Gernot Hassenpflug wrote:
Crap, what the hell are *you* doing here, Arved. This is so frightening!
LOL
Gernot (shocked to find people have other interests, hehe)
Thanks for cross posting this to five different newsgroups. Your
garbage is not wanted here, here being clj.programmer. Learn
Xah Lee wrote:
over the past 15 years, every few months i got emails from authors for
permission request of materials on my website.
today, while searching for my name on google, i found a result in
books.google.com . Out of curiosity, i searched my name in
books.google.com, and here's a hilario
over the past 15 years, every few months i got emails from authors for
permission request of materials on my website.
today, while searching for my name on google, i found a result in
books.google.com . Out of curiosity, i searched my name in
books.google.com, and here's a hilarious result:
Machi
On Mar 7, 6:52 pm, Xah Lee wrote:
> Of interest:
>
> • Why Can't You Be Normal?
Though I doubt this will do any good, I'll offer some advice that
hasn't been mentioned here and solved a lot of the problems I've had
early in life with resistance to overly-emotional negative reactions
to my opinion
"Bruce C. Miller" writes:
> On Mar 7, 6:52 pm, Xah Lee wrote:
>> Of interest:
>>
>> • Why Can't You Be Normal?
>
> Though I doubt this will do any good, I'll offer some advice that
> hasn't been mentioned here and solved a lot of the problems I've had
> early in life with resistance to overly-em
> There you go: a 30-second psychological diagnosis by an
> electrical engineer based entirely on Usenet postings. Â It
> doesn't get much more worthless than that...
>
> --
> Grant
rolf but interesting post nonetheless. I have been really somewhat
fascinated by AS since I heard of it about a dec
"Kenneth Tilton" wrote:
>
> ps. when the hell do I get an eponymous banning thread?! I have been
> flaming this damn group for 13 years and no recognition!! k
>
Well you are obviously not trying hard enough, so you have nobody
but yourself to blame if you get pipped at the post after 13 years
Craig Allen wrote:
There you go: a 30-second psychological diagnosis by an
electrical engineer based entirely on Usenet postings. It
doesn't get much more worthless than that...
--
Grant
rolf but interesting post nonetheless. I have been really somewhat
fascinated by AS since I heard of it a
Anybody else notice that "xah lee" is "eel hax" spelt backwards?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:15:19 -0400, Lew wrote:
> s...@netherlands.com wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:08:54 -0400, Lew wrote:
>>
>>> Larry Gates wrote:
For me, the worst thing is when I'm programming, and a bug *actually* gets
on my monitor. In real life, I'm this tough person: a rug
In comp.lang.lisp Xah Lee wrote:
> Some people says that i don't participate in discussion, and this is
> part of the reason they think i'm a so-called ?troll?. Actually i do,
> and read every reply to my post, as well have replied to technical
> questions other posted. Most replies to my posts a
On 2009-03-10, Tim Wintle wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:28 -0700, Luis Gonzalez wrote:
>> C'mon guys, Xha Lee always wins, because fools like you get mad at him
>> instead of ignoring him.
>
> Here here!
Hear hear!
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! FROZEN ENTREES ma
> Xah Lee schrieb (and how...)
For Google Groups users, there is a kill file implementation for
Firefox / Greasemonkey: http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html
hth, Tom
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Xah Lee schrieb:
Christian wrote:
On Mar 9, 1:22 pm, Christian wrote:
XahLeeschrieb:> Of interest:
⢠Why Can't You Be Normal?
http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
IMHO the point that you never reply to responds is what makes it
problematic.
I have seen 10 or mor
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:28 -0700, Luis Gonzalez wrote:
> C'mon guys, Xha Lee always wins, because fools like you get mad at him
> instead of ignoring him.
Here here!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
s...@netherlands.com wrote:
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:08:54 -0400, Lew wrote:
Larry Gates wrote:
For me, the worst thing is when I'm programming, and a bug *actually* gets
on my monitor. In real life, I'm this tough person: a rugged tradesmen.
I'm so phobic of bugs that I'll run away screaming
On 10 mar, 00:54, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-03-10, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>
> > "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" writes:
> >> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>
> >>> Don't worry, Xah. At least, my minds is running on your rails.
> >>> Please do not stop. BTW, what do you think about using Gnus
> >>> instead of G
On 2009-03-10, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" writes:
>> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>>
>>> Don't worry, Xah. At least, my minds is running on your rails.
>>> Please do not stop. BTW, what do you think about using Gnus
>>> instead of G2/1.0?
>>
>> So you are going to repeat his postings
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:25:16 -0700, Jürgen Exner
wrote:
>>I'm certain he's the smartest computer guy on his street.
>
> Make that "he ist certain, he is the smartest computer guy".
Which street? in a modern city? someplace in the developed world?
This we need to know
--
http://mail.py
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:08:54 -0400, Lew wrote:
>Larry Gates wrote:
>> For me, the worst thing is when I'm programming, and a bug *actually* gets
>> on my monitor. In real life, I'm this tough person: a rugged tradesmen.
