> Chris Withers (CW) wrote:
>CW> Piet van Oostrum wrote:
John Machin (JM) wrote:
>>>
>JM> [1] No kidding: http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=QMwnEBAJ
>>>
>>> Apart from these patents probably being silly, why don't they just write
>>> the code in Python? :=)
>CW> Would be
Piet van Oostrum wrote:
John Machin (JM) wrote:
JM> [1] No kidding: http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=QMwnEBAJ
Apart from these patents probably being silly, why don't they just write
the code in Python? :=)
Would be cool, but there are things like
Resolver One (http://www.resol
