On Apr 7, 6:43 am, "Colin J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is good but the documentation for > 3.0 is missing the syntax documentation > from 2.5
Is http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/reference/lexical_analysis.html#integer-literals the documentation that you're looking for? But it seems to me that Lie's original point isn't really about integer *literals* anyway---it's about the behaviour of the built-in int() function when applied to a string. So http://docs.python.org/dev/3.0/library/functions.html#int is probably the appropriate place in the documentation. And I agree that it could be made clearer exactly what strings are acceptable here. Mark -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
