Hi Gregory,
On 07/12/13 08:39, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Garthy wrote:
>> To allow each script to run in its own environment, with minimal
>> chance of inadvertent interaction between the environments, whilst
>> allowing each script the ability to stall on conditions that will be
>> later met by an
Hi Gregory,
On 07/12/13 08:53, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Garthy wrote:
>> The bare minimum would be protection against inadvertent interaction.
>> Better yet would be a setup that made such interaction annoyingly
>> difficult, and the ideal would be where it was impossible to interfere.
>
> To give
Garthy wrote:
The bare minimum would be
protection against inadvertent interaction. Better yet would be a setup
that made such interaction annoyingly difficult, and the ideal would be
where it was impossible to interfere.
To give you an idea of the kind of interference that's
possible, consi
Garthy wrote:
To allow each script to run in its own environment, with minimal chance
of inadvertent interaction between the environments, whilst allowing
each script the ability to stall on conditions that will be later met by
another thread supplying the information, and to fit in with existi
Hi Tim,
On 06/12/13 20:47, Tim Golden wrote:
On 06/12/2013 09:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Garthy
wrote:
PS. Apologies if any of these messages come through more than once. Most
lists that I've posted to set reply-to meaning a normal reply can be used,
but pytho
Hi Chris,
On 06/12/13 22:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Garthy
> wrote:
>> I think the ideal is completely sandboxed, but it's something that I
>> understand I may need to make compromises on. The bare minimum would be
>> protection against inadvertent interaction.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Garthy
wrote:
> I think the ideal is completely sandboxed, but it's something that I
> understand I may need to make compromises on. The bare minimum would be
> protection against inadvertent interaction. Better yet would be a setup that
> made such interaction anno
On 06/12/2013 09:27, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Garthy
> wrote:
>> PS. Apologies if any of these messages come through more than once. Most
>> lists that I've posted to set reply-to meaning a normal reply can be used,
>> but python-list does not seem to. The replies I
Hi Chris,
On 06/12/13 19:57, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Garthy
> wrote:
>> PS. Apologies if any of these messages come through more than once. Most
>> lists that I've posted to set reply-to meaning a normal reply can be
used,
>> but python-list does not seem to.
Hi Chris,
On 06/12/13 19:03, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Garthy
> wrote:
>> Hi Chris (and Michael),
>
> Hehe. People often say that to me IRL, addressing me and my brother.
> But he isn't on python-list, so you clearly mean Michael Torrie, yet
> my brain still autom
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Garthy
wrote:
> PS. Apologies if any of these messages come through more than once. Most
> lists that I've posted to set reply-to meaning a normal reply can be used,
> but python-list does not seem to. The replies I have sent manually to
> python-list@python.org ins
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Garthy
wrote:
> Hi Chris (and Michael),
Hehe. People often say that to me IRL, addressing me and my brother.
But he isn't on python-list, so you clearly mean Michael Torrie, yet
my brain still automatically thought you were addressing Michael
Angelico :)
> To allo
Hi Gregory,
On 06/12/13 17:28, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Garthy wrote:
>> I am running into problems when using multiple interpreters [1] and I
>> am presently trying to track down these issues. Can anyone familiar
>> with the process of embedding multiple interprete
Hi all,
A small update here:
On 06/12/13 13:04, Garthy wrote:
> [1] It presently crashes in Py_EndInterpreter() after running through a
> series of tests during the shutdown of the 32nd interpreter I create. I
> don't know if this is significant, but the tests pass for the first 31
> interprete
Hi Chris (and Michael),
On 06/12/13 15:46, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 07:34 PM, Garthy wrote:
>> - My fallback if I can't do this is to implement each instance in a
>> dedicated *process* rather than per-thread. However, there is a
>> significant cost to doing this that I would rather
Hi all,
A small update here:
On 06/12/13 13:04, Garthy wrote:
> [1] It presently crashes in Py_EndInterpreter() after running through a
> series of tests during the shutdown of the 32nd interpreter I create. I
> don't know if this is significant, but the tests pass for the first 31
> interpreter
Hi Chris (and Michael),
On 06/12/13 15:51, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 12/05/2013 07:34 PM, Garthy wrote:
- My fallback if I can't do this is to implement each instance in a
dedicated *process* rather than per-thread. However, there is a
sig
Hi Gregory,
On 06/12/13 17:28, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Garthy wrote:
>> I am running into problems when using multiple interpreters [1] and I
>> am presently trying to track down these issues. Can anyone familiar
>> with the process of embedding multiple interprete
Garthy wrote:
I am running into problems when using multiple interpreters [1] and
I am presently trying to track down these issues. Can anyone familiar
with the process of embedding multiple interpreters have a skim of the
details below and let me know of any obvious problems?
As far as I
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 12/05/2013 07:34 PM, Garthy wrote:
>> - My fallback if I can't do this is to implement each instance in a
>> dedicated *process* rather than per-thread. However, there is a
>> significant cost to doing this that I would rather not incur.
>
On 12/05/2013 07:34 PM, Garthy wrote:
> - My fallback if I can't do this is to implement each instance in a
> dedicated *process* rather than per-thread. However, there is a
> significant cost to doing this that I would rather not incur.
What cost is this? Are you speaking of cost in terms of wh
] and
I am presently trying to track down these issues. Can anyone familiar
with the process of embedding multiple interpreters have a skim of the
details below and let me know of any obvious problems? If I can get the
essentials right, then presumably it's just a matter of my tracking
22 matches
Mail list logo