>> I'm so phobic of bugs that I'll run away screaming like a girl.
>
>I had
Larry Gates wrote:
>>> comp.lang.lisp is cool so here Xah participates as a normal contributor.
>I'm certain he's the smartest computer guy on his street.
Make that "he ist certain, he is the smartest computer guy".
jue
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
>Xah Lee wrote:
Subject: Ban Xah Lee
My vote: YES
jue
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Christian wrote:
... [Xah Lee] seems to be mostly doing a often highly intelligent monologue ...
Really?
--
Lew
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Larry Gates wrote:
For me, the worst thing is when I'm programming, and a bug *actually* gets
on my monitor. In real life, I'm this tough person: a rugged tradesmen.
I'm so phobic of bugs that I'll run away screaming like a girl.
I had a smudge on my monitor some years ago. It was on the fram
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:37:50 +, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
> Kenneth Tilton wrote:
>> Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
>>> Larry Gates wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:09:52 +, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
> Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
>> Well, don't worry - nobody is go
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" writes:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:38:24 +0900
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
>> Xah Lee writes:
> [snip]
>> Don't worry, Xah. At least, my minds is running on your rails. Please do
>> not stop. BTW, what do you think about using Gnus instead of G2/1.0?
>
> So you are going to repeat
Xah Lee wrote:
> Christian wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 1:22 pm, Christian wrote:
>> XahLeeschrieb:> Of interest:
>>
>> > ⢠Why Can't You Be Normal?
>> > http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
>>
>> IMHO the point that you never reply to responds is what makes it
>> problematic
Kenneth Tilton wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Larry Gates wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:09:52 +, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Well, don't worry - nobody is going to ban you from Usenet (except
possibly the Chinese govt).
OTOH, nobody here much cares.
Christian wrote:
On Mar 9, 1:22 pm, Christian wrote:
> XahLeeschrieb:> Of interest:
>
> > ⢠Why Can't You Be Normal?
> > http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
>
> IMHO the point that you never reply to responds is what makes it
> problematic.
> I have seen 10 or more t
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Larry Gates wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:09:52 +, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Well, don't worry - nobody is going to ban you from Usenet (except
possibly the Chinese govt).
OTOH, nobody here much cares.
So, rant on - it's what
Christian wrote:
> Though I think you are misusing the
> Usenet. For what you do you should rather write a weblog so people
> interested in your monologues could follow them in a place where they
> are by definition on topic.
I would agree that is the issue in Xah Lee's case as well. I don't kno
Xah Lee schrieb:
Of interest:
⢠Why Can't You Be Normal?
http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
IMHO the point that you never reply to responds is what makes it
problematic.
I have seen 10 or more threads started by you and in not a single one
of those I have seen an
Larry Gates wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:09:52 +, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Well, don't worry - nobody is going to ban you from Usenet (except
possibly the Chinese govt).
OTOH, nobody here much cares.
So, rant on - it's what Usenet is for. ☄ <--- what is
On 2009-03-09, Kenneth Tilton wrote:
> Buddha taught that the universe is ineluctably a single interconnected
> web of cause and effect, which is my haughty preamble to this
> observation: it depends on the newsgroup.
>
> comp.lang.lisp is cool so here Xah participates as a normal contributor.
A glance at Ban Xah Lee's web page reveals that he is what is called an
autodidact - someone who is self-taught. While this is an admirable
achievement, it carries with it certain dangers.
One is that it gives the illusion that learning is not a social
activity, but an individual one. This is not
Haines Brown wrote:
> If we have studied a field obsessively for some
> years, it is natural that we end in a position where our knowledge will
> generally be superior. But this does not make us superior.
What does make us superior? Are you so dishonest or insane as
to assert that everyone is eq
Roedy Green wrote:
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:52:02 -0800 (PST), Xah Lee
wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
I consider this post relevant because i've been perennially gossiped
about in comp.lang.* groups today and in the past 5 or 10 years, many
of the threads mentioning my name
"Xah Lee" wrote in message
news:a3ee929d-0b9b-4bbf-9cf3-5dcc6ddbc...@d19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
[ SNIP ]
This page is a short collection of online communities that banned me,
in a way that i don't consider just. It illustrates the political
nature among the tech geeking males.
[ SNIP ]
Larry Gates wrote:
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:09:52 +, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Well, don't worry - nobody is going to ban you from Usenet (except
possibly the Chinese govt).
OTOH, nobody here much cares.
So, rant on - it's what Usenet is for. ☄ <--- what i
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Larry Gates wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:09:52 +, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
>
>> Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
>
>>> Well, don't worry - nobody is going to ban you from Usenet (except
>>> possibly the Chinese govt).
>>> OTOH, nobody here much cares.
>>> So,
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:09:52 +, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
> Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
>> Well, don't worry - nobody is going to ban you from Usenet (except
>> possibly the Chinese govt).
