read()
> >and for line in open(fname): exec line ]
> >
> > So it seems to depend on the way the file is read.
> >
> It depends on the way the lines of the file are executed,
> not how they are read.
>
Could you elaborate
On Fri, 18 May 2007 04:45:30, Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
>On 17 May 2007 13:12:10 -0700, i3dmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declaimed
>the following in comp.lang.python:
>
>> 'b' is generally useful on systems that don't treat binary and text
>> files differently. It will improve porta
Martin Blume wrote:
> "Steve Holden" schrieb
Try it on a file that reads something like
xxx = 42
print xxx
and you will see NameError raised because the assignment
hasn't affected the environment for the print statement.
>>> [...]
>>>
>> No, because there i
On May 17, 3:02 am, Douglas Woodrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:30:23, i3dmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>
> >f = open(file,'rb')
> >for i in f:
> >exec i
>
> Why are you opening the file in binary mode?
>
> --
> Doug Woodrow
'b' is generally useful on systems tha
"Steve Holden" schrieb
> >>
> >> Try it on a file that reads something like
> >>
> >> xxx = 42
> >> print xxx
> >>
> >> and you will see NameError raised because the assignment
> >> hasn't affected the environment for the print statement.
> >>
> > [...]
> >
> No, because there isn't one. Now try
Steve Holden a écrit :
> i3dmaster wrote:
>> On May 16, 1:05 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Martin Blume wrote:
"tmp123" schrieb >
> We have very big files with python commands
> (more or less, 50 commands each file).
> It is possible to execute them command by
i3dmaster wrote:
> On May 16, 1:05 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Martin Blume wrote:
>>> "tmp123" schrieb >
We have very big files with python commands
(more or less, 50 commands each file).
It is possible to execute them command by command,
>>> inp = open(cmd_fi
On Thu, 17 May 2007 00:30:23, i3dmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>f = open(file,'rb')
>for i in f:
>exec i
Why are you opening the file in binary mode?
--
Doug Woodrow
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On May 16, 1:05 pm, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Blume wrote:
> > "tmp123" schrieb >
> >> We have very big files with python commands
> >> (more or less, 50 commands each file).
>
> >> It is possible to execute them command by command,
>
> > inp = open(cmd_file)
> > for line
Martin Blume wrote:
> "tmp123" schrieb >
>> We have very big files with python commands
>> (more or less, 50 commands each file).
>>
>> It is possible to execute them command by command,
>
> inp = open(cmd_file)
> for line in inp:
> exec line
>
> might help. You don't get quite the sam
"tmp123" schrieb >
> We have very big files with python commands
> (more or less, 50 commands each file).
>
> It is possible to execute them command by command,
inp = open(cmd_file)
for line in inp:
exec line
might help. You don't get quite the same feeling as
"like if the commands wa
tmp123 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> We have very big files with python commands (more or less, 50
> commands each file).
>
Those are BIG programs. Presumably other programs are writing them?
> It is possible to execute them command by command, like if the
> commands was typ
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, tmp123 wrote:
> We have very big files with python commands (more or less, 50
> commands each file).
>
> It is possible to execute them command by command, like if the
> commands was typed one after the other in a interactive session?
Take a look at the `code` module
Hello,
Thanks for your time.
We have very big files with python commands (more or less, 50
commands each file).
It is possible to execute them command by command, like if the
commands was typed one after the other in a interactive session?
( Better using command flags than with an small scr
16 matches
Mail list logo
