On 13Feb2011 14:47, rantingrick <rantingr...@gmail.com> wrote: | On Feb 13, 4:30 pm, Steven D'Aprano <steve | +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: | > The official stance of the Python development team is that 2.7 and 3.x | > will co-exist for a long, long time. Removing 2.x tutorials would be | > cutting off our nose to spite our face. | | That is BS Steven and you know it! Of course we are going to support | 2.x for a long, long, time. Heck we even have downloads available for | Python1.x. I am talking about TUTORIALS steven, TUTORIALS!
Steven is also talking about tutorials. Perhaps my comprehension skiils are weak; I am basing my assrtion on his use of the word "tutorials" in the sentence: Removing 2.x tutorials would be cutting off our nose to spite our face. I admit my reading here may be superficial and that you may be seeing a deeper intent. [...] | [...] Stop spreading lies Steven. [...] | PS: The only troll here is YOU! [...] I confess to finding these two sentences in your message contradictory. Again, my poor comprehension skills must be to blame. Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ That's just the sort of bloody stupid name they would choose. - Reginald Mitchell, designer of the Spitfire -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list