Someone wrote:
I'm just curious whether this
argument against dynamic typing - that you end up doing the job of a
static compiler in test code - holds in practice.
I suspect that, although some of the things caught
by the tests would be caught by static typing, the
very *same* tests are also ca
On Apr 30, 10:47 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > A rather off-topic and perhaps naive question, but isn't a 1:4
> > production/test ratio a bit too much ? Is there a guesstimate of what
> > percentage of this test code tests for things that you would get for
> > free in a statically typed language
>
> A rather off-topic and perhaps naive question, but isn't a 1:4
> production/test ratio a bit too much ? Is there a guesstimate of what
> percentage of this test code tests for things that you would get for
> free in a statically typed language ? I'm just curious whether this
> argument against
On Apr 29, 2:25 pm, Fuzzyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are around 30 000 lines of Python in the production code and
> about 120 000 lines of Python code in the test framework.
A rather off-topic and perhaps naive question, but isn't a 1:4
production/test ratio a bit too much ? Is there a
