>>>>> Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk> (CW) wrote:
>CW> Piet van Oostrum wrote: >>>>>>>> John Machin <sjmac...@lexicon.net> (JM) wrote: >>> >JM> [1] No kidding: http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=QMwnAAAAEBAJ >>> >>> Apart from these patents probably being silly, why don't they just write >>> the code in Python? :=) >CW> Would be cool, but there are things like >CW> Resolver One (http://www.resolversystems.com/product/) >CW> and >CW> DiscoveryScript (http://www.xefion.com/en/discoveryscript.html) >CW> ...that help. Actually, I meant writing the patent application in Python :=) instead of this pseudo-exact legalese with goto instructions for the control flow. -- Piet van Oostrum <p...@cs.uu.nl> URL: http://pietvanoostrum.com [PGP 8DAE142BE17999C4] Private email: p...@vanoostrum.org -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
