On Feb 14, 11:35 am, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 13Feb2011 14:47, rantingrick wrote:
> | On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, Steven D'Aprano +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>
> | > The official stance of the Python development team is that 2.7 and 3.x
> | > will co-exist for a long, long time. Removing
On 13Feb2011 14:47, rantingrick wrote:
| On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
| > The official stance of the Python development team is that 2.7 and 3.x
| > will co-exist for a long, long time. Removing 2.x tutorials would be
| > cutting off our nose to spite our face.
|
| That is BS Steve
On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> The official stance of the Python development team is that 2.7 and 3.x
> will co-exist for a long, long time. Removing 2.x tutorials would be
> cutting off our nose to spite our face.
That is BS Steven and you know it! Of course we are going to suppor
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:03:18 -0600, Thomas L. Shinnick wrote:
> At 01:18 PM 2/13/2011, rantingrick wrote:
>>If any tutorial owners refuse to cooperate we need to remove their
>>tutorials (and/or links to their tutorials) from the official Python
>>website forever.
>
> How many tutorials have you
>However *we* are going to move forward with or
>without you.
In other words: We in RR's book means RR and this silent majority that
has pitched in so much work to back his last call to move forward, that
we're now boggling in awe at a new Idol. And moving forward means
posting lots of trash, (
On Feb 13, 3:03 pm, "Thomas L. Shinnick" wrote:
>
> In a city I used to live in, a long while ago, ...
>
> You would stop at a red light at a downtown corner and some unkempt
> fellow would lurch out of nowhere, stagger onto your hood, smear his
> dirty rag over a part of your windshield once or t
At 01:18 PM 2/13/2011, rantingrick wrote:
If any tutorial owners refuse to cooperate we need to remove their
tutorials (and/or links to their tutorials) from the official Python
website forever.
How many tutorials have you written?
In a city I used to live in, a long while ago, ...
You would
Hahaha. You've got a new one every week, don't you. What happened to the
demand to evolve idol into the future or whatever the BS you were
parroting was? So we're on TKInter being fixed/replaced, (which you
haven't worked with the steps people gave you), Idol being forked and
redone, (again whi
PS:
--
Open Invitation:
--
I am more than willing to help out those who need to bring Python2.x
tutorials into 3.x compliance (and i invite others to get involved!).
I would prefer to convert all to 3.x tutorials and not engage in
"monkey patching" by annotating
We need to start demanding that folks move towards 3.0 compliance with
their tutorials. Most of the functionality in Python3000 is available
from the __future__ module, especially in Python2.6 and up. There is
no reason to continue supporting deprecated tutorials. If someone is
still using an very
10 matches
Mail list logo
