Chris Mellon wrote;
> Now, writing a compiler/interpreter from the ground up is a more
> valuable experience, but does it really matter if the language is the
> same one you wrote the compiler in? It gets harder the more
> complicated the syntax and semantics of the language are, but, say,
> pytho
On 11/23/06, Scott David Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> markscottwright wrote:
> > Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> >> markscottwright wrote:
> >>
> >> > If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
> >>
> >> if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
> >> the
Fredrik Lundh schrieb:
> markscottwright wrote:
>
> > If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
>
> if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
> they'd been done by now.
>
>
The "Python interpreter in Python" part of PyPy _is_ done. Since quite
a wh
markscottwright wrote:
> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>> markscottwright wrote:
>>
>> > If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
>>
>> if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
>> they'd been done by now.
>>
>>
>
> Isn't that the point of PyPy? It's what t
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> markscottwright wrote:
>
> > If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
>
> if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
> they'd been done by now.
>
>
Isn't that the point of PyPy? It's what their mission statement says
(http://c
markscottwright wrote:
> If it were that easy, the PyPy guys would be done by now.
if the PyPy guys had focused on writing a Python interpreter in Python,
they'd been done by now.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Paddy:
> Is the MIT course syndicated to Universities around America or something?
> (Is your name pronounced Beer-owe-file, or Bear-oh-fi-lee,
I don't know.
> I too have heard about the MIT course changing to Python elsewhere and
> wanted to know why it was talked about so much?
I don't know w
Paddy wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
> > completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
> > in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
> > simpler to write (but it's not a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
> completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
> in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
> simpler to write (but it's not a fair comparison because
markscottwright:
> I love Python as much as the next guy, but I
> just don't see how SICP can be done in Python.
The contents of the course are probably different, they work on
robotics...
Bye,
bearophile
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
> completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
> in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
> simpler to write (but it's not a fair comparison because
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Haven't heard of that one, although I've got DrScheme.
Right, sorry, I meant that one :-)
> I find that hierarchy extremely annoying. I don't see the need for it.
> I never use OOP in Python yet there's no need for me to have a
> stripped down version, I just don't use it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > No surprise to anyone who's ever tried to use MIT Scheme.
>
> Be careful, such assertions are often flamebait.
Well, yeah, it's a warning to everyone to not
bother with the MIT implementation of Scheme which
is completely worthless.
>
> I am usin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> No surprise to anyone who's ever tried to use MIT Scheme.
Be careful, such assertions are often flamebait.
I am using DrPython (I think they were using it at MIT too lately), and
it is very very good IDE, it produces executables on the fly, it has a
visual debugger with some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
> completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
> in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
> simpler to write (but it's not a fair comparison because
While studying the SICP video lectures I have to twist my mind some to
completely understand the lessons. I implement the programs shown there
in both Python and Scheme, and I find the Python implementations
simpler to write (but it's not a fair comparison because I know very
little Scheme still).
16 matches
Mail list logo
