"Mark Dickinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
| Excellent!
| It looks to me as though this covers everything. I'm tempted to
| quibble about exact wordings, but probably the most productive thing to
do
| would be just to submit this to bugs.python.org and then let Georg Brandl
| work his
On Apr 7, 4:59 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Mark Dickinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thank you for the corrections. Here is my revised proposal:
>
> int([number | string[, radix])
> ...
Excellent!
It looks to me as though this covers e
Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Mark Dickinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | On Apr 7, 6:43 am, "Colin J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > This is good but the documentation for
> | > 3.0 is missing the syntax documentation
> | > from 2.5
> |
> | Is
> |
> |
>
On Apr 8, 2:15 am, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(snip)
> 2. Replace text with:
> Convert a number or string to an integer. If no arguments are given,
> return 0. If a number is given, return number.__int__(). Conversion of
> floating point numbers to integers truncates towards zero.
"Mark Dickinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for the corrections. Here is my revised proposal:
int([number | string[, radix])
Convert a number or string to an integer. If no arguments are given,
return 0. If a number is given, return number.__int__().
On Apr 7, 3:53 pm, Mark Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only base 0 versus base 10 difference I could find was the
> following:
>
> >>> int('033', 0)
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 0: '033'
> [38720 refs]>
On Apr 7, 3:15 pm, "Terry Reedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My suggestions:
> 1. Change signature to: int([number | string[, radix]).
> This makes it clear that radix can only follow a string without having to
> say so in the text.
>
> 2. Replace text with:
> Convert a number or string to an in
"Mark Dickinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Apr 7, 6:43 am, "Colin J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > This is good but the documentation for
| > 3.0 is missing the syntax documentation
| > from 2.5
|
| Is
|
|
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/reference
On Apr 7, 6:43 am, "Colin J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is good but the documentation for
> 3.0 is missing the syntax documentation
> from 2.5
Is
http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/reference/lexical_analysis.html#integer-literals
the documentation that you're looking for?
But it se
Mark Dickinson wrote:
> On Apr 6, 1:29 pm, Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've noticed some oddly inconsistent behavior with int and float:
>>
>> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Mar 7 2008, 03:39:23)
>> [GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on linux2>>>
>> int('- 345')
On Apr 6, 1:29 pm, Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed some oddly inconsistent behavior with int and float:
>
> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Mar 7 2008, 03:39:23)
> [GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on linux2>>>
> int('- 345')
>
> -345
>
> works, but
>
> >
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2008-04-06, Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've noticed some oddly inconsistent behavior with int and float:
>>
>> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Mar 7 2008, 03:39:23)
>> [GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on linux2
> int('- 345')
>>
On 2008-04-06, Lie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed some oddly inconsistent behavior with int and float:
>
> Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Mar 7 2008, 03:39:23)
> [GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on linux2
int('- 345')
> -345
>
> works,
IMO, it oughtn
I've noticed some oddly inconsistent behavior with int and float:
Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Mar 7 2008, 03:39:23)
[GCC 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)] on linux2
>>> int('- 345')
-345
works, but
>>> float('- 345.083')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
14 matches
Mail list logo
