On Tuesday 05 March 2013 06:54:14 Mark Lawrence did opine:
> On 05/03/2013 02:54, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> >
> > wrote:
> >> It's easy for him to
> >> deal with it, all he has to do is get a goat to eat the garden waste
> >> I toss over the fenc
On 05/03/2013 02:54, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
It's easy for him to
deal with it, all he has to do is get a goat to eat the garden waste I
toss over the fence, and his problem is solved.
Sounds like someone got Steven's goat.
*dives for cove
[- Tue 5.Mar'13 at 2:42:07 + Steven D'Aprano :-]
> On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:09:10 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
>
> > But here's what I don't understand. Why does somebody who posts as
> > much as Steven (and thanks for that. Getting cussed at occasionally is a
> > cheap pric
On Monday 04 March 2013 23:00:31 Chris Angelico did opine:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>
> wrote:
> > It's easy for him to
> > deal with it, all he has to do is get a goat to eat the garden waste I
> > toss over the fence, and his problem is solved.
>
> Sounds like someone
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> It's easy for him to
> deal with it, all he has to do is get a goat to eat the garden waste I
> toss over the fence, and his problem is solved.
Sounds like someone got Steven's goat.
*dives for cover*
ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mai
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 11:09:10 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
> But here's what I don't understand. Why does somebody who posts as
> much as Steven (and thanks for that. Getting cussed at occasionally is a
> cheap price for all the free advice) not set up a simple mail filter
> which trashes all mail
On 03/04/2013 11:15 AM, David Robinow wrote:
Crap. I just forgot to do what I just said I would do and didn't go
through my "inconvenient" sequence.
Sorry, Steven. It was unintentional.
FWIW, you don't have to bother moving the python-list address to a To:
field. Just remove the personal add
Crap. I just forgot to do what I just said I would do and didn't go
through my "inconvenient" sequence.
Sorry, Steven. It was unintentional.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ignoring my own posting ban, since I've clearly been misunderstood ..
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:11:04 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
>
>> Do you consider it rude that you choose to use a newsreader, thus
>> inconveniencing those of us who use th
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 23:00:13 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> How the flying fuck does my choice of where and how *I* read this forum
>> inconvenience YOU?
>>
>> Talk about an overactive sense of entitlement. The world does not
>> revol
On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 03:21:37 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:11:04 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
>> Do you consider it rude that you choose to use a newsreader, thus
>> inconveniencing those of us who use the mailing list, as God intended.
>
> How the flying fuck does my ch
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> How the flying fuck does my choice of where and how *I* read this forum
> inconvenience YOU?
>
> Talk about an overactive sense of entitlement. The world does not revolve
> around you and I do not arrange my day to suit your preferences.
I
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:18 PM, David Robinow wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> But your mail has only what you receive. You have to hunt down a
>> separate archive of what was posted before you joined the thread.
>> Advantage goes to news, but a slight one, and i
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:01 PM, David Robinow wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
>>> There's a number of advantages to news vs. mail. The biggest is that
>>> news spools generally keep a long history around, so it'
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:11:04 -0500, David Robinow wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>> On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico
>>> wrote:
Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster a
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:42:50 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <513298fa$0$30001$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico
>> > wrote:
>> >> Yes, but
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 2:01 PM, David Robinow wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
>> There's a number of advantages to news vs. mail. The biggest is that
>> news spools generally keep a long history around, so it's easy to go
>> back and review a long thread.
> That can't
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> David Robinow wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> >>> Yes, bu
In article ,
David Robinow wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list. W
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list. What
>>> I want is reply-list, acknowledging the l
In article <513298fa$0$30001$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >> Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list. What
> >> I
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list. What
>> I want is reply-list, acknowledging the list headers... and Gmail
>> simply doesn't have that.
>
> I'v
On 03/02/2013 12:06 AM, James Griffin wrote:
[- Sat 2.Mar'13 at 17:54:57 +1100 Chris Angelico :-]
I also want to be able to change my mind as to whether it's
reply-all/reply-list/reply-sender after typing up a reply. Guess it's
time I grabbed Tbird to find out if it can do that
On 02/03/2013 14:53, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list.
What I want is reply-list, acknowledging the list headers... and Gmail
simply doesn't have that.
I've been replying to the post
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list.
> What I want is reply-list, acknowledging the list headers... and Gmail
> simply doesn't have that.
I've been replying to the poster and the list for ages. Is it bad netique
[- Sat 2.Mar'13 at 17:54:57 +1100 Chris Angelico :-]
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Devin Jeanpierre
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> No offence Chris, but you're the only person I know who *regularly*
> >>> replies to the wrong list
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> No offence Chris, but you're the only person I know who *regularly*
>>> replies to the wrong list. Does your mail client not have a "Reply to
>>> List" command, or "Reply All"? If
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> No offence Chris, but you're the only person I know who *regularly*
>> replies to the wrong list. Does your mail client not have a "Reply to
>> List" command, or "Reply All"? If so, then you should use it rather than
>> manually typing the
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:07:19 +1100, Chris Angelico replied to a thread of
> Python-ideas:
>
>> You're asking for a facility whereby variables magically get pulled from
>> the caller's scope.
>
> As interesting as that is, I think you sent i
On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 04:07:19 +1100, Chris Angelico replied to a thread of
Python-ideas:
> You're asking for a facility whereby variables magically get pulled from
> the caller's scope.
As interesting as that is, I think you sent it to the wrong list :)
Again.
O_o
No offence Chris, but you're
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:55 AM, 김용빈 wrote:
> why we bother with '{variable}'.format(variable=variable) ?
> can we just '{variable}.format()' ?
>
> if variable is exist, then assign it.
> if variable is not exist, then raise error
>
> I am not language expert. so sorry if this is not a good idea, o
31 matches
Mail list logo