>> OTOH, nobody here much cares.
>> So, rant on - it's what Usenet is for. ☄ <--- what is that char
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 03:19:19 + (UTC), Steve Sobol wrote:
> On 2009-03-09, Kenneth Tilton wrote:
>
>> Buddha taught that the universe is ineluctably a single interconnected
>> web of cause and effect, which is my haughty preamble to this
>> observation: it depends on the newsgroup.
>>
>> com
Steve Sobol wrote:
>
> On 2009-03-09, Kenneth Tilton wrote:
>
>> Buddha taught that the universe is ineluctably a single
>> interconnected web of cause and effect, which is my haughty preamble
>> to this observation: it depends on the newsgroup.
>>
>> comp.lang.lisp is cool so here Xah particip
On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:52:02 -0800 (PST), Xah Lee
wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>
>I consider this post relevant because i've been perennially gossiped
>about in comp.lang.* groups today and in the past 5 or 10 years, many
>of the threads mentioning my name are not started
seconded.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mar 8, 1:24Â pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> r wrote:
> > This is to all usenet readers who think they own c.l.py!
>
> [snip abusive, anti-social rant]
>
> Well, after kill-filing this kiddie for a few months, I thought I'd give him
> a chance. By pure luck I chose this post to read.
>
> Good news
r wrote:
> This is to all usenet readers who think they own c.l.py!
[snip abusive, anti-social rant]
Well, after kill-filing this kiddie for a few months, I thought I'd give him
a chance. By pure luck I chose this post to read.
Good news "r", you've earned yourself a permanent kill-filing. I'll
On Mar 7, 5:52Â pm, Xah Lee wrote:
> HARASSMENT BY JOHN BOKMA
>
> I was harassed by a newsgroup poster John Bokma (a regular of
> comp.lang.perl.misc) to have my web hosting service provider kick me
> off. This happened in 2006.
I know the feeling. I have this super geek with nothing but time on
On Mar 8, 7:50Â am, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote:
> So you are going to repeat his postings in their entirety so that those
> that block him will see them anyway, right? Â Wrong. Â We'll just block
> your posts too.
>
> *plonk*
This is to all usenet readers who think they own c.l.py!
On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:38:24 +0900
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> Xah Lee writes:
[snip]
> Don't worry, Xah. At least, my minds is running on your rails. Please do
> not stop. BTW, what do you think about using Gnus instead of G2/1.0?
So you are going to repeat his postings in their entirety so that t
Xah Lee writes:
> Of interest:
>
> ⢠Why Can't You Be Normal?
> http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
>
> ⢠Ban Xah Lee
> http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/ban_Xah_Lee.html
>
> I consider this post relevant because i've been pere
"Grant Edwards" wrote:
>There you go: a 30-second psychological diagnosis by an
>electrical engineer based entirely on Usenet postings. It
>doesn't get much more worthless than that...
Oh it is not entirely worthless - as a working hypothesis,
it seems to cover and explain the observed facts
On 2009-03-08, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Xah Lee wrote:
>>
>>Summary: I was posting relevant but controversial opinions in a rude
>>manner to Âcomp.lang.*Â newsgroups.
>
> And that one (completely accurate) sentence is really the core of virtually
> all of your troubles, isn't it?
>
> Usually, as pe
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
Xah Lee wrote:
Of interest:
• Why Can't You Be Normal?
http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
• Ban Xah Lee
http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/ban_Xah_Lee.html
I consider this post relevant because i've been perennially gossipe
Xah Lee wrote:
>
>Summary: I was posting relevant but controversial opinions in a rude
>manner to Âcomp.lang.*Â newsgroups.
And that one (completely accurate) sentence is really the core of virtually
all of your troubles, isn't it?
Usually, as people mature, they learn by experience that their
Xah Lee wrote:
> Of interest:
Unintesting stuff snipped. Perhaps it's the irrelevant, off topic posts
you continue to make to groups that have nothing to do with your self
gratifying rants? We get it, you think you're smarter than anyone else
and that's the reason for you posting and arguing wi
Xah Lee wrote:
This page is a short collection of online communities that banned me,
in a way that i don't consider just. It illustrates the political
nature among the tech geeking males.
If anybody on this list visits Boston, contact me to claim your free beer.
:)
--
http://mail.python.org/
Xah Lee wrote:
Of interest:
• Why Can't You Be Normal?
http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
• Ban Xah Lee
http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/ban_Xah_Lee.html
I consider this post relevant because i've been perennially gossiped
about in comp.lang.* groups to
Of interest:
• Why Can't You Be Normal?
http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/why_cant_you_be_normal.html
• Ban Xah Lee
http://xahlee.org/Netiquette_dir/ban_Xah_Lee.html
I consider this post relevant because i've been perennially gossiped
about in comp.lang.* groups today and in the pa
59 matches
Mail list logo
