Ville Vainio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Mike" == Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mike> IPython's pysh seems a little clumsy for interactive use, as
> Mike> it requires special characters to distinguish between
> Mike> commands to be passed to the shell and commands
> "Mike" == Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> I've actually done some work on using CORBA as a COM for
Mike> Unix (or, as I think of it, an ARexx for Unix). After being
Mike> exposed to Plan 9, I've decided that's a better
Mike> solution. CORBA has the advantage that
> "Mike" == Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> IPython's pysh seems a little clumsy for interactive use, as
Mike> it requires special characters to distinguish between
Mike> commands to be passed to the shell and commands to be passed
Mike> to the scripting language.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Boddie) writes:
> Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > When the CLR is integrated, it will allow a wide array of problem
>> > solving choices for uuu users.
>>
>> You've missed t
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>> Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>Mike Meyer wrote:
>>>
Whatever the intentions may be, the *act* is one of dictation. Since
the point of the underlying OS is to increase the interconnections
between applic
> "Donn" == Donn Cave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Donn> I don't know what the Windows version is like, but for all
Donn> the UNIX shell's weaknesses, it's very well suited to its
Donn> role. The Plan 9
I don't know about that - I don't see anything in shell that couldn't
be done
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > When the CLR is integrated, it will allow a wide array of problem
> > solving choices for uuu users.
>
> You've missed the point. Allowing a wide array of problem solvin
Quoth Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[... re Python OS interface vs. language-generic model ]
| *Allowing* other languages is one thing, but that shouldn't preclude having a
| 'default' language. On other OS's, the default language is some form of shell
| scripting (i.e. Unix shell scripts, o
Paul Rubin wrote:
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Compare out-of-the-box Python:
a = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
And out-of-the-box Lisp:
(setq a (+ 1 2 3 4))
Which language has the lower barrier for entry? That should be a
fairly important consideration for a language that is going to sit at
the he
Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Compare out-of-the-box Python:
>a = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4
>
> And out-of-the-box Lisp:
>(setq a (+ 1 2 3 4))
>
> Which language has the lower barrier for entry? That should be a
> fairly important consideration for a language that is going to sit at
> th
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Whatever the intentions may be, the *act* is one of dictation. Since
the point of the underlying OS is to increase the interconnections
between applications (assuming I've found the correct web page and
interpreted it
Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>>Whatever the intentions may be, the *act* is one of dictation. Since
>>the point of the underlying OS is to increase the interconnections
>>between applications (assuming I've found the correct web page and
>>interpreted it correctl
> "Arich" == Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arich> From: "Richard Taytor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Arich> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Arich> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 4:28 PM
Arich> Subject: [Uuu-devel] languages
>> First, thank you for Unununium. I first lear
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These last two points kind of diverge from the point, no? What I mean
is that we want to present the argument of why Python is the best
choice as THE built-in
Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>>Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>These last two points kind of diverge from the point, no? What I mean
>>>is that we want to present the argument of why Python is the best
>>>choice as THE built-in programming language
Mike Meyer wrote:
Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These last two points kind of diverge from the point, no? What I mean
is that we want to present the argument of why Python is the best
choice as THE built-in programming language for the revolutionary uuu
operating system.
A ne
Arich Chanachai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> These last two points kind of diverge from the point, no? What I mean
> is that we want to present the argument of why Python is the best
> choice as THE built-in programming language for the revolutionary uuu
> operating system.
A new operating syst
I see your point.
Consider points 2 and 3 a nice side effect.
The language I favor actually ties into the environment I am working
in: Python for rapid prototyping, java for larger projects where the
eclipse IDE comes in very handy.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
pythonUser_07 wrote:
Some quick thoughts.
1- Python is not new relatively speaking.
Quite true, good point.
2)- Python is a natural language for learning basic scripting, but can
carry you through to object oriented program.
3)- Knowing python, instantly gets you access to jython. I've found
jy
Some quick thoughts.
1- Python is not new relatively speaking.
2)- Python is a natural language for learning basic scripting, but can
carry you through to object oriented program.
3)- Knowing python, instantly gets you access to jython. I've found
jython incredibly helpful in learning java. F
I consider this to be a good question. I just started to learn Python
and I like it. I don't know about Lisp however...
The problem, IMHO, in creating a new language is that we are losing code
reusability... we will be able to port python applications very easily...
I don't have a clear idea on
21 matches
Mail list logo
